Response to Intervention in Canada: Definitions, the Evidence Base, and Future Directions

Canadian Journal of School Psychology

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 18-43

  McIntosh, Kent ^a   MacKay, Leslie D ^a   Andreou, Theresa ^a   Brown, Jacqueline A ^b   Mathews, Susanna ^a   Gietz, Carmen ^a   Bennett, Joanna L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

academics; Canada; intervention; prevention; progress monitoring; research; response to intervention; schoolwide intervention; three tier model

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953065874     PISSN: 08295735     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0829573511400857     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Alberta Education. (2009). Setting the direction framework. Edmonton, Canada: Author.
2. Baker, S.K., & Good, R. (1995). Curriculum-based measurement of English reading with bilingual Hispanic students: A validation study with second-grade students. School Psychology Review, 24, 561-578.
3. Barth, A.E., Stuebing, K.K., Anthony, J.L., Denton, C.A., Mathes, P.G., Fletcher, J.M., & Francisa, D.J. (2008). Agreement among response to intervention criteria for identifying responder status. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 296-307.
4. Batsche, G., Elliott, J., Graden, J.L., Grimes, J., Kovaleski, J.F., Prasse, D.,. . Tilly, W.D., III (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
5. Baydala, L., Rasmussen, C., Birch, J., Sherman, J., Wikman, E., Charchun, J., & Bisanz, J. (2009). Self-beliefs and behavioural development as related to academic achievement in Canadian Aboriginal Children. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 24, 19-33.
6. Bohanon, H., Fenning, P., Carney, K.L., Minnis-Kim, M.J., Anderson-Harriss, S., Moroz, K.B.,. . Piggott, T.D. (2006). Schoolwide application of positive behavior support in an urban high school: A case study. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8(3), 131-145.
7. Braden, J.P., & Shaw, S.R. (2009). Intervention validity of cognitive assessment: Knowns, unknowables, and unknowns. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34, 106-115.
8. British Columbia Association of School Psychologists. (2009). Explanations of professional qualifications. Retrieved from http://www.bcasp.ca/cms_pdfs/FORM%202%20-%20Rev.pdf.
9. British Columbia Ministry of Education. (2010). Special education services: A manual of policies, procedures and guidelines. Victoria, Canada: Author.
10. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513-531.
11. Burns, M.K., Marolt, D., Kahler, M., Buxton, R., & Lillenstein, D. (2008). Practitioner perspectives on the effect of RtI. Communiqué, 36(8), 1, 7-9.
12. Burns, M.K., & Riley-Tillman, T.C. (2009). Response to intervention and eligibility decisions: We need to wait to succeed. NASP Communique, 38(1), 1, 10-11.
13. Chapman, D., & Hofweber, C. (2000). Effective behavior support in British Columbia. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2, 235-237.
14. Corkum, P., French, F., & Dorey, H. (2007). School psychology in Nova Scotia. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 22, 108-120.
15. Crone, D.A., Hawken, L.S., & Horner, R.H. (2010). Responding to problem behavior in schools: The Behavior Education Program (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
16. Deshler, D.D., Schumaker, J.B., Lenz, B.K., Bulgren, J.A., Hock, M.F., Knight, J., & Ehren, B.J. (2001). Ensuring content-area learning by secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 96-108.
17. Education Act, 1995, S.S. 1995, c. E-0.2 (1995).
18. Elizalde-Utnick, G. (2008). Using the response to intervention framework with English language learners. NASP Communique, 37(3), 18-21.
19. Espin, C., Wallace, T., Campbell, H., Lembke, E.S., Long, J.D., & Ticha, R. (2008). Curriculum-based measurement in writing: Predicting the success of high-school students on state standards tests. Exceptional Children, 74, 174-193.
20. Fien, H., Baker, S.K., Smolkowski, K., Smith, J.L.M., Kame'enui, E.J., & Beck, C.T. (2008). Using Nonsense Word Fluency to predict reading proficiency in kindergarten through second grade for English learners and native English speakers. School Psychology Review, 37, 391-408.
21. Flanagan, D. P., & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.). (2005). Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues. New York, NY:Guilford.
22. Fletcher, J.M., Francis, D.J., Morris, R.D., & Lyon, G.R. (2005). Evidence-based assessment of learning disabilities in children and adolescents assessment of learning disabilities in children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 506-522.
23. Fletcher, J.M., Francis, D.J., Shaywitz, S.E., Lyon, G.R., Foorman, B.R., Stuebing, K.K., & Shaywitz, B.A. (1998). Intelligent testing and the discrepancy model for children with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 186-203.
24. Fletcher, J.M., Lyon, G.R., Barnes, M., Stuebing, K.K., Francis, D.J., Olson, R.K.,. . Shaywitz, B.A. (2002). Classification of learning disabilities: An evidence-based evaluation. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 185-250). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Fletcher, J.M., & Vaughn, S. (2009). Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 30-37.
26. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., & Burish, P. (2000). Peer-assisted learning strategies: An evidence-based practice to promote reading achievement. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 85-91.
27. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P.L., & Young, C.L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 157-171.
28. Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (2008). Best practices in progress monitoring reading and mathematics at the elementary grades. In A. Thomas & J. P. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 2147-2164). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
29. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Compton, D.L. (2010). Rethinking response to intervention at middle and high school. School Psychology Review, 39, 22-28.
30. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 27-27.
31. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Powell, S.R., Seethaler, P.M., Cirino, P.T., & Fletcher, J.M. (2008). Intensive intervention for students with mathematics disabilities: Seven principles of effective practice. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 79-92.
32. Good, C., McIntosh, K., & Gietz, C. (in press). Integrating bullying prevention into Schoolwide Positive Behaviour Support. Teaching Exceptional Children.
33. Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2010). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (Next ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Education Achievement. Retrieved from http://dibels.uoregon.edu.
34. Good, R.H., Wallin, J., Simmons, D.C., Kame'enui, E.J., & Kaminski, R.A. (2002). System-wide percentile ranks for DIBELS benchmark assessment (Technical Report 9). Eugene: University of Oregon Press. Retrieved from http://dibels.uoregon.edu/techreports/DIBELS_Percentiles.pdf.
35. Gordon, R.S. (1983). An operational classification of disease prevention. Public Health Reports, 98, 107-109.
36. Graham, S. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools: A report to the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
37. Hagans, K.S. (2008). A response-to-intervention approach to decreasing early literacy differences in first graders from different socioeconomic backgrounds: Evidence for the intervention validity of DIBELS. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34, 35-42.
38. Hale, J.B. (2008). Response to intervention: Guidelines for parents and practitioners. Wrightslaw. Retrieved from http://www.wrightslaw.com/idea/art/rti.hale.pdf.
39. Hall, G.E., & Hord, S.M. (2006). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
40. Harris, G.E., & Joy, R.M. (2010). Educational psychologists' perspectives on their professional practice in Newfoundland and Labrador. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 25, 205-220.
41. Hayes, M. (1989). Integration: A review of current literature. SSTA Research Centre Report 185. Regina, Canada: Saskatchewan Instructional Development and Research Unit. Retrieved from http://www.saskschoolboards.ca/old/ResearchAndDevelopment/ResearchReport s/StudentsDiverseNeeds/185.htm.
42. Helms, J.E. (1997). The triple quandary of race, culture, and social class in standardized cognitive ability testing. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 517-532). New York, NY: Guilford.
43. Horner, R.H., Sugai, G., Todd, A.W., & Lewis-Palmer, T. (2005). School-wide positive behavior support. In L. Bambara & L. Kern (Eds.), Individualized supports for students with problem behaviors: Designing positive behavior plans (pp. 359-390). New York, NY: Guilford.
44. Human Early Learning Partnership. (2009). EDI mapping package, 2008-2009: School district 59, 60 & 81. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Author.
45. Jaeggi, S.M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J., & Perrig, W.J. (2008). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 6829-6833.
46. Jordan, J.J., Hindes, Y.L., & Saklofske, D.H. (2009). School psychology in Canada: A survey of roles and functions, challenges and aspirations. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 24, 245-264.
47. Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S.R. (2000). What definitions of learning disability say and don't say: A critical analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 239-256.
48. Kershaw, P.W., Irwin, L., Trafford, K., & Hertzman, C. (2005). The British Columbia atlas of child development. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Human Early Learning Partnership.
49. Kozey, M., & Siegel, L.S. (2008). Definitions of learning disabilities in Canadian provinces and territories. Canadian Psychology, 49, 162-171.
50. Kranzler, J.H., Flores, C.G., & Coady, M. (2010). Examination of the cross-battery approach for the cognitive assessment of children and youth from diverse linguistic and cultural backgrounds. School Psychology Review, 39, 431-446.
51. Lau, Y.M., Sieler, J.D., Muysken, A.C., Vankeuren, B., & Marston, D. (2006). Perspectives on the use of problem-solving model from the viewpoint of a school psychologist, administrator, and a teacher from a large Midwest urban school district. Psychology in Schools, 43, 117-127.
52. Linan-Thompson, S., Cirino, P., & Vaughn, S. (2007). Determining English language learners' response to intervention: Questions and some answers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30, 185-195.
53. Linan-Thompson, S., Vaughn, S., Prater, K., & Cirino, P. (2006). The response to intervention of English language learners at risk for reading problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 390.
54. Loeber, R., & Dishion, T. (1983). Early predictors of male delinquency: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 68-99.
55. Lovett, M.W., De Palma, M., Frijters, J., Steinbach, K., Temple, M., Benson, N.,et al.(2008). Interventions for reading difficulties: A comparison of response to intervention by ELL and EFL struggling readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 333-352.
56. Marsh, H.W., & Yeung, A.S. (1997). Causal effects of academic self-concept on academic achievement: Structural equation models of longitudinal data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 41-54.
57. McGee, R., Prior, M., Williams, S., Smart, D., & Sanson, A. (2002). The long-term significance of teacher-rated hyperactivity and reading ability in childhood: Findings from two longitudinal studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 1004-1017.
58. McIntosh, K., Bennett, J.L., & Price, K. (in press). Evaluation of social and academic effects of school-wide positive behaviour support in a Canadian school district. Exceptionality Education International.
59. McIntosh, K., Chard, D.J., Boland, J.B., & Horner, R.H. (2006). Demonstration of combined efforts in school-wide academic and behavioral systems and incidence of reading and behavior challenges in early elementary grades. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 146-154.
60. McIntosh, K., Goodman, S., & Bohanon, H. (2010). Toward true integration of academic and behavior support. NASP Communique, 39(2), 1, 14-16.
61. McIntosh, K., Horner, R.H., Chard, D.J., Boland, J.B., & Good, R.H. (2006). The use of reading and behavior screening measures to predict non-response to school-wide positive behavior support: A longitudinal analysis. School Psychology Review, 35, 275-291.
62. McIntosh, K., Reinke, W.M., & Herman, K.E. (2009). School-wide analysis of data for social behavior problems: Assessing outcomes, selecting targets for intervention, and identifying need for support. In G. G. Peacock, R. A. Ervin, E. J. Daly, & K. W. Merrell (Eds.), The practical handbook of school psychology (pp. 135-156). New York, NY: Guilford.
63. McIntosh, K., Ty, S.V., & Turri, M.G. (2011). School-wide reading approach leads to improved literacy and behaviour. In K. McIntosh, S. V. Ty, & M. G. Turri (Eds.), Promising practices for youth in British Columbia schools (Vol. 1, pp. 4). Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia.
64. McKee, W.T., Tong, J.A., & Holmes, B.A. (2009, April). School psychologists working in collaboration with special education teachers: An RTI approach. Paper presented at the Council for Exceptional Children Conference, Seattle, WA.
65. Mureika, J.M. (2001). New Brunswick school psychology. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 16, 25-27.
66. Naglieri, J.A., & Johannes, R. (2001). Intellectual classification of Black and White children in special education programs using the WISC-III and cognitive assessment system. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 106, 359-367.
67. National Center on Response to Intervention. (2010). Evidence-based tools and interventions. Retrieved from http://www.rti4success.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view &id=20&Itemid=71.
68. Naylor, C. (2002). B.C. teachers' view of special education issues. Vancouver, Canada: British Columbia Teachers' Federation.
69. Naylor, C., & White, M. (2010). A hard day's night: So how's your worklife? Teacher, 23(1), 1, 4.
70. New Brunswick Department of Education. (2001). Guidelines for professional practice for school psychologists. Fredericton, Canada: Author.
71. O'Connor, R.E., Fulmer, D., Harty, K.R., & Bell, K.M. (2005). Layers of reading intervention in kindergarten through third grade: Changes in teaching and student outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 440-455.
72. Prifitera, A., Weiss, L.G., & Saklofske, D.H. (1998). The WISC-III in context. In A. Prifitera & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), WISC-III clinical use and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 1-38). New York, NY: Academic Press.
73. Reschly, D.J., & Tilly, W.D., III. (1999). Reform trends and system design alternatives. In D. J. Reschly, W. D. Tilly, & J. P. Grimes (Eds.), Special education in transition (pp. 19-48). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
74. Reynolds, C.R., & Shaywitz, S.E. (2009). Response to intervention: Ready or not? Or, from wait-to-fail to watch-them-fail. School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 130-145.
75. Rhodes, R.L., Ochoa, S.H., & Ortiz, S.O. (2005). Assessing culturally and lingustically diverse students: A practical guide. New York, NY: Guilford.
76. Sadler, C., & Sugai, G. (2009). Effective behavior and instructional support: A district model for early identification and prevention of reading and behavior problems. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11, 35-46.
77. Saklofske, D.H., & Grainger, J. (2001). School psychology in Saskatchewan: The end of a decade, the start of a century. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 16, 67-77.
78. Saklofske, D.H., Schwean, V.L., Bartell, R., Mureika, J.M.K., Andrews, J., Derevensky, J., & Janzen, H.L. (2007). School psychology in Canada: Past, present, and future perspectives. In T. K. Fagan & P. S. Wise (Eds.), School psychology: Past, present, and future (3rd ed., pp. 297-338). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
79. Sanche, B. (1976, October). Implementing the SEECC model of special education service delivery in rural Saskatchewan. Paper presented at the National Congress of the Council for Exceptional Children, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
80. Saskatchewan Ministry of Education. (2008). Guidelines for the practice of professional psychology in schools within Saskatchewan. Regina, Canada: Author.
81. Saskatchewan Ministry of Education. (2009). Impact assessment profile. Regina, Canada: Author.
82. Scanlon, D.M., Gelzheiser, L.M., Vellutino, F.R., Schatschneider, C., & Sweeney, J.M. (2008). Reducing the incidence of early reading difficulties: Professional development for classroom teachers versus direct interventions for children. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 346-359.
83. Shaywitz, B.A., Shaywitz, S.E., Blachman, B.A., Pugh, K.R., Fulbright, R.K., Skudlarski, P.,. . Gore, J.C. (2004). Development of left occipito-termporal systems for skilled reading following phonologically-based reading intervention in children. Biological Psychiatry, 55, 926-933.
84. Shaywitz, S.E., & Shaywitz, B.A. (2005). Dyslexia (specific reading disability). Biological Psychiatry, 57, 1301-1309.
85. Shinn, M.R. (2008). Best practices in using curriculum based measurement in a problem-solving model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 243-261). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
86. Shinn, M.R., Good, R.H., & Parker, C. (1998). Noncategorical special education services with students with severe achievement deficits. In D. J. Reschly, W. D. Tilly, & J. P. Grimes (Eds.), Functional and noncategorical identification and intervention in special education (pp. 81-106). Des Moines: State of Iowa Department of Education.
87. Simos, P.G., Fletcher, J., Sarkari, S., Billingsley, R., Denton, C., & Papanicolaou, A. (2007). Altering the brain circuits for reading through intervention: A magnetic source imaging study. Neuropsychology, 21, 485.
88. Simos, P.G., Fletcher, J.M., Bergman, E., Breier, J.I., Foorman, B.R., Castillo, E.M.,. . Papanicolaou, A.C. (2002). Dyslexia-specific brain activation profile becomes normal following successful remedial training. Neurology, 58, 1203-1213.
89. Sternberg, R.J., & Grigorenko, E.L. (2002). Difference scores in the identification of children with learning disabilities: It's time to use a different method. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 65-83.
90. Tilly, W.D. (2008). The evolution of school psychology to science-based practice: Problem-solving and the three-tiered model. In A. Thomas & J. P. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (pp. 17-36). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
91. Torgesen, J.K., Alexander, A.W., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Voeller, K.S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33-78.
92. Trzesniewski, K.H., Moffitt, T.E., & Caspi, A. (2006). Revisiting the association between reading achievement and antisocial behavior: New evidence of an environmental explanation from a twin study. Child Development, 77, 72-88.
93. VanDerHeyden, A.M., Witt, J.C., & Gilbertson, D. (2007). A multi-year evaluation of the effects of a response to intervention (RTI) model on identification of children for special education. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 225-256.
94. Vaughn, S., Cirino, P.T., Wanzek, J., Wexler, J., Fletcher, J.M., Denton, C.D.,. . Francis, D. J (2010). Response to intervention for middle school students with reading difficulties: Effects of a primary and secondary intervention. School Psychology Review, 39, 3-21.
95. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman, P. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391-409.
96. Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Small, S., & Fanuele, D.F. (2006). Response to intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between children with and without reading disabilities: Evidence for the role of kindergarten and first-grade interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 157-169.
97. Walker, H.M., Colvin, G., & Ramsey, E. (1995). Antisocial behavior in school: Strategies and best practices. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
98. Walker, H.M., Ramsey, E., & Gresham, F.M. (2005). Antisocial behavior in school: Strategies and best practices (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
99. Waterhouse, T., & Chapman, D. (2006). Effective behaviour support and school-wide discipline: A review of implementation and sustainability in BC schools. Abbotsford, BC: Institute for Safe Schools of British Columbia.
100. Watkins, M.W., Glutting, J.J., & Youngstrom, E.A. (2005). Issues in subtest profile analysis. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 251-268). New York, NY: Guilford.