Navigated unicompartmental knee replacement

Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 103-107

  Jenny, Jean Yves ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF STRASBOURG   (France)

Author keywords

Knee; Minimal invasive surgery; Navigation system; Unicompartmental prosthesis

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FIXATION DEVICE; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LONG TERM CARE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEDICLE SCREW; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SURGEON; SURGICAL ANATOMY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VALIDATION STUDY; ARTICLE; FEMUR; INSTRUMENTATION; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; METHODOLOGY; TIBIA;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMUR; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIBIA;

EID: 46249097216     PISSN: 10628592     EISSN: 15381951     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/JSA.0b013e318172b598     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Buechel FF. Long-term followup after mobile-bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:40-50.
2. Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, et al. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975-1997: an update with special emphasis on 41,223 knees operated on in 1988-1997. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72:503-513.
3. Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:709-714.
4. Rand JA, Coventry MB. Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;232:168-173.
5. Ryd L, Lindtsrand A, Stentstrom A, et al. Porous coated anatomic tricompartmental tibial components. The relationship between position and micromotion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990; 251:189-197.
6. Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies BL, et al. Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;354:49-56.
7. Chin PL, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, et al. Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:618-626.
8. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, et al. Leg axis after computernavigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:282-288.
9. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Computer-assisted implantation of total knee prostheses: a case-control comparative study with classical instrumentation. Comput Aided Surg. 2001;6:217-220.
10. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C, et al. Mise en place des prothè ses totales du genou assiste' e par ordinateur: comparaison avec la technique conventionnelle. Rev Chir Orthop. 2001;87:18-28.
11. Seon JK, Song EK. Navigation-assisted less invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized prospective trial. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:777-782.
12. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, et al. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:830-835.
13. Stockl B, Nogler M, Rosiek R, et al. Navigation improves accuracy of rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:180-186.
14. Victor J, Hoste D. Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:131-139.
15. Cossey AJ, Spriggins AJ. The use of computer-assisted surgical navigation to prevent malalignment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:29-34.
16. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003;11:40-45.
17. Perlick L, Bathis H, Tingart M, et al. Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement with a nonimage-based navigation system. Int Orthop. 2004;28:193-197.
18. Romanowski MR, Repicci JA. Minimally invasive unicondylar arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up. J Knee Surg. 2002;15:17-22.
19. Tria AJ Jr. Advancements in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2003;26:s859-s863.
20. Scuderi GR, Tenholder M, Capeci C. Surgical approaches in miniincision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 248:61-77.
21. Muller PE, Pellengahr C, Witt M, et al. Influence of minimally invasive surgery on implant positioning and the functional outcome for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:296-301.
22. Price AJ, Webb J, Topf H, et al. Rapid recovery after Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:970-976.
23. Reilly KA, Beard DJ, Barker KL, et al. Efficacy of an accelerated recovery protocol for Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A randomised controlled trial. Knee. 2005;12:351-357.
24. Haas SB, Cook S, Beksac B. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini midvastus approach: a comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:68-73.
25. Laskin RS, Beksac B, Phongkukakorn A, et al. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini-midvastus incision: an outcome study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:774-781.
26. Dalury DF, Dennis DA. Mini-incision total knee arthroplasty can increase risk of component malalignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:77-81.
27. Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH, et al. Early failure of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with obesity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440: 60-66.
28. Hamilton WG, Collier MB, Tarabee E, et al. Incidence and reasons for reoperation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(suppl 2):98-107.
29. Jenny JY, Ciobanu E, Boeri C. The rationale for navigated minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;463:58-62.