The response to intervention of english language learners at risk for reading problems

Journal of Learning Disabilities

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 390-398

  Linan Thompson, Sylvia ^a   Vaughn, Sharon ^b,c   Prater, Kathryn ^d   Cirino, Paul T ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b Southland Corp   (New Zealand)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749260751     PISSN: 00222194     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00222194060390050201     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Denton, C. A., Anthony, J. L., Parker, R., & Hasbrouck, J. (2004). Effects of two tutoring programs on the English reading development of Spanish-English bilingual students. The Elementary School Journal, 104, 289-305.
2. Dickson, S. V., & Bursuck, W. D. (1999). Implementing a model for preventing reading failure: A report from the field. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14, 191-202.
3. Donovan, M. S., & Cross, C. T. (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4. Escamilla, K., Loera, M., Ruiz, O., & Rodriguez, Y. (1998). An examination of sustaining effects in Descubriendo La Lectura programs. Literacy Teaching and Learning, 3, 59-78.
5. Francis, D. J., Shaywitz, S. E., Steubing, K. K., Shaywitz, B. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curves analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 3-17.
6. Fuchs, L. S. & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 204-219.
7. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Speece, D. L. (2002). Treatment validity as a unifying construct for identifying leraning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 33-45.
8. Good, R. H., Simmons, D. C., & Smith, S. B. (1998). Effective academic interventions in the United States: Evaluating and enhancing the acquisition of early reading skills. Educational and Child Psychology, 15, 56-70.
9. Gunderson, L., & Siegel, L. S. (2001). The evils of the uses of IQ tests to define learning disabilities in first and second language learners. Reading Teacher, 55(1), 48-55.
10. Gunn, B., Biglan, A., Smolkowski, K., & Ary, D. (2000). The efficacy of supplemental instruction in decoding skills for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students in early elementary school. The Journal of Special Education, 34, 90-103.
11. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400-1487 (1997, 2004).
12. Jimenez, J. E., Siegel, L. S., & Lopez, M. R. (2003). The relationship between IQ and reading disabilities in English-speaking Canadian and Spanish children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 15-23.
13. Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437-447.
14. Klingner, J. K., & Artiles, A. (2003). When should bilingual students be in special education? Educational Leadership, 61(2), 66-71.
15. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction, Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
16. National Research Council. (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Committee on Minority Representation in Special Education, M. S. Donovan & C. T. Cross (Eds.). Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
17. Neal, J. C., & Kelly, P. R. (1999). The success of Reading Recovery for English language learners and Descubriendo La Lectura for bilingual students in California. Literacy Teaching and Learning, 2, 81-108.
18. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. P.L. 107-110. 115 STAT. 1425. U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
19. O'Connor, R. E. (2000). Increasing the intensity of intervention in kindergarten and first grade. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 43-54.
20. Ortiz, A. A., & Maldonado-Colon, E. (1986). Recognizing learning disabilities in bilingual children: How to lessen inappropriate referrals of language minority students to special education. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International, 2(1), 43-56.
21. Salend, S. J., Duhaney, L. M., & Montgomery, W. (2002). A comprehensive approach to identifying and addressing issues of disproportionate representation. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 289-299.
22. Speece, D. L. & Case, L. P. (2001). Classification in context: An alternative approach to identifying early reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 735-749.
23. Sebastián, N., Cuetos, P., Martí, M. A., & Carreiras, M. F. (2000). LEXESP: Léxico informatizado del español: Edition en CD-ROM. Barcelona, Spain: Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona.
24. Speece, D., Case, L. P., & Molloy, D. E. (2003). Responsiveness to general education instruction as the first gate to learning disabilities identification. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 147-156.
25. Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K. K. S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33-58.
26. Swanson, H. L., Hoskyn, M., & Lee, C. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York: Guilford Press.
27. Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to treatment: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 137-146.
28. Vaughn, S., & Linan-Thompson, S. (2003). Group size and time allotted to intervention: Effects for students with reading difficulties. In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 299-324). Baltimore: York Press.
29. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hick-man-Davis, P. (2003). Response to treatment as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391-410.
30. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Mathes, P. G., Cirino, P. T., Carlson, C. D., Francis, D. J., et al. (in press). Effectiveness of Spanish intervention for first-grade English language learners at-risk for reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
31. Vaughn, S., Mathes, P. G., Linan-Thompson, S., Cirino, P. T., Carlson, C. D., Francis, D., et al. (in press).Effects of English intervention for first-grade English language learners at-risk for reading problems. The Elementary School Journal,
32. Vellutino, F. R., Scanion, D. M., Sipay, E. R., Small, S. G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., et al. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601-638.
33. Woodcock, R. W. (1991). Woodcock language proficiency battery-Revised. Chicago: Riverside.
34. Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson psychoeducational battery-Revised. Chicago: Riverside.
35. Woodcock, R. W. & Muñoz-Sandoval, A. F. (1995). Woodcock language proficiency battery-Revised, Spanish form. Chicago: Riverside.
36. Zeno, S. M, Ivens, S. H., Millard, R. T., & Duwuri, R. (1995). The educator's word frequency guide. New York: Touchstone Applied Science Associates.