Object substitution and its relation to other forms of visual masking

Vision Research

Volumn 44, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 1321-1331

  Enns, James T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ATTENTION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; OBJECT RELATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THEORY; VISION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL MASKING; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ATTENTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CUES; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SIZE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 1842557681     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.10.024     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Bischof W.F., Di Lollo V. Motion and metacontrast with simultaneous onset of stimuli. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 12:1995;1623-1636.
2. Breitmeyer B.G. Visual masking: An integrative approach. 1984;Oxford University Press, New York.
3. Breitmeyer B.G., Ganz L. Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing. Psychological Review. 83:1976;1-36.
4. Di Lollo V. Temporal integration in visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 109:1980;75-97.
5. Di Lollo V., Enns J.T., Rensink R.A. Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 129:2000;481-507.
6. Duncan J., Humphreys G. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review. 96:1989;433-458.
7. Enns J.T. Visual binding in the standing wave illusion. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 9:2002;489-496.
8. Enns J.T., Di Lollo V. Object substitution: A new form of masking in unattended visual locations. Psychological Science. 8:1997;135-139.
9. Enns J.T., Di Lollo V. What's new in visual masking? Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 4:2000;345-352.
10. Enns J.T., Rensink R. VScope(tm): Vision testing software for the Macintosh. 1992;Micropsych Software, Vancouver.
11. Eriksen C.W. The flankers task and response competition: A useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems. Visual Cognition. 2:1995;101-118.
12. Francis, G., (in press). Online simulations of models for backward masking. Behavior, Research Methods, Instruments & Computers.
13. Kahneman D. Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking. Psychological Bulletin. 70:1968;404-425.
14. Keppel G. Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. third ed. 1991;Academic, NY.
15. Keysers C., Perrett D.I. Visual masking and RSVP reveal neural competition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 6:2002;120-125.
16. Kolers P.A. Some psychological aspects of pattern recognition. Kolers P.A., Eden M. Recognizing patterns. 1968;MIT Press, Boston, MA.
17. Lleras A., Moore C.M. When the target becomes a mask: Using apparent motion to isolate the object component of object-substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 29:2003;106-120.
18. Michaels C.F., Turvey M.T. Central sources of visual masking: Indexing structures supporting seeing at a single, brief glance. Psychological Research. 41:1979;1-61.
19. Moore, C.M., Lleras, A., (in press). On the role of object representations in substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
20. Potter M.C. Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory. 2:1976;509-522.
21. Ramachandran V.S., Cobb S. Visual attention modulates metacontrast masking. Nature. 373:1995;66-68.
22. Shih S.-I., Sperling G. Measuring and modeling the trajectory of visual spatial attention. Psychological Review. 109:2002;260-305.
23. Spencer T.J., Shuntich R. Evidence for an interruption theory of backward masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 85:1970;198-203.
24. Sperling G. The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs. 74:1960;. (11, Whole No. 498).
25. Thorpe S.J., Fabre-Thorpe M.F. Seeking categories in the brain. Science. 291:2003;260-263.
26. Treisman A., Gelade G. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology. 12:1980;97-136.
27. Turvey M.T. On peripheral and central processes in vision: Inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli. Psychological Review. 81:1973;1-52.
28. VanRullen R., Koch C. Visual selective behavior can be triggered by a feed-forward process. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 15:2003;209-217.
29. VanRullen R., Thorpe S.J. Is it a bird? Is it a plane? Ultra-rapid visual categorization of natural and artifactual objects. Perception. 30:2001;655-668.
30. von Muehlenen, A., Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (2003). Metacontrast masking with target and mask energies equated across exposure durations. Vision Sciences Society Abstracts, 247.
31. Weisstein N., Ozog G., Szoc R. A comparison and elaboration of two models of metacontrast. Psychological Review. 82:1975;325-343.