Peer assessment accounting for student agreement

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 301-314

  Neus, Jordan L ^a  

^a SUFFOLK COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Agreement; Individual grade; Individual weighting factor; Peer assessment; Reliability

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953153363     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930903342315     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Cheng, W., and M. Warren. 2000. Making a difference: Using peers to assess individual students' contributions to a group project. Teaching in Higher Education 5, no. 2: 243-255.
2. Conway, R., D. Kember, A. Sivan, and M. Wu. 1993. Peer assessment of an individual's contribution to a group project. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 18, no. 1: 45-56.
3. Fuchs, L., D. Fuchs, K. Karns, C. Hamlett, C. Katzaroff, and S. Dutka. 1998. Comparisons among individual and cooperative performance assessments and other measures of mathematical competence. Elementary School Journal 99: 23-52.
4. Gamson, Z. 1994. Cooperative learning comes of age. Change 26: 44-50.
5. Gatfield, T. 1999. Examining student satisfaction with group projects and peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 24, no. 4: 365-377.
6. Ghinis, D., Th. Chadjipantelis, and S. Bersimis. 2005. Experiences from teaching statistics using directed projects in a Greek elementary school. Teaching Statistics 27, no. 1: 2-7.
7. Giraud, G., and C. Enders. 2000. The effects of repeated cooperative testing in an introductory statistics course. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April in San Diego, CA.
8. Goldfinch, J. 1994. Further developments in peer assessment of group projects. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 19, no. 1: 29-35.
9. Gupta, M.L. 2004. Enhancing student performance through cooperative learning in physical sciences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29, no. 1: 639-654.
10. Kilic, G., and M. Cakan. 2006. The analysis of the impact of individual weighting factor on individual scores. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31, no. 6: 639-654.
11. Langendyk, V. 2006. Not knowing that they do not know: Self-assessment accuracy of thirdyear medical students. Medical Education 40: 173-179.
12. Lejk, M., and M. Wyvill. 2001a. Peer assessment of contributions to a group project: A comparison of holistic and category-based approaches. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 26, no. 1: 61-72.
13. Lejk, M., and M. Wyvill. 2001b. The effect of the inclusion of self-assessment with peer assessment of contributions to a group project: A quantitative study of secret and agreed assessments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 26, no. 6: 551-561.
14. Lejk, M., and M. Wyvill. 2002. Peer assessment of contributions to a group project: Student attitudes to holistic and category-based approaches. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27: 569-577.
15. Lurie, S., D. Lambert, A. Nofziger, R. Epstein, and T. Grady-Weliky. 2007. Relationship between peer assessment during medical school dean's letter rankings, and ratings by internship directors. Journal of General Internal Medicine 22: 13-16.
16. Nowak, L., S. Miller, and J. Washburn. 1996. Team testing increases performance. Journal of Education for Business 71: 253-256.
17. Russo, A., and S. Warren. 1999. Cooperative test taking. College Teaching 47: 18-20.
18. Sernau, S. 1995. Using a cooperative problem-solving approach in teaching social stratification. Teaching Sociology 23: 364-373.
19. Sharp, S. 2006. Deriving individual student marks from a tutor's assessment of group work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31, no. 3: 329-343.
20. Slavin, R. 1980. Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research 50: 315-342.
21. Sobral, D.T. 1997. Improving learning skills: A self-help approach. Higher Education 33: 39-50.
22. Webster, S.K. 2001. Teaching psychometrics in South Korea through a reunification attitude scale class project. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, August 24-28, in San Francisco, CA.