Crowding Changes Appearance

Current Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 496-501

  Greenwood, John A ^a   Bex, Peter J ^a,b   Dakin, Steven C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

SYSNEURO

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; VISION;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISION, OCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77949485012     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.01.023     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Flom M.C., Weymouth F.W., and Kahneman D. Visual resolution and contour interaction. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 53 (1963) 1026-1032
2. Bouma H. Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature 226 (1970) 177-178
3. Levi D.M. Crowding-an essential bottleneck for object recognition: A mini-review. Vision Res. 48 (2008) 635-654
4. Pelli D.G., and Tillman K.A. The uncrowded window of object recognition. Nat. Neurosci. 11 (2008) 1129-1135
5. Wilkinson F., Wilson H.R., and Ellemberg D. Lateral interactions in peripherally viewed texture arrays. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 14 (1997) 2057-2068
6. Martelli M., Majaj N.J., and Pelli D.G. Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts. J. Vis. 5 (2005) 58-70
7. Bex P.J., and Dakin S.C. Spatial interference among moving targets. Vision Res. 45 (2005) 1385-1398
8. van den Berg R., Roerdink J.B.T.M., and Cornelissen F.W. On the generality of crowding: Visual crowding in size, saturation, and hue compared to orientation. J. Vis. 7 (2007) 1-11
9. Greenwood J.A., Bex P.J., and Dakin S.C. Positional averaging explains crowding with letter-like stimuli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 (2009) 13130-13135
10. Toet A., and Levi D.M. The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea. Vision Res. 32 (1992) 1349-1357
11. Krumhansl C.L., and Thomas E.A.C. Effect of level of confusability on reporting letters from briefly presented visual displays. Percept. Psychophys. 21 (1977) 269-279
12. Chastain G. Inhibition of feature extraction with multiple instances of the target feature in different orientations. Psychol. Res. 43 (1981) 45-56
13. He S., Cavanagh P., and Intriligator J. Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness. Nature 383 (1996) 334-337
14. Petrov Y., and Popple A.V. Crowding is directed to the fovea and preserves only feature contrast. J. Vis. 7 (2007) 1-9
15. Intriligator J., and Cavanagh P. The spatial resolution of visual attention. Cognit. Psychol. 43 (2001) 171-216
16. Parkes L., Lund J., Angelucci A., Solomon J.A., and Morgan M. Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision. Nat. Neurosci. 4 (2001) 739-744
17. Pelli D.G., Palomares M., and Majaj N.J. Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: Distinguishing feature integration from detection. J. Vis. 4 (2004) 1136-1169
18. Hess R.F., Dakin S.C., Kapoor N., and Tewfik M. Contour interaction in fovea and periphery. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 17 (2000) 1516-1524
19. Kooi F.L., Toet A., Tripathy S.P., and Levi D.M. The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. Spat. Vis. 8 (1994) 255-279
20. Wolford G. Perturbation model for letter identification. Psychol. Rev. 82 (1975) 184-199
21. Chastain G. Feature mislocalizations and misjudgments of intercharacter distance. Psychol. Res. 44 (1982) 51-65
22. Strasburger H., Harvey Jr. L.O., and Rentschler I. Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view. Percept. Psychophys. 49 (1991) 495-508
23. Huckauf A., and Heller D. What various kinds of errors tell us about lateral masking effects. Vis. Cogn. 9 (2002) 889-910
24. Nandy A.S., and Tjan B.S. The nature of letter crowding as revealed by first- and second-order classification images. J. Vis. 7 (2007) 1-26
25. Dakin S.C., Bex P.J., Cass J.R., and Watt R.J. Dissociable effects of attention and crowding on orientation averaging. J. Vis. 9 (2009) 1-16
26. Freeman J., and Pelli D.G. An escape from crowding. J. Vis. 7 (2007) 1-14
27. Kanai R., and Verstraten F.A.J. Visual transients without feature changes are sufficient for the percept of a change. Vision Res. 44 (2004) 2233-2240
28. Rensink R.A. Change detection. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 53 (2002) 245-277
29. Levi D.M., Hariharan S., and Klein S.A. Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in peripheral vision: Peripheral crowding is neither size invariant nor simple contrast masking. J. Vis. 2 (2002) 167-177
30. Polat U., and Sagi D. The architecture of perceptual spatial interactions. Vision Res. 34 (1994) 73-78
31. Chung S.T.L., Legge G.E., and Tjan B.S. Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification in central and peripheral vision. Vision Res. 42 (2002) 2137-2152
32. Pantle A. How do measures of the motion aftereffect measure up?. In: Mather G., Verstraten F., and Anstis S. (Eds). The Motion Aftereffect: A Modern Perspective (1998), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 25-39
33. Clifford C.W.G. Perceptual adaptation: Motion parallels orientation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6 (2002) 136-143
34. Muir D., and Over R. Tilt aftereffects in central and peripheral vision. J. Exp. Psychol. 85 (1970) 165-170
35. McGraw P.V., and Roach N.W. Centrifugal propagation of motion adaptation effects across visual space. J. Vis. 8 (2008) 1-11
36. Strasburger H. Unfocused spatial attention underlies the crowding effect in indirect form vision. J. Vis. 5 (2005) 1024-1037
37. Põder E. Crowding with detection and coarse discrimination of simple visual features. J. Vis. 8 (2008) 1-6
38. Fitzpatrick D. Seeing beyond the receptive field in primary visual cortex. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 10 (2000) 438-443
39. Blake R., Tadin D., Sobel K.V., Raissian T.A., and Chong S.C. Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 (2006) 4783-4788
40. Motter B.C. Central V4 receptive fields are scaled by the V1 cortical magnification and correspond to a constant-sized sampling of the V1 surface. J. Neurosci. 29 (2009) 5749-5757
41. Felleman D.J., and Van Essen D.C. Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cereb. Cortex 1 (1991) 1-47
42. Walls G.L. The filling-in process. Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom. 31 (1954) 329-341
43. Ramachandran V.S., and Gregory R.L. Perceptual filling in of artificially induced scotomas in human vision. Nature 350 (1991) 699-702
44. Crossland M.D., and Bex P.J. The twinkle aftereffect is pre-cortical and is independent of filling-in. J. Vis. 8 (2008) 1-10
45. De Weerd P., Desimone R., and Ungerleider L.G. Perceptual filling-in: A parametric study. Vision Res. 38 (1998) 2721-2734
46. Tripathy S.P., and Levi D.M. Long-range dichoptic interactions in the human visual cortex in the region corresponding to the blind spot. Vision Res. 34 (1994) 1127-1138
47. Dakin S.C., and Watt R.J. The computation of orientation statistics from visual texture. Vision Res. 37 (1997) 3181-3192
48. Portilla J., and Simoncelli E.P. A parametric texture model based on joint statistics of complex wavelet coefficients. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 40 (2000) 49-71
49. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spat. Vis. 10 (1997) 433-436
50. Efron B., and Tibshirani R.J. An Introduction to the Bootstrap (1993), Chapman & Hall, London