Comparisons among individual and cooperative performance assessments and other measures of mathematics competence

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 99, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 23-51

  Fuchs, Lynn S ^a   Fuchs, Douglas ^a   Karns, Kathy ^a   Hamlett, Carol ^a   Katzaroff, Michelle ^a   Dutka, Suzanne ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039527102     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/461915     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Archbald, D. A., & Newmann, F. M. (1988). Beyond standardized testing: Assessing academic achievement in the secondary school. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
2. Baron, J. B. (1994, April). Using multi-dimensionality to compare verisimilitude: Criterion-referenced performance-based assessments and the ooze factor. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
3. Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1989). Guided cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 393-451). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Burton, G. M., Kaplan, J. D., Hopkins, M. H., Johnson, H. C., Kennedy, L. M., & Schultz, K. A. (1992). Mathematics plus. Orlando: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
5. Damon, W., & Phelps, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three methods of peer education. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 9-19.
6. Darling-Hammond, L. (1992, April). Reframing the school reform agenda: Developing capacity for school transformation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
7. Farivar, S., & Webb, N. M. (1991). Helping behavior activities handbook. Los Angeles: University of California, Graduate School of Education.
8. Fuchs, L. S. (1994). Connecting performance assessment to instruction. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
9. Fuchs, L. S. (1995, May). Curriculum-based measurement and eligibility decision making: An emphasis on treatment validity and growth. Paper presented at the Workshop on IQ Testing and Educational Decision Making, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences.
10. Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1991). Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children, 57, 488-501.
11. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Bentz, J., Phillips, N., & Hamlett, C. L. (1994). The nature of student interactions during peer tutoring with and without prior training and experience. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 75-103.
12. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Phillips, N., Karns, K., & Dutka, S. (1997). Enhancing students' helping behavior during peer-mediated instruction with conceptual mathematical explanations. Elementary School Journal, 97, 223-250.
13. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Stecker, P. M. (1991). Effects of curriculum-based measurement and consultation on teacher planning and student achievement in mathematics operations. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 617-641.
14. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Thompson, A., Roberts, P. H., Kubek, P., & Stecker, P. (1994). Technical features of a mathematics concepts and applications curriculum-based measurement system. Diagnostique, 19(4), 23-49.
15. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Karns, K., Hamlett, C. L., & Katzaroff, M. (1998). Effects of increasing student familiarity with test structure on performance assessment scores. Manuscript submitted for publication.
16. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Karns, K., Katzaroff, M., & Hamlett, C. L. (1998). Mathematics performance assessments in the classroom: Effects on teacher planning and student learning. Manuscript submitted for publication.
17. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Karns, K., & Phillips, N. (1995). Peer-mediated learning strategies: A manual (Available from Box 328 Peabody, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203).
18. Fuchs, L. S., Hamlett, C. L., & Fuchs, D. (1990). Monitoring basic skills progress: Basic math [computer software]. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
19. Goodman, J. (1995). Change without difference: School restructuring in historical perspective. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 1-28.
20. Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1989). Components analysis of cognitive strategy instruction: Effects on learning disabled students' compositions and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 353-361.
21. Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J. C., & Hall, R. V. (1989). Longitudinal effects of classwide peer tutoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 371-383.
22. Hambleton, R. K., Jaeger, R. M., Koretz, D., Linn, R. L., Millman, J., & Phillips, S. E. (1995) Review of the measurement quality of the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System (Final Report). Prepared for the Office of Educational Accountability, Kentucky General Assembly, Lexington, KY.
23. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1995). Constructivism: Principles, paradigms, and integration. Journal of Special Education, 28, 233-247.
24. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
25. Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65-97). New York: Macmillan.
26. Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1993). Instructional tasks, classroom discourse, and students' learning in second-grade arithmetic. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 393-425.
27. Kansas State Board of Education. (1991). Kansas Quality Performance Accreditation. Topeka: Author.
28. King, A. (1992). Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning. Educational Psychologist, 27, 111-126.
29. Koretz, D., Barron, S., Mitchell, K., & Stecker, B. (1996). Perceived effects of the Kentucky Instructional Results Information System. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
30. Koretz, D., Mitchell, K., Barron, S., & Keith, S. (1996). Final report: Perceived effects of the Maryland School Performance Assessment Program. Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
31. Linn, R. L. (1991). Dimensions of thinking: Implications for testing. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform (pp. 179-208). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. MacMillan/McGraw-Hill. (1989). Comprehensive Test of Basic Skills (4th ed.). Monterey, CA: Macmillan/McGraw-Hill.
33. Michaels, S., & Bruce, C. (1991). Discourses on the seasons (Technical Report). Champaign: University of Illinois, Reading Research and Education Center.
34. Mory, E., & Salisbury, D. (1992, April). School restructuring: The critical element of total system design. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
35. Neuberger, W. (1993, September). Making group assessments fair measures of students' abilities. Paper presented at the National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Tests' Conference on "Assessment Questions: Equity Answers," University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
36. O'Connor, R., & Jenkins, J. R. (1996). Cooperative learning as an inclusion strategy: The experience of special education students. Exceptionality, 6, 29-52.
37. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1989). Classroom dialogues to promote self-regulated comprehension. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 1, pp. 35-71). New York: JAI Press.
38. Peterson, P. L., Wilkinson, L. C., Spinelli, F., & Swing, S. (1984). Merging the process-product and sociolinguistic paradigms: Research on small-group processes. In P. L. Peterson, L. C. Wilkinson, & M. Hallinan (Eds.), The social context of instruction: Group organization and group processes (pp. 126-152). New York: Academic Press.
39. Poplum, M. (1996). Cooperative groups: Alternative assessment for students with disabilities? Journal of Special Education, 30, 1-17.
40. Sammons, K. B., Kobett, B., Heiss, J., & Fennell, F. S. (1992). Linking instruction and assessment in the mathematics classroom. Arithmetic Teacher, 11-15.
41. Saner, H., McCaffrey, D., Stecher, B., Klein, S., & Bell, R. (1994). The effects of working in pairs on science performance assessments. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
42. Seaman, M. A., Levin, J. R., & Serlin, R. C. (1991). New developments in pairwise multiple comparisons: Some powerful and practical problems. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 577-586.
43. Shepard, L. A. (1989). Why we need better assessments. Educational Leadership, 46, 23-27.
44. Shinn, M. R., Ysseldyke, J. E., Deno, S. L., & Tindal, G. A. (1986). A comparison of differences between students labeled learning disabled and low achieving on measures of classroom performance. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 545-552.
45. Thompson, B. (1996). AERA editorial policies regarding statistical significance testing: Three suggested reforms. Educational Researcher, 25(2), 26-30.
46. Top, B. L., & Osguthorpe, R. T. (1987). Reverse role tutoring: The effects of handicapped students tutoring regular class students. Elementary School Journal, 87, 413-423.
47. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1992, February). Testing in American schools. Asking the right questions (OTA-SET-519). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
48. Walberg, H. J. (1984). Improving the productivity of America's schools. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 19-27.
49. Webb, N.M. (1991). Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 366-389.
50. Webb, N. M. (1995). Group collaboration in assessment: Multiple objectives, processes, and outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17, 239-261.
51. Webb, N. M., Troper, J., & Fall, J. R. (1995). Constructive activity and learning in collaborative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 406-423.
52. Wiegmann, D. A., Dansereau, D. F., & Patterson, M. E. (1992). Cooperative learning: Effects of role-playing and ability on performance. Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 109-116.
53. Wiggins, G. (1989). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 703-713.
54. Zook, K. B., & DiVesta, F. J. (1989). Effects of overt controlled verbalizations and goal specific search on acquisition of procedural knowledge in problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 220-225.