Crowding and surround suppression: Not to be confused

Journal of Vision

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2007, Pages

  Petrov, Yury ^a   Popple, Ariella V ^b   McKee, Suzanne P ^c  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c SMITH KETTLEWELL EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Anisotropy; Crowding; Surround suppression

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISION; VISUAL FIELD;

ANISOTROPY; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; HUMANS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 34247869840     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/7.2.12     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Adams,. D. L., & Horton, J. C. (2003). A precise retinotopic map of primate striate cortex generated from the representation of angioscotomas. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 3771-3789. [PubMed] [Article]
2. Andriessen, J. J., & Bouma, H. (1976). Eccentric vision: Adverse interactions between line segments. Vision Research, 16, 71-78. [PubMed]
3. Banks, W. P., Larson, D. W., & Prinzmetal, W. (1979). Asymmetry of visual interference. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 447-456. [PubMed]
4. Bex, P. J., Dakin, S. C., & Simmers, A. J. (2003). The shape and size of crowding for moving targets. Vision Research, 43, 2895-2904. [PubMed]
5. Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226, 177-178. [PubMed]
6. Bouma, H. (1973). Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. Vision Research, 13, 767-782. [PubMed]
7. Chastain, G. (1982). Confusability and interference between members of parafoveal letter pairs. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 576-580. [PubMed]
8. Chung, S. T., Levi, D. M., & Legge, G. E. (2001). Spatial-frequency and contrast properties of crowding. Vision Research, 41, 1833-1850. [PubMed]
9. Flom, M. C., Weymouth, F. W., & Kahneman, D. (1963). Visual resolution and contour interaction. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 53, 1026-1032. [PubMed]
10. He, S., Cavanagh, P., & Intrilligator, J. (1996). Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness. Nature, 383, 334-337. [PubMed]
11. Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1965). Receptive fields and functional architecture in two nonstriate visual areas (18 and 19) of the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology, 28, 229-289. [PubMed]
12. Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1968). Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. The Journal of Physiology, 195, 215-243. [PubMed] [Article]
13. Kontsevich, L.L., & Tyler, C. W. (1999). Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold. Vision Research, 39, 2729-2737. [PubMed]
14. Kooi, F. L., Toet, A., Tripathy, S. P., & Levi, D. M. (1994). The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. Spatial Vision, 8, 255-279. [PubMed]
15. Krumhansl, C. L. (1977). Naming and locating simultaneously and sequentially presented letters. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 293-302.
16. Levi, D. M., Hariharan, S., & Klein, S. A. (2002). Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in peripheral vision: Peripheral crowding is neither size invariant nor simple contrast masking. Journal of Vision, 2(2):3, 167-177, http://journalofvision.org/2/ 2/3/, doi:10.1167/2.2.3. [PubMed] [Article]
17. Neri, P., & Levi, D. M. (2006). Spatial resolution for feature binding is impaired in peripheral and amblyopic vision. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96, 142-153. [PubMed]
18. Pelli, D. G., Palomares, M., & Majaj, N. J. (2004). Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: Distinguishing feature integration from detection. Journal of Vision, 4(12):12, 1136-1169, http://journalofvision.org/4/12/12/, doi:10.1167/4.12.12. [PubMed] [Article]
19. Petrov, Y., Carandini, M., & McKee, S. (2005). Two distinct mechanisms of suppression in human vision. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 8704-8707. [PubMed] [Article]
20. Petrov, Y., Carandini, M., & McKee, S. P. (2006). The time course of contrast masking reveals two distinct mechanisms of human surround suppression [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 6(6):808, 808a, http://journalofvision.org/6/6/808/, doi:10.1167/6.6.808.
21. Petrov, Y., & McKee, S. P. (2006). The effect of spatial configuration on surround suppression of contrast sensitivity. Journal of Vision, 6(3):4, 224-238, http://journalofvision.org/ 6/3/4/, doi:10.1167/6.3.4. [PubMed] [Article]
22. Petrov, Y., Verghese, P., & McKee, S. P. (2006). Collinear facilitation is largely uncertainty reduction. Journal of Vision, 6(2):8, 170-178, http://journalofvision.org/6/2/8/, doi: 10.1167/6.2.8. [PubMed] [Article]
23. Schira, M. M., Kontsevich, L. L., & Tyler, C. W. (2005). Geometric and metric properties of visual areas V1and V2 in humans [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 5(8):897, 897a, http://journalofvision.org/5/ 8/897/, doi:10.1167/5.8.897.
24. Snowden, R. J., & Hammett, S. T. (1998). The effects of surround contrast on contrast thresholds, perceived contrast and contrast discrimination. Vision Research, 38, 1935-1945. [PubMed]
25. Strasburger, H., Harvey, L. O., Jr., & Rentschler, I. (1991). Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 495-508. [PubMed]
26. Stuart, J. A., & Burian, H. M. (1962). A study of separation difficulty. Its relationship to visual acuity in normal and amblyopic eyes. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 53, 471-477. [PubMed]
27. Toet, A., & Levi, D. M. (1992). The two-dimensional shape of spatial interaction zones in the parafovea. Vision Research, 32, 1349-1357. [PubMed]
28. Tootell, R. B., Switkes, E., Silverman, M. S., & Hamilton, S. L. (1988). Functional anatomy of Macaque striate cortex: II. Retinotopic organization. Journal of Neuroscience, 8, 1531-1568. [PubMed] [Article]
29. Tripathy, S. P., & Cavanagh, P. (2002). The extent of crowding in peripheral vision does not scale with target size. Vision Research, 42, 2357-2369. [PubMed]
30. Van Essen, D. C., Newsome, W. T., & Maunsell, J. H. (1984). The visual field representation in striate cortex of the macaque monkey: Asymmetries, anisotropies, and individual variability. Vision Research, 24, 429-448. [PubMed]