Revision prosthetic of the knee joint. The influence of a navigation system on the alignment and reconstruction of the joint line;Revisionsendoprothetik des kniegelenks. Einfluss eines navigationssystems auf das alignment und die rekonstruktion der gelenklinie

Orthopade

Volumn 35, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1080-1086

  Perlick, L ^a   Luring C ^a   Tingart, M ^a   Grifka, J ^a   Bathis H ^b  

^a Asklepios Klinikum Bad Abbach   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WITTEN HERDECKE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Alignment; Computer assisted surgery; Joint line; Revision; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WEIGHT BEARING;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; KNEE JOINT; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; REOPERATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33750085573     PISSN: 00854530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00132-006-0997-8     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M et al. (2004) Radiological results of image-based and non-image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 28(2): 87-90
2. Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M et al. (2004) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86: 682-687
3. Bertin KC, Freeman MA, Samuelson KM et al. (1985) Stemmed revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67: 242-248
4. Bourne RB, Crawford HA (1998) Principles of revision total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 29: 331-337
5. Buechel FF, Pappas MJ (1986) The New Jersey Low-Contact-Stress Knee Replacement System: biomechanical rationale and review of the first 123 cemented cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 105: 197-204
6. Cope MR, O'Brien BS, Nanu AM (2002) The influence of the posterior cruciate ligament in the maintenance of joint line in primary total knee arthroplasty: a radiologic study. J Arthroplasty 17: 206-208
7. Dorr LD (2002) Session V: Revision total knee replacement: an overview. Clin Orthop 404: 143-144
8. Dorr LD, Boiardo RA (1986) Technical considerations in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 205: 5-11
9. Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (1999) Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instr Course Lect 48: 167-175
10. Figgie HE III, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG et al. (1986) The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68: 1035-1040
11. Gofton WT, Tsigaras H, Butler RA et al. (2002) Revision total knee arthroplasty: fixation with modular stems. Clin Orthop 404: 158-168
12. Griffin FM, Math K, Scuderi GR et al. (2000) Anatomy of the epicondyles of the distal femur: MRI analysis of normal knees. J Arthroplasty 15: 354-359
13. Hofmann AA, Bachus KN, Wyatt RW (1991) Effect of the tibial cut on subsidence following total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 269: 63-69
14. Insall J, Goldberg V, Salvati E (1972) Recurrent dislocation and the high-riding patella. Clin Orthop 88: 67-69
15. Insall J, Lachiewicz PF, Burstein AH (1982) The posterior stabilized condylar prosthesis: a modification of the total condylar design. Two to four-year clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64: 1317-1323
16. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA (1991) Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73: 709-714
17. Jenny JY, Mielke RK, Kohler S et al. (2003) Total knee prosthesis implantation with a non image based navigation system - a multicentric analysis. Proceedings 70th Annual Meeting AAOS, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons New Orleans, 96. 2003, Ref Type: Conference Proceeding
18. Laskin RS (1976) Modular total knee-replacement arthroplasty. A review of eighty-nine patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58: 766-773
19. Laskin RS (2002) Joint line position restoration during revision total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404: 169-171
20. Lotke PA, Ecker ML (1977) Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59: 77-79
21. Noda T, Yasuda S, Nagano K et al. (2000) Clinicoradiological study of total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy. J Orthop Sci 5: 25-36
22. Partington PF, Sawhney J, Rorabeck CH et al. (1999) Joint line restoration after revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 367: 165-171
23. Rand JA (1998) Modular augments in revision total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 29: 347-353
24. Rand JA, Coventry MB (1988) Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 323: 168-173
25. Riley LH, Hungerford DS (1978) Geometric total knee replacement for treatment of the rheumatoid knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60: 523-527
26. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop 299: 153-156
27. Ritter MA, Montgomery TJ, Zhou H et al. (1999) The clinical significance of proximal tibial resection level in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 345: 174-181
28. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T et al. (2000) Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 71: 262-267
29. Scott WN, Rubinstein M, Scuderi G (1988) Results after knee replacement with a posterior cruciatesubstituting prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70: 1163-1173
30. Scuderi GR, Insall JN (1992) Total knee arthroplasty. Current clinical perspectives. Clin Orthop 276: 26-32
31. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH et al. (2002) Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop 40(4): 7-13
32. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H et al. (2003) Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85: 830-835