An escape from crowding

Journal of Vision

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2007, Pages

  Freeman, Jeremy ^a   Pelli, Denis G ^b,c  

^a SWARTHMORE COLLEGE   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Attention; Change blindness; Change detection; Crowding; Feature integration; Object recognition; Partial report; Segmentation; Visual memory

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MALE; MEMORY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MEMORY; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 35548991485     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/7.2.22     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Banks, W. P., Larson, D. W., & Prinzmetal, W. (1979). Asymmetry of visual interference. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 447-456.
2. Becker, M. W., Pashler, H., & Anstis, S. M. (2000). The role of iconic memory in change-detection tasks. Perception, 29, 273-286.
3. Blaser, E., Papathomas, T., & Vidnyánszky, Z. (2005). Binding of motion and colour is early and automatic. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 2040-2044.
4. Block, N. (2001). Paradox and cross purposes in recent work on consciousness. Cognition, 79, 197-219.
5. Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226, 177-178.
6. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
7. Cavanagh, P. (2004). Attention routines and the architecture of selection. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of attention (pp. 13-28). New York: Guilford Press.
8. Cavanagh, P., & Holcombe, A. O. (2007). Non-retinotopic crowding [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 7(9):338, 338a, http://journalofvision.org/7/9/338/, doi:10.1167/7.9.338.
9. Driver, J., Davis, G., Russell, C., Turatto, M., & Freeman, E. (2001). Segmentation, attention and phenomenal visual objects. Cognition, 80, 61-95.
10. Farell, B., & Pelli, D. G. (1993). Can we attend to large and small at the same time? Vision Research, 33, 2757-2772.
11. He, S., Cavanagh, P., & Intriligator, J. (1996). Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness. Nature, 383, 334-337.
12. Holcombe, A. O., & Cavanagh, P. (2001). Early binding of feature pairs for visual perception. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 127-128.
13. Huckauf, A., & Heller, D. (2002). Spatial selection in peripheral letter recognition: In search of boundary conditions. Acta Psychologica, 111, 101-123.
14. Intriligator, J., & Cavanagh, P. (2001). The spatial resolution of visual attention. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 171-216.
15. Jackson, M. C., & Raymond, J. E. (2006). The role of attention and familiarity in face identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 543-557.
16. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology: Part 1 (p. 402). New York: Dover Publications.
17. Lamme, V. A. (2004). Separate neural definitions of visual consciousness and visual attention; a case for phenomenal awareness. Neural Networks, 17, 861-872.
18. Landman, R., Spekreijse, H., & Lamme, V. A. (2003). Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness. Vision Research, 43, 149-164.
19. Landolt, E. (1891). Nouvelles recherches sur la physiologie des mouvements des yeux. Achives d'ophthalmologie, 11, 385-395.
20. Levi, D. M., Klein, S. A., & Yap, Y. L. (1987). Positional uncertainty in peripheral and amblyopic vision. Vision Research, 27, 581-597.
21. Levi, D. M., Song, S., & Pelli, D. G. (2007). Amblyopic reading is crowded. Journal of Vision, 7(2):21, http://journalofvision.org/7/ 2/21/, doi:10.1167/7.2.21.
22. Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279-281.
23. Martelli, M., Majaj, N. J., & Pelli, D. G. (2005) Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts. Journal of Vision, 5(1):6, 58-70, http://journalofvision.org/5/1/6/, doi:10.1167/5.1.6.
24. Morgan, M. J., Ward, R. M., & Castet, E. (1998). Visual search for a tilted target: Tests of spatial uncertainty models. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 51, 347-370.
25. Nazir, T. A. (1992). Effects of lateral masking and spatial precueing on gap-resolution in central and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 32, 771-777.
26. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
27. Noe, A., Pessoa, L., & Thompson, E. (2000). Beyond the grand illusion: What change blindness really teaches us about vision. Visual Cognition, 7, 93-106.
28. Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 369-378.
29. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
30. Pelli, D. G., Burns, C. W., Farell, B., & Moore-Page, D. C. (2006). Feature detection and letter identification. Vision Research, 46, 4646-4674.
31. Pelli, D. G., Palomares, M., & Majaj, N. J. (2004). Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: Distinguishing feature integration from detection. Journal of Vision, 4(12):12, 1136-1169, http://journalofvision.org/4/12/12/, doi:10.1167/4.12.12.
32. Pelli, D. G., & Tillman, K. A. (2007). Parts, wholes, and context in reading: A triple dissociation. PLoS One, 2, e680.
33. Pelli, D. G., Tillman, K. A., Freeman, J., Su, M., Berger, T., & Majaj, N. J. (2007). Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. Journal of Vision, 7(2):20, http://journalofvision.org/7/2/20/, doi:10.1167/7.2.20.
34. Pelli, D. G., & Zhang, L. (1991). Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays. Vision Research, 31, 1337-1350.
35. Robson, J. G., & Graham, N. (1981). Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field. Vision Research, 21, 409-418.
36. Sagi, D., & Julesz, B. (1985). "Where" and "what" in vision. Science, 228, 1217-1219.
37. Scolari, M., Kohnen, A., Barton, B., & Awh, E. (2007). Spatial attention, preview, and popout: Which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays? Journal of Vision, 7(2):7, 1-23, http://journalofvision.org/7/2/7/, doi:10.1167/7.2.7.
38. Simons, D. J., & Ambinder, M. S. (2005). Change blindness - Theory and consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 44-48.
39. Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs, 74, 1-29.
40. Strasburger, H. (2005). Unfocused spatial attention underlies the crowding effect in indirect form vision. Journal of Vision, 5(11):8, 1024-1037, http://journalofvision.org/5/11/8/, doi:10.1167/ 5.11.8.
41. Toet, A., & Levi, D. M. (1992). The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea. Vision Research, 32, 1349-1357.
42. Tong, F., & Nakayama, K. (1999). Robust representations for faces: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1016-1035.
43. Treisman, A., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107-141.
44. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
45. Van der Lubbe, R. H., & Keuss, P. J. (2001). Focused attention reduces the effect of lateral interference in multi-element arrays. Psychological Research, 65, 107-118.
46. Wilkinson, F., Wilson, H. R., & Ellemberg, D. (1997). Lateral interactions in peripherally viewed texture arrays. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics, image science, and vision, 14, 2057-2068.
47. Wolford, G., & Shum, K. H. (1980). Evidence for feature perturbations. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 409-420.