Ten-year reflections on mentoring sotl research in a research-intensive university

International Journal for Academic Development

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 117-129

  Hubball, Harry ^a   Clarke, Anthony ^a   Poole, Gary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Mentoring; Scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL); SoTL research outcomes

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953015415     PISSN: 1360144X     EISSN: 14701324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13601441003737758     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Allen, T.D., Eby, L.T., & Lentz, E. (2006). Mentorship behaviours and mentorship quality associated with formal mentoring programs: Closing the gap between research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 567-578.
2. Angelique, H., Kyle, K., & Taylor, E. (2002). Mentors and muses: New strategies for academic success. Innovative Higher Education, 26(3), 195-209.
3. Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S.K. (2006). Qualitative research for education. An introduction to theories and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
4. Boyer, E.L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
5. Clarke, A., & Erickson, G. (2004). The nature of teaching and learning in self-study. In J.J. Loughran, M.L. Hamilton, V. Kubler LaBoskey, & T.L. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 41-68). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
6. Clarke, A., & Erickson, G. (2008). Cohort learning and complexity thinking: The case of the CITE Teacher Education Programme. In C. Craig (Ed.), American Teacher Educators' Yearbook XVII. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
7. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2004). Practitioner inquiry, knowledge and university culture. In J.J. Loughran, M.L. Hamilton, V. Kubler LaBoskey, & T.L. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 601-650). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
8. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
9. Cox, M. (2004). Introduction to faculty learning communities. In M. Cox & L. Richlin (Eds.), Building faculty learning communities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 97 (pp. 5-24). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10. D'Andrea, V. (2006). Exploring methodological issues related to pedagogical inquiry in higher education. In C. Kreber (Ed.), Exploring research-based teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 107 (pp. 3-10). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11. Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, pedagogy and research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Elen, J., Lindblom-Ylanne, S., & Clement, M. (2007). Faculty development in researchintensive universities: The role of academics' conceptions on the relationship between research and teaching. International Journal for Academic Development, 12(2), 123-139.
13. Feldman, A., Paugh, P., & Mills, G. (2004). Self-study through action research. In. J.J. Loughran, M.L. Hamilton, V. Kubler LaBoskey, & T.L. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 943-978). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
14. Gurung, R.A.R., & Schwartz, B.M. (2009). Optimizing teaching and learning: Practicing pedagogical research. New York: Wiley-Blackwell Publishers.
15. Hansman, C.A. (2001). Context-based adult learning. In S.B. Merriam (Ed.), The new update on adult learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 89 (pp. 43-51). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16. Hubball, H.T., & Albon, S. (2007). Developing a faculty learning community: Enhancing the scholarship of teaching, learning and curriculum practice. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 18(2), 119-142.
17. Hubball, H.T., & Burt, H.D. (2006). Scholarship of teaching and learning: Theory practice integration in Faculty Certificate Programs. Innovative Higher Education, 30(5), 327-344.
18. Hubball, H.T., & Clarke, A. In press. Diverse methodological approaches and considerations for conducting the scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning.
19. Hubball, H.T., Clarke, A., & Beach, A. (2004). Assessing faculty learning communities. In M.D. Cox, & L. Richlin (Eds.), Building faculty learning communities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 97 (pp. 87-100). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20. Hubball, H.T., & Pearson, M.L. (2009). Curriculum leadership portfolios: Enhancing scholarly approaches to undergraduate program reform. Transformative Dialogues, 3(2), 1-16.
21. Hubball, H.T., & Poole, G. (2004). Learning-centred education to meet the diverse needs and circumstances of university faculty through an eight-month programme on teaching and learning in higher education. International Journal for Academic Development, 8(2), 11-24.
22. Huber, M.T. (2006). Disciplines, pedagogy, and inquiry-based learning about teaching. In C.Kreber (Ed.), Exploring research-based teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 107 (pp. 63-72). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23. Hutchings, P. (2002). Ethics of inquiry: Issues in the scholarship of teaching and learning. Menlo Park, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning.
24. Kamvounias, P., McGrath-Champ, S., & Yip, J. (2008). 'Gifts' in mentoring: Mentees' reflections on an academic development program. International Journal for Academic Development, 13(1), 17-25.
25. Kreber, C. (2006). Research-based practice in relation to academic practice: Some insights resulting from previous chapters. In C. Kreber (Ed.), Exploring research-based teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 107 (pp. 109-114). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26. Kubler LaBoskey, V. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J.J. Loughran, M.L. Hamilton, V. Kubler LaBoskey, & T.L. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 817-870). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
27. Langhout, R.D. (2003). Reconceptualizing quantitative and qualitative methods: A case study dealing with place as an exemplar. American Journal of Community Psychology, 32(3-4), 229-244.
28. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. McKinney, K., & Cross, P. (2007). Enhancing learning through the scholarship of teaching and learning: The challenges and joys of juggling. Boston, MA: JB Anker Series, Wiley and Sons.
31. Merriam, S.B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
32. Norton, L.S. (2009). Action research in teaching and learning. A practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities. Abingdon: Routledge.
33. Palys, T. (2003). Research decisions: Quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Toronto: Harcourt Brace.
34. Poole, G., Taylor, L., & Thompson, J. (2007). Using the scholarship of teaching and learning at disciplinary, national and institutional levels to strategically improve the quality of post-secondary education (invited essay). International Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 1-16.
35. Richlin, L., & Cox, M. (2004). Developing scholarly teaching and the scholarship of teaching and learning through faculty learning communities. In M. Cox & L. Richlin (Eds.), Building faculty learning communities, New Directions for Teaching and Learning 97 (pp. 127-136). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
36. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97-118). New York: Cambridge University Press.
37. Senge, P.M., & Scharmer, C.O. (2008). Community action research: Learning as a community of practitioners, consultants and researchers. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: The concise paperback edition (pp. 195-206). Portland, OR:Sage.
38. Stes, A., Clement, M., & Van Petegem, P. (2007). The effectiveness of a faculty training programme: Long-term and institutional impact. International Journal for Academic Development, 12(2), 99-109.
39. The University of British Columbia. (2004). TREK 2010: A global journey. Vancouver: President's Office, UBC Press.
40. The University of British Columbia. (2009). Guide to reappointment, promotion and tenure procedures at UBC for 2008/09. Vancouver: Faculty Relations, Human Resources, UBC Press.
41. Vaughan, N. (2004). Technology in support of faculty learning communities. In M. Cox & L. Richlin (Eds.), Building faculty learning communities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 97 (pp. 101-110). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
42. Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2006, January). A review of research on professional learning communities: What do we know? Paper presented at the National School Reform Faculty Research Forum, Denver, Colorado.
43. Warhurst, R.P. (2006). 'We really felt part of something': Participatory learning among peers within a university teaching-development community of practice. International Journal for Academic Development, 11(2), 111-122.
44. Zellers, D.F., Howard, V.M., & Barcic, M.A. (2008). Faculty mentoring programs: Reenvisioning rather than reinventing the wheel. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 552-588.