Erratum: Unfocused spatial attention underlies the crowding effect in indirect form vision (Journal of Vision (2005) vol. 5 (11) (1024-1037) 10.1167/5.11.8));Unfocussed spatial attention underlies the crowding effect in indirect form vision

Journal of Vision

Volumn 5, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 1024-1037

  Strasburger, Hans ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attention; Character recognition; Contrast sensitivity; Peripheral vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROWDING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MENTAL TASK; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERIPHERAL VISION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHOTOSTIMULATION; VISION;

ATTENTION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CUES; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISION;

EID: 30544447217     PISSN: 15347362     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/7.3.7     Document Type: Erratum

References (69)

1. Atkinson, J., Pimm-Smith, E., Evans, C., Harding, G., & Braddick, O. (1986). Visual crowding in young children. Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceedings Series, 45, 201-213.
2. Averbach, E., & Coriell, A. S. (1961). Short-term memory in vision. Bell System Technical Journal, 40, 309-328.
3. Bach, M., Meigen, T., & Strasburger, H. (1997). Raster scan cathode ray tubes for vision research - Limits of resolution in space, time and intensity, and some solutions. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 403-414.
4. Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226, 177-178.
5. Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523-547.
6. Bundesen, C. (1998). Visual selective attention: Outlines of a choice model, a race model, and a computational theory. Visual Cognition, 5, 287-309.
7. Chung, S. T. L., Legge, G. E., & Ortiz, A. (2003). Precision of local signs in central and peripheral vision [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 3(9), 815a, http://www.journalofvision.org/3/9/815/, doi:10.1167/3.9.815.
8. Chung, S. T. L., Levi, D. M., & Legge, G. E. (2001). Spatial-frequency and contrast properties of crowding. Vision Research, 41(14), 1833-1850.
9. Crick, F. (1984). Function of the thalamic reticular complex: The searchlight hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 81(14), 4586-4590.
10. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of visual attention. Annual Reviews of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222.
11. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(1), 143-149.
12. Eriksen, C. W. (1995). The flanker task and response competition: A useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems. Visual Cognition, 2, 101-118.
13. Eriksen, C. W., & Collins, J. F. (1969). Temporal course of selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80(2), 254-261.
14. Eriksen, C. W., & Rohrbaugh, J. W. (1970). Some factors determining efficiency of selective attention. American Journal of Psychology, 83, 330-343.
15. Fine, E. M. (2001). Does meaning matter? The impact of word knowledge on lateral masking. Optometry and Vision Science, 78(11), 831-838.
16. Flom, M. C., Heath, G. G., & Takahaski, E. (1963). Contour interaction and visual resolution: Contralateral effects. Science, 142, 979-980.
17. Flom, M. C., Weymouth, F. W., & Kahnemann, D. (1963). Visual resolution and contour interaction. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 53(9), 1026-1032.
18. Fujita, I., Tanaka, K., Ito, M., & Cheng, K. (1992). Columns for visual features of objects in monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nature, 360, 343-346.
19. Gazzaniga, M. S. (Ed.). (1999). The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Bradford Book, MIT Press.
20. Geiger, G., & Lettvin, J. Y. (1989). Dyslexia and reading as examples of alternative visual strategies. In C. von Euler (Ed.), Brain and reading (pp. 331-343). London: Macmillan.
21. Harvey, L. O., Jr. (1986). Efficient estimation of sensory thresholds. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 18(6), 623-632.
22. Harvey, L. O., Jr. (1997). Efficient estimation of sensory thresholds with ML-PEST. Spatial Vision, 11(1), 121-128.
23. He, S., Cavanagh, P., & Intriligator, J. (1996). Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness. Nature, 383, 334-337.
24. Hess, R. F., Dakin, S. C., Kapoor, N., & Tewfik, M. (2000). Contour interaction in fovea and periphery. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 17(9), 1516-1524.
25. Huckauf, A., & Heller, D. (2002a). Spatial selection in peripheral letter recognition: In search of boundary conditions. Acta Psychologica, 111(1), 101-123.
26. Huckauf, A., & Heller, D. (2002b). What various kinds of errors tell us about lateral masking effects. Visual Cognition, 9(7), 889-910.
27. Huckauf, A., Heller, D., & Nazir, T. A. (1999). Lateral masking: Limitations of the feature interaction account. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(1), 177-189.
28. Jüttner, M., & Strasburger, H. (1997). FORPXL - A Fortran interface to PXL, the psychological experiments library. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 491-493.
29. Kooi, F. L., Toet, A., Tripathy, S. P., & Levi, D. M. (1994). The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. Spatial Vision, 8(2), 255-279.
30. LaBerge, D. (1995). Computational and anatomical models of selective attention in object identification. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (1st ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. LaBerge, D., & Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96(1), 101-124.
32. LeVay, S., Connolly, M., Houde, J., & Van Essen, D. (1985). The complete pattern of ocular dominance stripes in the striate cortex and visual field of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neuroscience, 5(2), 486-501.
33. Levi, D. M., Klein, S. A., & Aitsebaomo, A. P. (1985). Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification. Vision Research, 25, 963-977.
34. Mackeben, M. (1999). Sustained focal attention and peripheral letter recognition. Spatial Vision, 12(1), 51-72.
35. Nakayama, K., & Mackeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Research, 29(11), 1631-1647.
36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.
37. Nazir, T. A. (1992). Effects of lateral masking and spatial precueing on gap-resolution in central and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 32(4), 771-777.
38. Pelli, D. G., Palomares, M., & Majaj, N. J. (2004). Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: Distinguishing feature integration from detection. Journal of Vision, 4(12), 1136-1169. http://journalofvision.org/4/12/12, doi:10.1167/4.12.12.
39. Schneider, W. X., & Mojzisch, A. (2001). Visuelle Aufmerksamkeit und Kognitive Neurowissenschaft: Befunde und Mechanismen. [Visual attention and cognitive neuroscience: Findings and mechanisms]. In M. Eimer & T. Goschke (Eds.), Enzyklopädie der psychologie: Band kognitive neurowissenschaft. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
40. Skinner, J. E., & Yingling, C. D. (1977). Central gating mechanisms that regulate event-related potentials and behavior. In J. E. Desmedt (Ed.), Progress in clinical neurophysiology: Attention, voluntary contraction and event-related cerebral potentials (Vol. 1, pp. 30-69). Basel: Karger.
41. Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs, 74(11).
42. Stoffer, T. H. (1988). Dynamische Aspekte der visuellen Aufmerksamkeit. Funktionelle Charakteristika der Fokus-sieränderung vom Typ "Gummilinse" und ihre Beteiligung an der Entstehung der Dominanz globaler über lokale Merkmale. Habilitationsschrift, Universität Bielefeld.
43. Stoffer, T. H. (1994). Attentional zooming and the global-dominance phenomenon: Effects of level-specific cueing and abrupt visual onset. Psychological Research, 56(2), 83-98.
44. Strasburger, H. (1997). R_Contrast: Rapid measurement of recognition contrast thresholds. Spatial Vision, 10(4), 495-498.
45. Strasburger,, H. (2001a). Converting between measures of slope of the psychometric function. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(8, special issue Psychometric Functions and Adaptive Methods), 1348-1355.
46. Strasburger, H. (2001b). Invariance of the psychometric function for letter recognition across the visual field. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(8, special issue Psychometric Functions and Adaptive Methods), 1356-1376.
47. Strasburger, H. (2003a). A generalized cortical magnification rule predicts low-contrast letter recognition in the visual field [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 3(9), 653a, http://www.journalofvision.org/3/9/653/, doi:10.1167/3.9.653.
48. Strasburger, H. (2003b). Indirektes Sehen. Formerkennung im zentralen und peripheren Gesichtsfeld. Göttingen, Bern, Toronto, Seattle: Hogrefe.
49. Strasburger, H., Gothe, J., & Lutz, K. (2000). The healthy visual field of recognition [Abstract]. Perception, 29 (Suppl.), 84-85.
50. Strasburger, H., Harvey, L. O. J., & Rentschler, I. (1991). Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 495-508.
51. Strasburger, H., & Poggel, D. A. (2002). The visual crowding effect is caused, in part, by unfocussed spatial attention. Paper presented at the Cognitive Neuroscience Society (CNS 2002), San Francisco.
52. Strasburger, H., & Rentschler, I. (1995). Is the crowding effect of purely attentional origin? Perception, 24(Suppl.), 77.
53. Strasburger, H., & Rentschler, I. (1996). Contrast-dependent dissociation of visual recognition and detection field. European Journal of Neuroscience, 8, 1787-1791.
54. Strasburger, H., Rentschler, I., & Harvey, L. O., Jr. (1994). Cortical magnification theory fails to predict visual recognition. European Journal of Neuroscience, 6, 1583-1587.
55. Stuart, J. A., & Burian, H. M. (1962). A study of separation difficulty: Its relationship to visual acuity in normal and amblyopic eyes. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 53, 471-477.
56. Tanaka, K. (1996). Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 19, 109-139.
57. Tjan, B., & Chung, S. T. L. (2004). Form vision in the periphery [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 4(11), 88a, http://www.journalofvision.org/4/11/88/, doi:10.1167/4.11.88.
58. Toet, A., & Levi, D. M. (1992). The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea. Vision Research, 32(7), 1349-1357.
59. Tripathy, S. P., & Levi, D. M. (1994). Long-range dichoptic interactions in the human visual cortex in the region corresponding to the blind spot. Vision Research, 34(9), 1127-1138.
60. Tsal, Y., & Lavie, N. (1988). Attending to color and shape: The special role of location in selective visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 44(1), 15-21.
61. Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (1994). 'What' and 'where' in the human brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 4, 157-165.
62. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale & R. J. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
63. van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1987). Central selection in vision. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 421-446). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1992). Selective attention in vision. London, New York: Routledge.
65. Vidyasagar, T. R. (1998). Gating of neuronal responses in macaque primary visual cortex by an attentional spotlight. NeuroReport, 9, 1947-1952.
66. Vidyasagar, T. R. (2001). From attentional gating in macaque primary visual cortex to dyslexia in humans. Progress in Brain Research, 134, 297-312.
67. von Helmholtz, H. (1871). Über die Zeit, welche nötig ist, damit ein Gesichtseindruck zurn Bewusstsein kommt. Berliner Monatsberichte, Juni, 333-337.
68. Weymouth, F. W. (1958). Visual sensory units and the minimal angle of resolution. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 46, 102-113.
69. Wilkinson, F., Wilson, H. R., & Ellemberg, D. (1997). Lateral interactions in peripherally viewed texture arrays. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 14(9), 2057-2068.