Visual crowding: A fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 160-168

  Whitney, David ^a   Levi, Dennis M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COUNTS-AS; FUNDAMENTAL LIMITS; LOW-LEVEL VISION; OPERATIONAL DEFINITION; VISUAL CROWDING; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

VISION;

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

ANISOTROPY; ATTENTION; CONSCIOUSNESS; DISTRACTIBILITY; FACIAL EXPRESSION; HUMAN; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTION; RECOGNITION; REVIEW; VISION; VISUAL CROWDING;

ATTENTION; CONSCIOUSNESS; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 79953122831     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.02.005     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. Levi D.M. Crowding - an essential bottleneck for object recognition: a mini-review. Vision Res. 2008, 48:635-654.
2. Pelli D.G., Tillman K.A. The uncrowded window of object recognition. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11:1129-1135.
3. Levi D.M., et al. Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in peripheral vision: peripheral crowding is neither size invariant nor simple contrast masking. J. Vis. 2002, 2:167-177.
4. Levi D.M., et al. Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in amblyopic vision. Vision Res. 2002, 42:1379-1394.
5. Pelli D.G., et al. Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection. J. Vis. 2004, 4:1136-1169.
6. Bouma H. Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature 1970, 226:177-178.
7. Toet A., Levi D.M. The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea. Vision Res. 1992, 32:1349-1357.
8. Feng C., et al. Horizontal and vertical asymmetry in visual spatial crowding effects. J. Vis. 2007, 7:13. 1-10.
9. He S., et al. Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness. Nature 1996, 383:334-337.
10. Liu T., et al. Reduction of the crowding effect in spatially adjacent but cortically remote visual stimuli. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:127-132.
11. Banks W.P., et al. Asymmetry of lateral interference in visual letter identification. Percept. Psychophys. 1977, 22:232-240.
12. Petrov Y., et al. Crowding and surround suppression: not to be confused. J. Vis. 2007, 7:12. 1-9.
13. Farzin F., et al. Holistic crowding of Mooney faces. J. Vis. 2009, 9(6):18. 11-15.
14. Motter B.C., Simoni D.A. The roles of cortical image separation and size in active visual search performance. J. Vis. 2007, 7:1-15.
15. Bex P.J., et al. The shape and size of crowding for moving targets. Vision Res. 2003, 43:2895-2904.
16. Chakravarthi R., Cavanagh P. Temporal properties of the polarity advantage effect in crowding. J. Vis. 2007, 7(2):11. 1-13.
17. Huckauf A., Heller D. On the relations between crowding and visual masking. Percept. Psychophys. 2004, 66:584-595.
18. Ng J., Westheimer G. Time course of masking in spatial resolution tasks. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2002, 79:98-102.
19. Enns J.T. Object substitution and its relation to other forms of visual masking. Vision Res. 2004, 44:1321-1331.
20. Bonneh Y.S., et al. Spatial and temporal crowding in amblyopia. Vision Res. 2007, 47:1950-1962.
21. Yeshurun Y., Rashal E. Precueing attention to the target location diminishes crowding and reduces the critical distance. J. Vis. 2010, 10:1-12.
22. Tyler C.W., Likova L.T. Crowding: a neuroanalytic approach. J. Vis. 2007, 7(2):16. 1-9.
23. Greenwood J.A., et al. Crowding changes appearance. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:496-501.
24. Levi D.M., Carney T. Crowding in peripheral vision: why bigger is better. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:1988-1993.
25. Parkes L., et al. Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4:739-744.
26. Baldassi S., et al. Visual clutter causes high-magnitude errors. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:e56.
27. Bulakowski P.F., et al. Reexamining the possible benefits of visual crowding: dissociating crowding from ensemble percepts. Atten. Percept Psychophys 2011, 10.3758/s13414-010-0086-2.
28. Livne T., Sagi D. Configuration influence on crowding. J. Vis. 2007, 7(2):4. 1-12.
29. Felisbert F.M., et al. The role of target salience in crowding. Perception 2005, 34:823-833.
30. Mareschal I., et al. Cortical distance determines whether flankers cause crowding or the tilt illusion. J Vis 2010, 10:13.
31. Song S., Levi D.M. Spatiotemporal mechanisms for simple image feature perception in normal and amblyopic vision. J Vis 2010, 10(13):21. 1-22.
32. Aghdaee S.M. Adaptation to spiral motion in crowding condition. Perception 2005, 34:155-162.
33. Whitney D. Motion distorts perceived position without awareness of motion. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15:R324-326.
34. Blake R., et al. Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:4783-4788.
35. Dakin S.C., et al. Probabilistic, positional averaging predicts object-level crowding effects with letter-like stimuli. J. Vis. 2010, 10:1-16.
36. Greenwood J.A., et al. Positional averaging explains crowding with letter-like stimuli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:13130-13135.
37. Haberman J., Whitney D. Rapid extraction of mean emotion and gender from sets of faces. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:R751-753.
38. Popple A.V., Levi D.M. The perception of spatial order at a glance. Vision Res. 2005, 45:1085-1090.
39. Strasburger H. Unfocused spatial attention underlies the crowding effect in indirect form vision. J. Vis. 2005, 5:1024-1037.
40. Huckauf A., et al. Semantic processing of crowded stimuli?. Psychol. Res. 2008, 72:648-656.
41. Kooi F.L., et al. The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. Spat. Vis. 1994, 8:255-279.
42. Nazir T.A. Effects of lateral masking and spatial precueing on gap-resolution in central and peripheral vision. Vision Res. 1992, 32:771-777.
43. Andriessen J.J., Bouma H. Eccentric vision - adverse interactions between line segments. Vision Res. 1976, 16:71-78.
44. Hariharan S., et al. 'Crowding' in normal and amblyopic vision assessed with Gaussian and Gabor C's. Vision Res. 2005, 45:617-633.
45. Chung S.T., et al. Spatial-frequency and contrast properties of crowding. Vision Res. 2001, 41:1833-1850.
46. Gheri C., et al. The relationship between search efficiency and crowding. Perception 2007, 36:1779-1787.
47. Kennedy G.J., Whitaker D. The chromatic selectivity of visual crowding. J. Vis. 2010, 10:15.
48. Pöder E., Wagemans J. Crowding with conjunctions of simple features. J. Vis. 2007, 7(2):23. 1-12.
49. Hubbard E.M., et al. Individual differences among grapheme-color synesthetes: brain-behavior correlations. Neuron 2005, 45:975-985.
50. Banton T., Levi D.M. Spatial localization of motion-defined and luminance-defined contours. Vision Res. 1993, 33:2225-2237.
51. Chung S.T., et al. Crowding between first- and second-order letter stimuli in normal foveal and peripheral vision. J Vis 2007, 7(2):10. 1-13.
52. Livne T., Sagi D. How do flankers' relations affect crowding?. J. Vis. 2010, 10(3):1. 1-14.
53. Malania M., et al. Grouping of contextual elements that affect Vernier thresholds. J. Vis. 2007, 7(2):1. 1-7.
54. Pöder E. Crowding, feature integration, and two kinds of 'attention'. J. Vis. 2006, 6:163-169.
55. Saarela T.P., et al. Global stimulus configuration modulates crowding. J. Vis. 2009, 9(2):5. 1-11.
56. Saarela T.P., et al. The effect of spacing regularity on visual crowding. J. Vis. 2010, 10:1-7.
57. Louie E.G., et al. Holistic crowding: selective interference between configural representations of faces in crowded scenes. J. Vis. 2007, 7(2):24. 1-11.
58. Cavanagh P. What's up in top-down processing?. Representation of Vision: Trends and Tacit Assumptions in Vision Research 1991, 295-304. Cambridge Press. A. Gorea (Ed.).
59. Martelli M., et al. Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts. J. Vis. 2005, 5:58-70.
60. Chakravarthi R., Cavanagh P. Bilateral field advantage in visual crowding. Vision Res. 2009, 49:1638-1646.
61. Freeman J., Pelli D.G. An escape from crowding. J. Vis. 2007, 7(2):22. 1-14.
62. Dakin S.C., et al. Dissociable effects of attention and crowding on orientation averaging. J. Vis. 2009, 9(11):28. 1-16.
63. Chakravarthi R., Cavanagh P. Recovery of a crowded object by masking the flankers: determining the locus of feature integration. J. Vis. 2009, 9:1-9.
64. Wallis T.S., Bex P.J. Visual crowding is correlated with awareness. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:254-258.
65. Flom M.C., et al. Contour interaction and visual resolution: contralateral effects. Science 1963, 142:979-980.
66. Tripathy S.P., Levi D.M. Long-range dichoptic interactions in the human visual cortex in the region corresponding to the blind spot. Vision Res. 1994, 34:1127-1138.
67. Pelli D.G. Crowding: a cortical constraint on object recognition. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2008, 18:445-451.
68. Bi T., et al. The effect of crowding on orientation-selective adaptation in human early visual cortex. J Vis 2009, 9(11):13. 1-10.
69. Motter B.C. Modulation of transient and sustained response components of V4 neurons by temporal crowding in flashed stimulus sequences. J. Neurosci. 2006, 26:9683-9694.
70. Merigan W.H. Cortical area V4 is critical for certain texture discriminations, but this effect is not dependent on attention. Vis. Neurosci. 2000, 17:949-958.
71. Wilkinson F., et al. Lateral interactions in peripherally viewed texture arrays. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 1997, 14:2057-2068.
72. van den Berg R., et al. A neurophysiologically plausible population code model for feature integration explains visual crowding. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2010, 6:e1000646.
73. Dayan P., Solomon J.A. Selective Bayes: attentional load and crowding. Vision Res. 2010, 50:2248-2260.
74. Neri P., Levi D.M. Spatial resolution for feature binding is impaired in peripheral and amblyopic vision. J. Neurophysiol. 2006, 96:142-153.
75. Balas B., et al. A summary-statistic representation in peripheral vision explains visual crowding. J. Vis. 2009, 9(12):13. 1-18.
76. Bulakowski P.F., et al. Visuomotor crowding: the resolution of grasping in cluttered scenes. Front Behav. Neurosci. 2009, 3:49.
77. Vlaskamp B.N., Hooge I.T. Crowding degrades saccadic search performance. Vision Res. 2006, 46:417-425.
78. Cohen E.H., et al. The relationship between spatial pooling and attention in saccadic and perceptual tasks. Vision Res. 2007, 47:1907-1923.
79. Meegan D.V., Tipper S.P. Reaching into cluttered visual environments: spatial and temporal influences of distracting objects. Q.J. Exp. Psychol. A 1998, 51:225-249.
80. Habak C., et al. Preservation of shape discrimination in aging. J. Vis. 2009, 9(12):1-18.
81. Farzin F., et al. Spatial resolution of conscious visual perception in infants. Psychol. Sci. 2010, 21:1502-1509.
82. Atkinson J., et al. Visual acuity testing of young children with the Cambridge Crowding Cards at 3 and 6 m. Acta Ophthalmol. (Copenh.) 1988, 66:505-508.
83. Jeon S.T., et al. Developmental changes during childhood in single-letter acuity and its crowding by surrounding contours. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 2010, 107:423-437.
84. Keita L., et al. Far visual acuity is unremarkable in autism: do we need to focus on crowding?. Autism. Res. 2010, 333-341.
85. Martelli M., et al. Crowding, reading, and developmental dyslexia. J. Vis. 2009, 9(4):14. 1-18.
86. Levi D.M., Klein S.A. Vernier acuity, crowding and amblyopia. Vision Res. 1985, 25:979-991.
87. Tripathy S.P., Cavanagh P. The extent of crowding in peripheral vision does not scale with target size. Vision Res. 2002, 42:2357-2369.
88. Schwartz E.L. Computational anatomy and functional architecture of striate cortex: a spatial mapping approach to perceptual coding. Vision Res. 1980, 20:645-669.
89. Levi D.M., et al. Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification. Vision Res. 1985, 25:963-977.
90. Zhang J.Y., et al. Legibility of Chinese characters in peripheral vision and the top-down influences on crowding. Vision Res. 2009, 49:44-53.
91. Grainger J., et al. Crowding affects letters and symbols differently. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2010, 36:673-688.
92. Scolari M., et al. Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays?. J. Vis. 2007, 7(2):7. 1-23.
93. Vickery T.J., et al. Supercrowding: weakly masking a target expands the range of crowding. J. Vis. 2009, 9(2):12. 1-15.
94. Chung S.T. Learning to identify crowded letters: does it improve reading speed?. Vision Res. 2007, 47:3150-3159.
95. Sun G.J., et al. Ideal observer analysis of crowding and the reduction of crowding through learning. J. Vis. 2010, 10:1-14.
96. Latham K., Whitaker D. Relative roles of resolution and spatial interference in foveal and peripheral vision. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 1996, 16:49-57.
97. Huckauf A. Task set determines the amount of crowding. Psychol. Res. 2007, 71:646-652.
98. Bichot N.P., Desimone R. Finding a face in the crowd: parallel and serial neural mechanisms of visual selection. Prog. Brain Res. 2006, 155:147-156.
99. Gallant, J. (2003) Neural mechanisms of natural scene perception. In The Visual Neurosciences (LM, C. and JS, W., eds), pp. 1590-1602, MIT Press.
100. Chelazzi L. Serial attention mechanisms in visual search: a critical look at the evidence. Psychol. Res. 1999, 62:195-219.