The scholarship of teaching and learning: Theory-practice integration in a faculty certificate program

Innovative Higher Education

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 327-344

  Hubball, Harry T ^a   Burt, Helen ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences   (Japan)

Author keywords

Faculty certificate program; Program development and evaluation framework; Scholarship of teaching and learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645294345     PISSN: 07425627     EISSN: 15731758     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10755-005-9000-6     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Altrichter, H., Psch, P., & Somekh, B. (1993). Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to the methods of action research. London, England: Routledge.
2. Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (pp. 58-59). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3. Asmar, C. (2002). Strategies to enhance learning and teaching in a research-extensive university. International Journal for Academic Development, 7(1), 18-29.
4. Baird, L. L. (1996). Documenting student outcomes in graduate and professional programs. In A. E. Bilder & C. F. Conrad (Eds.), Challenges in assessing outcomes in graduate and professional education (pp. 77-87). New Directions For Institutional Research, Vol. 92. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5. Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(6), 13-25.
6. Baum, C., & Baum, D. (1996). A national scheme to develop and accredit university teachers. The International Journal for Academic. Development, 1(2), 51-58.
7. Beaudry, M. L., & Schaub, T. (1998). The learning-centred syllabus. The Teaching Professor, 12(2), 5.
8. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992) Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
9. Boud, D. (1996). Experience as the base for learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 12(1), 33-44.
10. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
11. Brew, A., & Boud, D. (1996). Preparing for new academic roles: A holistic approach to development. The International Journal for Academic Development, 1(2), 17-25.
12. British Columbia Ministry of Education, Skills and Training (1995). Curriculum Documents: Integrated Resource Packages, Victoria, BC, Canada: BC Curriculum Office.
13. Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14. Bullough, R., & Pinnegar, S. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 13-21.
15. Clarke, A., & Hubball, H. T. (2001). Physical education methods course as an immersion experience in an elementary setting. Avante, 7(2), 11-27.
16. Cox, M. (2001). Faculty learning communities. Change agents for transforming institutions into learning organizations. In D. Lieberman & C. Wehlburg (Eds.), To improve the academy, 19 (pp. 69-93). Bolton, MA: Anker.
17. Cox, M. (2003). Proven faculty development tools that foster the scholarship of teaching in faculty learning communities. In C. Wehlburg & S. Chadwick (Eds.), To improve the academy, 21 (pp. 109-142). Bolton, MA: Anker.
18. Cunsolo, J. M., Elrick, M., Middleton, A. L. A., & Roy, D. (1996). The scholarship of teaching: A Canadian perspective. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 26, 35-56.
19. Diamond, R. M. (1998). Developing and assessing courses and curricula. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20. Fullan, M. G. (1991). Causes/processes of implementation and continuation. In M. G. Fullan (Ed.), The meaning of educational change. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
21. Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York, NY: Basic Books.
22. Gibbs, G. (1998). The preparation of university teachers in Europe and Australasia. In J. Forrest-Campion (Ed.), University teaching: International perspectives (pp. 16-41). Boston, MA: Brock.
23. Green, L. W., & Kreuter, M. W. (1999). Health promotion planning: An educational and ecological approach. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
24. Guskey, T. R., & Sparks, D. (1996). Exploring the relationship between staff development and improvements in student learning. Journal of Staff Development, 17(4), 34-38.
25. Hansman, C. A. (2001). Context-based adult learning. In S. B. Merriam (Ed.), The new update on adult learning theory, (pp. 43-51). New directions for adult and continuing education, Vol. 89. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26. Hinett, K., & Thomas, J. (1999). Staff guide to self and peer-assessment. Oxford, England: The Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxonian Rewley Press Ltd.
27. Hubball, H. T. (2001). Integrating action research into the teaching and learning process: Lessons learned in coaching and teacher education contexts. Paper presented at the International Conference on Teacher Research, Vancouver, BC.
28. Hubball, H. T., & Albon, S. (in press). Developing a faculty learning community: Enhancing the scholarship of teaching at the University of British Columbia. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching.
29. Hubball, H. T., & Burt, H. (1999). Development of a faculty certificate program on teaching in higher education: The art, science and politics of implementation. Available at http://www.tag.ubc.ca/facdev/cert/.
30. Hubball, H. T., Clarke, A., & Beach, A. (2004). Assessing faculty learning communities. In M. Cox & L. Richlin (Eds.). Building faculty learning communities, (pp. 127-186). New directions for teaching and learning, Vol. 91. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31. Hubball, H. T., & Levy, A. (2004). Graduate course design in health care and epidemiology: A learning-centred approach. Journal for Faculty Development, 20(1), 11-19.
32. Hubball, H. T., & Poole, G. (2004). Learning-centred education to meet the diverse needs and circumstances of university faculty through an eight-month programme on teaching and learning in higher education. International Journal for Academic Development, 8(2), 11-24.
33. Hudspith, B., & Jenkins, H. (2001). Teaching the Art of Inquiry. Halifax, NS: Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.
34. Keesen, F., Wubbels, T., Van Tartwijk, J., & Bouhuijs, P. A. J. (1996). Preparing university teachers in The Netherlands: Issues and trends. The International Journal for Academic Development, 1(2), 8-16.
35. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
36. Kreber, C. (2001). Conceptualizing the scholarship of teaching and identifying unresolved issues: The framework for this volume. In C. Kreber (Ed.), Scholarship revisited: Perspectives on the scholarship of teaching, (pp. 1-18). New directions for teaching and learning, Vol. 86. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
37. Kreber, C., & Brook, P. (2001). Impact evaluation of educational development programs. International Journal for Academic Development, 6(2), 96-108.
38. Kreber, C., & Cranton, P. (2000). Exploring the scholarship of teaching. The Journal of Higher Education, 71, 476-495.
39. Lawler, P. A., & King, K. P. (2000). Planning for effective faculty development: Using adult learning strategies. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
40. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
41. Lockhart, M., & Borland, K. W. (2001). Critical thinking goals, outcomes, and pedagogy in senior capstone courses. The Journal of Faculty Development, 18(1), 19-25.
42. McKeachie, W. J. (1997). Critical elements in training university teachers. The International Journal for Academic Development, 2(1), 67-74.
43. McKinney, K. (2004). The scholarship of teaching and learning: Past lessons, current challenges, and future visions. In C. Wehlburg & S. Chadwick-Blossey (Eds.), To improve the academy, resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development, 22 (pp. 3-19). Bolton, MA: Anker.
44. Merriam, S. B. (2001). Introduction: The new update on adult learning theory. In S. B. Merriam (Ed.): The new update on adult learning theory, Vol. 89: New directions for adult and, continuing education (pp. 1-3). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
45. Mierson, S., & Parikh, A. A. (2000). Stories from the field: problem-based learning from a teacher's and student's perspective. Change, 32(1), 21-27.
46. Mills, G. E. (2000). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
47. Murphy, S. E. (1997). Eight components of program implementation. Performance Improvement, 36(1), 6-8.
48. Ottoson, J. M., & Green, L. W. (1987). Reconciling concept and context: Theory of implementation. Advances in Health Education and Promotion, 2, 353-382.
49. Owen, J., Fletcher, C., & Richards, K. (2001). Evaluating a school-based experiential personal development course. Horizons, 16, 27-31.
50. Peterat, L., & Smith, M. G. (2001). In-forming practice through classroom inquiry. In L. Peterat & M. G. Smith (Eds.), In-forming practice through action research, Yearbook 21 (pp. 2-29). Peoria, IL: American Association for Family and Consumer Sciences and Glencoe/McGraw-Hill.
51. Pratt, D. D., & Collins, J. B. (2000). The Teaching Perspectives Inventory. Proceedings of the 41st Adult Education Research Conference. Vancouver, BC, Canada.
52. Priest, S. (2001). A program evaluation primer. Journal of Experiential Education, 24(1), 34-40.
53. Race, P. (1998). The art of assessing, part 2. New Academic, 5(1), 5-7.
54. Ramsden, P. (1994). Learning to teach in higher education. London, England: Routledge Publishing.
55. Richlin, L. (2001). Scholarly teaching and the scholarship of teaching. Identifying and implementing the scholarship of teaching. In C. Kreber (Ed.), Scholarship Revisited: Perspectives on the Scholarship of Teaching, Vol. 86: New directions for teaching and learning (pp. 57-68). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
56. Richlin, L., & Cox, M. (2004). Developing scholarly teaching and the scholarship of teaching and learning through faculty learning communities. In M. Cox & L. Richlin (Eds.), Building faculty learning communities, (pp. 127-136). New directions for teaching and learning, Vol. 97. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
57. Robertson, S., & Hubball, H. T. (2005). Coach-to-coach mentoring: Raising the bar. Strategies, Journal for Physical and Sport Educators, 18(5), 6-10.
58. Rust, C. (1998). The impact of educational development workshops on teachers' practice. The International Journal for Academic Development, 3(1), 72-80.
59. Sander, N., & Halas, J. (2003). Action research as responsible practice: Parental responses to assessment, evaluation, and reporting practices in physical education. Physical and Health Education Journal, Summer, 12-17.
60. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Towards a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
61. SEDA Program Accreditation Scheme (1996). The Accreditation of Teachers in Higher Education. Oxford, England: Oxford Staff and Educational Development Association.
62. Seijts, G., Taylor, L., & Latham, G. (1998). Enhancing teaching performance through goal setting, implementation and seeking feedback. International Journal for Academic Development, 3(2), 156-167.
63. Smith, R. A. (1997). Making teaching count in Canadian higher education: Developing a national agenda. Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21, 1-10.
64. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65. Thompson, S. (1996). How action research can put teachers and parents on the same team. Educational Horizons, 74(2), 70-76.
66. Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
67. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
68. Weston, C. B., & McAlpine, L. (2001). Making explicit the development toward the scholarship of teaching. In C. Kreber (Ed.), Scholarship revisited: Perspectives on the scholarship of teaching, (pp. 89-97). New directions for teaching and learning, Vol. 86, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
69. Winter, R. (1996). Some principles and procedures for the conduct of action research. In O. Zuber-Skerritt (Ed.), New directions in action research (pp. 38-61). London, England: Falmer Press.