Crowding with conjunctions of simple features

Journal of Vision

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2007, Pages

  Põder, Endel ^a,b   Wagemans, Johan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Conjunctions; Crowding; Feature integration; Features; Localization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COLOR; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; VISION; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; COLOR; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 36248975573     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/7.2.23     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Andriessen, J. J., & Bouma, H. (1976). Eccentric vision: Adverse interactions between line segments. Vision Research, 16, 71-78.
2. Ashby, F. G., Prinzmetal, W., Ivry, R., & Maddox, W. T. (1996). A formal theory of feature binding in object perception. Psychological Review, 103, 165-192.
3. Baldassi, S., Megna, N., & Burr, D. C. (2006). Visual clutter causes high magnitude errors. PLoS Biology, 4, 387-394.
4. Bjork, E. L., & Murray, J. T. (1977). On the nature of input channels in visual processing. Psychological Review, 84, 472-484.
5. Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226, 177-178.
6. Butler, B. E., & Currie, A. (1986). On the nature of perceptual limits in vision: A new look at lateral masking. Psychological Research, 48, 201-209.
7. Donk, M. (1999). Illusory conjunctions are an illusion: The effect of target-nontarget similarity on conjunction and feature errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1207-1233.
8. Eriksen, C. W., & Rohrbaugh, J. W. (1970). Some factors determining efficiency of selective attention. American Journal of Psychology, 83, 330-342.
9. Estes, W. K. (1982). Similarity-related channel interactions in visual processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 353-382.
10. Felisberti, F. M., Solomon, J. A., & Morgan, M. J. (2005). The role of target salience in crowding. Perception, 34, 823-833.
11. Gattass, R., Gross, C. G., & Sandell, J. H. (1981). Visual topography of V2 in the macaque. Journal of Comparative Neutology, 201, 519-539.
12. Gattass, R., Sousa, A. P., & Gross, C. G. (1988). Visuotopic organization and extent of V3 and V4 of the macaque. Journal of Neuroscience, 8, 1831-1845.
13. Huckauf, A., & Heller, D. (2002). What various kinds of errors tell us about lateral maskin effects. Visual Cognition, 9, 889-910.
14. Intriligator, J., & Cavanagh, P. (2001). The spatial resolution of visual attention. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 171-216.
15. Ivry, R. B., & Prinzmetal, W. (1991). Effect of feature similarity on illusory conjunctions. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 105-116.
16. Kooi, F. L., Toet, A., Tripathy, S. P., & Levi, D. M. (1994). The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. Spatial Vision, 8, 255-279.
17. Levi, D. M., Hariharan, S., & Klein, S. A. (2002). Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in peripheral vision: Peripheral crowding is neither size invariant nor simple contrast masking. Journal of Vision, 2(2):3, 167-177, http://journalofvision.org/2/ 2/3/, doi:10.1167/2.2.3.
18. Livne, T., & Sagi, D. (2007). Configuration influence on crowding. Journal of Vision, 7(2):4, 1-12, http://journalofvision.org (7/2/4/, doi:10.1167/7.2.4.
19. Nandy, A. S., & Tjan, B. S. (2007). The nature of letter crowding as revealed by first- and second-order classification images. Journal of Vision, 7(2):5, 1-26, http://journalofvision.org/7/2/5/, doi:10.1167/ 7.2.5.
20. Neri, P., & Levi, D. M. (2006). Spatial resolution for feature binding is impaired in peripheral and amblyopic vision. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96, 142-153.
21. Parkes, L., Lund, J., Angelucci, A., Solomon, J. A., & Morgan, M. (2001). Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 739-744.
22. Pelli, D. G., Palomares, M., & Majaj, N. J. (2004). Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: Distinguishing feature integration from detection. Journal of Vision, 4(12):12, 1136-1169, http://journalofvision.org/4/12/12/, doi:10.1167/4.12.12.
23. Põder, E. (2006). Crowding, feature integration, and two kinds of "attention." Journal of Vision, 6(2):7, 163-169, http://journalofvision.org/6/2/7/, doi:10.1167/6.2.7.
24. Popple, A. V., & Levi, D. M. (2005). The perception of spatial order at a glance. Vision Research, 45, 1085-1090.
25. Prinzmetal, W., Ivry, R. B., Beck, D., & Shimizu, N. (2002). A measuretneht theory of illusory conjunctions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 251-269.
26. Smith, A. T., Singh, K. D., Williams, A. L., & Greenlee, M. W. (2001). Estimating receptive field size from fWRI data in human striate and extrastriate visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 1182-1190.
27. Strasburger, H. (2005). Unfocussed spatial attention underlies the crowding effect in indirect form vision. Journal of Vision, 5(11):8, 1024-1037, http://journalofvision.org/5/11/8/, doi:10.1167/ 5.11.8.
28. Strasburger, H., Harvey, L. O., Jr., & Rentschler, I. (1991). Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 495-508.
29. Styles, E. A., & Allport, D. A. (1986). Perceptual integration of identity, location and colour. Psychological Research, 48, 189-200.
30. Toet, A., & Levi, D. M. (1992). The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafoyea. Vision Research, 32, 1349-1357.
31. Treisman, A., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107-141.
32. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
33. Van Essen, D. C., Newsome, W. T., & Maunsell, J. H. (1984). The visual field representation in striate cortex of the macaque monkey: Asymmetries, anisotropies, and individual variability. Vision Research, 24, 429-448.
34. Wolford, G. (1975). Perturbation model for letter identification. Psychological Review, 82, 184-199.
35. Wolford, G., & Chambers, L. (1984). Contour interaction as a function of retinal eccentricity. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 457-460.
36. Wolford, G., & Shum, K. H. (1980). Evidence for feature perturbations. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 409-420.