Optimizing Teaching and Learning: Practicing Pedagogical Research

Optimizing Teaching and Learning: Practicing Pedagogical Research

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-232

  Gurung, Regan A R ^a   Schwartz, Beth M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84889432967     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781444305883     Document Type: Book

References (230)

1. Al-Hilawani, Y. A., & Sartawi, A. A. (1997). Study skills and habits of female university students. College Student Journal, 31, 537-544.
2. Almer, E. D., Jones, K., & Moeckel, C. (1998). The impact of one minute papers on learning in an introductory accounting course. Issues in Accounting Education, 13, 485-497.
3. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl (Eds.) (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and Assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
4. Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Arreola, R. A. (1995). Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system: A handbook for college faculty and administrators on designing and operating a comprehensive faculty evaluation system. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Co.
6. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
7. Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Balch, W. R. (1998). Practice versus review exams and final exam performance. Teaching of Psychology, 25, 181-185.
9. Balch, W. R. (2001). Study tips: How helpful do introductory psychology students find them?. Teaching of Psychology, 28, 272-274.
10. Banta, T. W., Lund, J. P., Black, K. E., & Oblander, F. W. (1996). Assessment in practice: Putting principles to work in college campuses. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Becker, W. E., & Andrews, M. L. (Eds.) (2004). The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: Contributions of research universities. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
13. Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
14. Berardi-Coletta, B., Buyer, L. S., Dominowski, R. L., & Rellinger, E. A. (1995). Metacognition and problem solving: A process-oriented approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, Cognition, 21, 205-223.
15. Berk, R. A. (2006). Thirteen strategies to measure college teaching. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
16. Berliner, D. C. (2006) Educational psychology: Search for essence throughout a century of influence. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 3-28. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Bernstein, D., Burnett, A., Goodburn, A., & Savory, P. (2006). Making teaching and learning visible: Course portfolios and the peer review of teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Bligh, D. A. (2000). What's the use of lectures? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19. Bloom, B. S., Englehard, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.
20. Bloom, H. S., & Lipsey, M. W. (2004). Some food for thought about effect size. Retrieved on January 19th, 2008 from http://www.wtgrantfoundation.org/usr_doc/FoodforThought.pdf.
21. Bol, L., Warkentin, R. W., Nunnery, J. A., & O'Connell, A. A. (1999). College students' study activities and their relationship to study context, reference course, and achievement. College Student Journal, 33, 608-622.
22. Borkowski, J. G., Carr, M., Rellinger, E., & Pressley, M. (1990) Self-regulated cognition: Interdependence of metacognition, attributions, and self-esteem. In B. F. Jones & J. T. Guthrie (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 53-92. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Borkowski, J. G., & Muthukrishna, N. (1992) Moving metacognition into the classroom: "Working models" and effective strategy teaching. In M. Pressley, K. R. Harris, & J. T. Guthrie (Eds.), Promoting academic competence and literacy in school (pp. 477-501. San Diego, CA: Academic.
24. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.) (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Research Council, Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning, National Academy Press.
26. Braskamp, L. A., & Ory, J. C. (1994). Assessing faculty work: Enhancing individual and institutional performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27. Braxton, J., Luckey, W., & Holland, P. (2002). Institutionalizing a broader view of scholarship through Boyer's four domains. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 29(2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28. Brewer, C. (2004). Near real-time assessment of student learning and understanding in biology courses. BioScience, 54(11), 1034-1039.
29. Brezis, M., & Cohen, R. (2004). Interactive learning in medicine: Socrates in electronic clothes. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 97, 47-51.
30. Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 77-165). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1977). Training strategic study time apportionment in educable retarded children. Intelligence, 1, 94-107.
32. Brown, W. F., & Holtzman, W. H. (1955). A study-attitudes questionnaire for predicting academic success. Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 75-84.
33. Buskist, W. (2004). Ways of the master teacher. APS Observer, 17(9), 23-26.
34. Buskist, W., & Davis, S. F. (Eds.) (2006). Handbook of the teaching of psychology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
35. Buskist, W., & Keeley, J. (2005). The Teacher Behaviors Checklist (TBC): A psychometrically sound and practical and teaching evaluation instrument. Paper presentation at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.
36. Buskist, W., Sikorski, J., Buckley, T., & Saville, B. K. (2002) Elements of master teaching. In S. F. Davis & W. Buskist (Eds.), The teaching of psychology: Essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie and Charles L. Brewer (pp. 27-39. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Cambridge, B. L.(Ed.) (2004). Campus progress: Supporting the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
38. Cano, F. (2006). An in-depth analysis of the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 6, 1023-1038.
39. Carini, R., Kuh, G., & Klein, S. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47, 1-32.
40. Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (1998). Do mnemonic memories fade as time goes by? Here's looking anew! Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 276-297.
41. Carrell, L. J., & Menzel, K. E. (1997). The impact of preparation and motivation on learning performance. Communication Education, 46, 262-272.
42. Cavanaugh, J. C., & Borkowski, J. G. (1979). The metamemory-memory "connection": Effects of strategy training and maintenance. The Journal of General Psychology, 101, 161-174.
43. Cavanaugh, J. C., & Perlmutter, M. (1982). Metamemory: A critical examination. Child Development, 53, 11-28.
44. Chapman, K. J., Meuter, M. L., Toy, D., & Wright, L. (2006). Can't we pick our own groups? The influence of group selection method on group dynamics and outcomes. Journal of Management Education, 30(4), 557-569.
45. Chen, Z., & Daehler, M. W. (2000). External and internal instantiation of abstract information facilitates transfer in insight problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 423-449.
46. Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting selfexplanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
47. Chick, N. L., Hassell, H., & Haynie, A. (2007) Reading for complexity: Recognizing and valuing ambiguity in literature. Retrieved on January 28th, 2008 from http://www.cfkeep.org/html/snapshot.php?id=93751660356067.
48. Chism, N. V. N. (1999). Peer review of teaching. Bolton, MA: Anker.
49. Chizmar, J. F., & Ostrosky, A. L. (1998). The one-minute paper: Some empirical findings. Journal of Economic Education, 29, 3-10.
50. Ciccone, T., & Myers, R. (February, 2006). Report on the impact of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning on the UW-System. Presentation at the International Society for the Teaching & Learning (ISSOTL) Conference, Washington, DC.
51. Claxton, C. S., & Murrell, P. H. (1987), Learning Styles: Implications for Improving Educational Practices. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4, Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
52. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
53. Cohen, K. (2006, March). Instruction in the protection of human research subjects. Presentation at a one-day training workshop, Madison, WI.
54. Cox, M. (2001) Faculty learning communities: Change agents for transforming institutions into learning organizations. In D. Lieberman & C. Wehlburg (Eds.), To improve the academy, 19 (pp. 69-93. Bolton, MA: Anker.
55. Cox, M. (2004). An introduction to faculty learning communities: Utilizing FLCs to solve problems and seize opportunities. In M. D. Cox & L. Richlin (Eds.) New directions for teaching and learning, 97. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
56. Daniel, D. B. (2005) How to ruin a perfectly good lecture: Presentation software as a teaching tool. In B. Perlman, L. I. McCann, & W. Buskist (Eds.), Voices of experience: Memorable talks from the National Institute on the Teaching of Psychology (pp. 119-139. Washington, DC: American Psychological Society.
57. Davis, B. G. (1993). Tools for teaching. Indianapolis: Jossey-Bass.
58. Davis, S. F., & Buskist, W. (2006) What teachers need to know about teaching and learning. In W. Buskist & S. F. Davis (Eds.), The handbook of the teaching of psychology (pp. 3-10. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
59. DeBord, K. A., Aruguete, M. S., & Muhlig, J. (2004). Are computer-assisted teaching methods effective? Teaching of Psychology, 31, 65-68.
60. Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: D. C. Heath.
61. Diamond, R. M. (1998). Aligning faculty rewards with institutional mission: Statements, policies, and guidelines. Bolton, MA: Anker.
62. Diamond, R., & Adam, B. (2000). The disciplines speak II: More statements on rewarding the scholarly, professional, & creative work of faculty. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
63. Dickinson, D. J, & O'Connell, D. Q. (1990). Effect of quality & quantity of study on student grades. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 227-231.
64. Dorner, D. (1979). Self reflection and problem solving. In F. Klix (Ed.), Human and artificial intelligence (pp. 101-107). Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenshaften.
65. Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. R. (2007). Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 228-232.
66. Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T. O. (1997). Similarity between the cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the cue for test is not the primary determinant of JOL accuracy. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 34-49.
67. Edgerton, R. (2005). Foreword. In K. O'Meara & R. E. Rice (Eds.), Faculty priorities reconsidered: Rewarding multiple forms of scholarship (pp. xi-xvi). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
68. Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A., & Gable, S. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 549-563.
69. Entwhistle, N., & Tomlinson, P. (Eds.) (2007). Student learning and university teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, Monograph Series II.
70. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
71. Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
72. Fink, L. D. (Ed.) (1984). New direction for teaching and learning: No. 17. In The first year of college teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
73. Fink, L. D. (1995). Evaluting your own teaching. In P. Seldin (Ed.). Improving college teaching. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Co.
74. Fink, L. D. (2003). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
75. Fischer, K. W., Daniel, D. W., Immordino-Yang, M. H., Stern, E., Battro, A., & Koizumi, H. (2007). Why Mind, Brain, and Education? Why now? Mind, Brain, and Education, 1, 1-2.
76. Fisher, R. P., & Craik, F. I. M. (1977). The interaction between encoding and retrieval operations in cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 701-711.
77. Flavell, J. H. (1971). First discussant's comments: What is memory development the development of? Human Development, 14, 72-278.
78. Flavell, J. H. (1977). Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
79. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
80. Fleming, V. M. (2002). Improving students' exam performance by introducing study strategies and goal setting. Teaching of Psychology, 29, 115-119.
81. Fletcher, J. D. (2003) Evidence for learning from technology-assisted instruction. In H. F. O'Neil, Jr. & R. S. Perez (Eds.), Technology applications in education: A learning view (pp. 79-99. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
82. Flora, S. R., & Logan, R. E. (1996). Using computerized study guides to increase performance on general psychology examinations: An experimental analysis. Psychological Reports, 79, 235-241.
83. Foos, P. W., Mora, J. J., & Tkacz, S. (1994). Student study techniques and the generation effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 567-576.
84. Gettinger, M., & Seibert, J. K. (2002). Contributions of study skills to academic competence. School Psychology Review, 31, 350-365.
85. Gillespie, K. H. (2002). A guide to faculty development: Practice advice, examples, and resources. Bolton, MA: Anker.
86. Gilligan, C. (1982) In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
87. Gillstrom, A., & Ronnberg, J. (1995). Comprehension calibration and recall prediction accuracy of texts: Reading skill, reading strategies, and effort. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 545-558.
88. Glassick, C. E., Huber., M. T., & Maeroff, G. I. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
89. Glenberg, A. M., & Epstein, W. (1985). Calibration of comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 545-558.
90. Glenberg, A. M., Sanocki, T., Epstein, W., & Morris, C. (1987). Enhancing calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 119-136.
91. Grasha, A. F. (1996). Teaching with style: A practical guide to enhancing learning by understanding teaching and learning styles. Pittsburgh, PA: Alliance.
92. Grasha, T. (1990) The naturalistic approach to learning styles. College Teaching, 38(3), 106-113.
93. Gray, P., Froh, R., & Diamond, R. (1992). A national study of research universities: On the balance between research and undergraduate teaching. New York: Syracuse University Center for Instructional Development.
94. Greenwald, A. G., & Gillmore, G. (1997) Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings, American Psychologist, 52, 1209-1217.
95. Greimel-Fuhrmann, B., & Geyer, A. (2003). Students' evaluation of teachers and instructional quality-Analysis of relevant factors based on empirical evaluation research. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(3), 229-238.
96. Gurung, R. A. R. (2003). Pedagogical aids and student performance. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 92-95.
97. Gurung, R. A. R. (2004). Pedagogical aids: Learning enhancers or dangerous detours? Teaching of Psychology, 31, 164-166.
98. Gurung, R. A. R. (2005a). How do students really study (and does it matter)? Teaching of Psychology, 32, 238-240.
99. Gurung, R. A. R. (2005b). In-class learning assessment strategies. In W. Buskist & S. F. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of the teaching of psychology (pp. 285-289). Boston: Blackwell.
100. Gurung, R. A. R., Haynie, A., & Chick, N. (Eds.) (in press). Signature pedagogies across the disciplines. Arlington, VA: Stylus.
101. Gurung, R. A. R., & Daniel, D. (2005). Evidence-based pedagogy: Do pedagogical features enhance student learning? In D. Dunn & S. L. Chew (Eds.), Best practices for teaching introductory psychology (pp. 41-56). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
102. Gurung, R. A. R., & Martin, R. (2007). Predicting textbook reading: The textbook assessment and usage scale. Manuscript under review.
103. Gurung, R. A. R., Martin, R., Jarvis, P., & Creasey, G. (2007, August). Code of conduct: Internationalizing the ethics of SoTL. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Sydney, Australia.
104. Gurung, R. A. R., & Vespia, K. M. (2007). Looking good, teaching well? Linking liking, looks, and learning. Teaching of Psychology, 34, 5-10.
105. Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (1998). Metacognition in educational theory and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
106. Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (1996). Study strategies have meager support: A review with recommendations for implementation. The Journal of Higher Education, 67, 692-715.
107. Harrison, G., Andrews, J., & Saklofske, D. (2003). Current perspectives on cognitive learning styles. Education Canada, 43, 44-47.
108. Hart, J. T. (1965). Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 208-216.
109. Harvey, V. S. (1995). Teaching study skills. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (3rd ed., pp. 931-942). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
110. Hatch, T. (2006). Into the classroom: Developing the scholarship of teaching and learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
111. Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99-136.
112. Hines, L. (2005). Interactive learning environment keeps Modesto students engaged. T H E Journal, 33(2), 40-41.
113. Hood, A. B. (Ed.) (1986). The Iowa Student Development Inventories. Iowa City: Hitech Press.
114. Huba, M. E., & Freed, J. E. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses. Allyn & Bacon.
115. Huber, M. T. (2001). Disciplinary styles in the scholarship of teaching: Reflections on the Carnegie Academy for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
116. Huber, M. T., & Hutchings, P. (2005). The advancement of learning: Building the teaching commons. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
117. Huber, M. T., & Morreale, S. P. (Eds.) (2002). Disciplinary styles in the scholarship of teaching and learning: Exploring common ground. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education and the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
118. Hutchings, P. (2000) Approaching the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. In P. Hutchings (Ed.) (2000). Opening lines: Approaches to the scholarship of teaching and learning (pp. 1-10). Menlo Park, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
119. Hutchings, P. (2002) Ethics and aspiration in the scholarship of teaching and learning. In P. Hutchings (Ed.) Ethics of Inquiry: Issues in scholarship of teaching and learning (pp. 1-18. Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Publications.
120. Hutchings, P. (2007) Theory: The elephant in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning room. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 1-4.
121. Hutchings, P., & Shulman, L. S. (1999). The scholarship of teaching: New elaborations, new developments. Change, 31(5), 10-15.
122. James, W. (1899/2006). Talks to teachers on psychology and to students on some of life's ideals. New York: Elibron Classics.
123. Jones, C. H., & Slate, J. R. (1992), "Technical manual for the study habits inventory" (unpublished manuscript), Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, AR.
124. Jones, T. A., & Schallert, T. (1994). Use-dependent growth of pyramidal neurons after neocortex damage. Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 2140-2152.
125. Keeley, J., Smith, D., & Buskist, W. (2006). The Teacher Behaviors Checklist: Factor analysis of its utility for evaluating teaching. Teaching of Psychology, 33, 84-90.
126. Kemmis, S., & McTaggert, R., (1990). The Action Research Planner. Melbourne, Australia: Deakin University Press.
127. Kennedy, E. J., Lawton, L., & Plumlee, E. L. (2002). Blissful ignorance: The problem of unrecognized incompetence and academic performance. Journal of Marketing Education, 24(3), 243-252.
128. Kiewra, K. A., DuBois, N. F., Christian, D., & McShane A. (1988). Providing study notes: Comparison of three types of notes for review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 595-597.
129. King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgement: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
130. Kinzie, J. (2007). Measuring and managing student engagement: Why it matters in the first year of college. Madison, WI: Opid Spring Conference.
131. Kitsantas, A. (2002). Test preparation and performance: A self-regulatory analysis. Journal of Experimental Education, 70, 101-113.
132. Klass, G., & Crothers, L. (2000). An experimental evaluation of web-based tutorial quizzes. Social Sciences Computer Review, 18, 508-515.
133. Kluwe, R. H. (1982). Cognitive knowledge and executive control: Metacognition. In D. R. Griffin (Ed.), Animal mind-human mind (pp. 201-224). New York: Springer-Verlag.
134. Kobayashi, K. (2006). Combined effects of note-taking/-reviewing on learning and the enhancement through interventions: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology, 26, 459-477.
135. Kolb, B. (1995). Brain Plasticity and Behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
136. Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2005). Illusions of competence in monitoring one's knowledge during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 187-194.
137. Kratzig, G. P., & Arbuthnott, K. D. (2006). Perceptual learning style and learning proficiency: A test of the hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 238-246.
138. Kuh, G. D. (2004) The contributions of the research university to assessment and innovation in undergraduate education. In W. E. Becker & M. L. Andrews (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: The contributions of research universities (pp. 52-59. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
139. Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J., Whitt, J., & Associates. (2005). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
140. Kuhn, D. J. (1988). An assessment of the study habits and skills of students in postsecondary science courses. Community/Junior College Quarterly of Research and Practice, 12, 197-204.
141. Lewis, K. G. (2001). Techniques and strategies for interpreting student evaluations: New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 87. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.
142. Lewis, S., Carter, K., & Patrick, H. (2004). Why do self-assessment? In B. L. Cambridge (Ed.). Campus progress: Supporting the scholarship of teaching and learning (pp. 32-43). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
143. Locke, N. M. (1940). The student skills inventory: A study habits test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 24, 493-504.
144. Lodico, M. G., Ghatala, E. S., Levin, J. R., Pressley, M., & Bell, J. A. (1983). The effects of strategy monitoring training on children's selection of effective memory strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35, 73-277.
145. Lynch, D. (2006). Motivational factors, learning strategies and resource management as predictors of course grades. College Student Journal, 40, 423-428.
146. Maclean, M. S., & Mohr, M. M. (1999). Teacher-Researchers at Work. Berkeley, CA: National Writing Project.
147. Magliano, J. P., Little, L. D., & Graesser, A. C. (1993). The impact comprehension instruction on the calibration of comprehension. Reading Research and Instruction, 32, 49-63.
148. Magolda, M. B. B. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender-related patterns in students' intellectual development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
149. Maki, P. L. (2004). Assessing for learning: Building a sustainable commitment across the institution. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
150. Maki, R. H. (1995). Accuracy of metacomprehension judgments for questions of varying importance levels. American Journal of Psychology, 108, 327-344.
151. Maki, R. H. (in press). Predicting performance on text material: Delayed versus immediate predictions and test. Memory and Cognition.
152. Maki, R. H., & Berry, S. (1984). Metacomprehension of text material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 663-679.
153. Maki, R. H., & Serra, M. (1992a). The basis of test predictions for text material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 116-126.
154. Maki, R. H., & Serra, M. (1992b). Role of practice test in the accuracy of test predictions on text material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 200-210.
155. Marsh, H. W., and Roche, L. A. (2000). Effects of grading leniency and low workload on students' evaluations of teaching: Popular myth, bias, validity or innocent bystander? The Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 202-228.
156. Masters, J. (1995). The history of action research. In I. Hughes (Ed.), Action Research Electronic Reader. The University of Sydney, online. Retrieved March 15th, 2007 from www.behs.cchs.usyd.edu.au/arow/Reader/rmasters.htm.
157. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
158. Meyers, R. (2007). Guidelines for human research participants in scholarship of teaching and learning research. University of Wisconsin System Leadership Site for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Retrieved February 9th, 2008 from http://www4.uwm.edu//leadershipsite/index.cfm.
159. McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2005). Material appropriate difficulty: A framework for determining when difficulty is desirable for improving learning. In A. F. Healy (Ed.), Experimental cognitive psychology and its applications. Decade of behavior. (pp. 73-85). Washington, DC: US: American Psychological Association.
160. McKeachie, W. J. (1997). Student ratings: The validity of use: American Psychologist, 52, 1218-1225.
161. McKernan, J. (1991). Curriculum action research: A handbook of methods and resources for the reflective practitioner. London: Kogan Page.
162. McKinney, K. (2007). Enhancing learning through the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: The challenges and joys of juggling. Bolton, MA: Anker.
163. Menges, R. J., Weimer, M., & Associates. (1996). Teaching on solid ground: Using scholarship to improve practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
164. Metcalfe, J. (2006). Principles of cognitive science in education APS Observer, 19.
165. Metcalfe, J., & Greene, M. J. (2007). Metacognition of agency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 184-199.
166. Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371-378.
167. Mills, G. E. (2007). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
168. Mohamed, A. A. (1997). Differences among low-, average-, and high-achieving college students on learning and study strategies. Educational Psychology, 17, 171-177.
169. Motes, M. A., & Wiegmann, D. A. (1999). Computerized cognition laboratory. Teaching of Psychology, 26, 62-65.
170. Murrell, P. A., & Claxton, C. S. (1987). Experiential learning theory as a guide for effective teaching. Counselor Education and Supervision, 27, 4-14.
171. National Research Council (2001). Knowing what student know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
172. Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). The delayed-JOL effect: When delaying your judgments of learning can improve the accuracy of your metacognition monitoring. Psychological Science, 2, 267-270.
173. Nesbit, J. C., Winne, P. H., Jamieson-Noel, D., Code, J., Zhou, M., MacAllister, K., Bratt, S., Wang, W., & Hadwin, A. (2006). Using cognitive tools in gStudy to investigate how study activities covary with achievement goals. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 339-358.
174. Neville, H. J. (1995). Effects of experience on the development of the visual systems of the brain on the language systems of the brain. Paper presented in the series Brain Mechanisms Underlying School Subjects, University of Oregon, Eugene.
175. Nist, S. L., Simpson, M. L., Olejnik, S., & Mealey, D. L. (1991). The relation between self-selected study processes and test performance. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 849-874.
176. Noppe, I. (2007). PowerPoint presentation handouts and college student learning outcomes. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1. Retrieved March 20th, 2007 from http://www.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl.
177. Olivares, O. J. (2002). An analysis of the study time-grade association. Radical Pedagogy, 4, np. Retrieved on June 24th from http://radicalpedagogy.icaap.org/content/issue4_1/06_Olivares.html.
178. O'Meara, K, & Rice, R. E., (2005). Faculty priorities reconsidered: Rewarding multiple forms of scholarship. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
179. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Slate, J. R., & Schwartz, R. A. (2001). Role of study skills in graduate-level educational research courses. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 238-246.
180. Palmer, P. J. (1998). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher's life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
181. Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990) How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15-51. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
182. Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
183. Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
184. Plant, E. A., Ericsson, K. A., Hill, L., & Asberg, K. (2005). Why study time does not predict grade point average across college students: Implications of deliberate practice for academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 96-116.
185. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal Protocols of Reading: The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
186. Pressley, M., Yokoi, L., van Meter, P., Van Etten, S., & Freebern, G. (1997). Some of the reasons why preparing for exams is so hard? What can be done to make it easier? Educational Psychology Review, 9, 1-38.
187. Prince, J. S., Miller, T. K., & Winston, J. B., Jr. (1974). Student Development Task Inventory. Athens, GA: Student Development Associates.
188. Proctor, B. E., Hurst, A., Prevatt, F., Petscher, Y., & Adams, K. (2006). Study skills profiles of normal-achieving and academically-struggling college students. Journal of College Student Development, 47, 37-51.
189. Rice, R. E. (2005) "Scholarship Reconsidered": History and context. In K. O'Meara & R. E. Rice (Eds.) Faculty priorities reconsidered: Rewarding multiple forms of scholarship (pp. 17-31. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
190. Richlin, L. (2001). Scholarly teaching and the scholarship of teaching. In C. Kreber (Ed.), Scholarship revisited: Perspectives on the scholarship of teaching (pp. 57-68). New Directions for Teaching and Learning. No. 86. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
191. Richlin, L. (2006). Blueprint for learning: Constructing college courses to facilitate, assess, and document learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
192. Rinaldi, C., & Gurung, R. A. R. (2005). Does matching teaching and learning styles optimize learning? Teaching Forum, np. Retrieved March 27th, 2007 from www.uwosh. edu/programs/teachingforum/public_html/?module= displaystory&story_id=648&format=html.
193. Robbins, S., Carlstrom, A., Davis, D., Langley, R., Lauver, K., & Le, H. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130(2), 261-268.
194. Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249-255.
195. Rohrer, D. & Pashler, H. (2007). Increasing retention without increasing study time. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 4, 183-186.
196. Savory, P., Burnett, A. N., & Goodburn, A. (2007). Inquiry into the college classroom: A journey toward scholarly teaching. Bolton, MA: Anker.
197. Schneider, W. (1985). Developmental trends in the metamemory-memory behavior relationship: An integrative review. In D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. MacKinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 57-109). New York: Academic.
198. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What's all the fuss about metacognition? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 189-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
199. Schwartz, B., & Reisberg, D. Learning and memory. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
200. Seldin, P. (2004). A practical guide to improved performance and promotion/tenure decisions (3rd ed.). Bolton, MA: Anker.
201. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
202. Shulman, L. S. (2002). Ethics of Inquiry: Issues in scholarship of teaching and learning. Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Publications.
203. Shulman, L. S., & Hutchings, P. (September/October, 1999). The Scholarship of Teaching: New elaborations, new developments, Change Magazine, 10-15.
204. Snooks, M. K., Neeley, S. E., & Williamson, K. M. (2004) From SGID and GIFT to BBQ: Streamlining midterm student evaluations to improve teaching and learning. In C. M. Wehlburg & S. Chadwick-Bossey (Eds.), To improve the academy (pp. 109-113. Bolton, MA: Anker.
205. Sorcinelli, M. D. (2002) Ten principles of good practice in creating and sustaining teaching and learning centers. In K. H. Gillespie (Ed.). A guide to faculty development: Practice advice, examples, and resources (pp. 2-9. Bolton, MA: Anker.
206. Stanley, B., Slate, J. R., & Jones, C. H. (1999). Study behaviors of college preparatory and honors students in the ninth grade. High School Journal, 82, 165-71.
207. Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann Education.
208. Stevens, D. D., & Levi, A. J. (2005). Introduction to rubrics: An assessment tool to save grading time, convey effective feeback and promote student learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
209. Strage, A., Baba, Y., Millner, S., Scharberg, M., Walker, E., Williamson, R., & Yoder, M. (2002). What every student affairs professional should know: Student study activities and beliefs associated with academic success. Journal of College Student Development, 43, 246-266.
210. Thompson, S. B., Nelson, C. E., & Naremore, R. C. (2001) Online SoTL Tutorial. Retrieved January 25th, 2008 from www.fctl.ucf.edu/ResearchAndScholarship/SoTL/whatIsSOTL/content/SoTL-Tutorial.pps.
211. Tversky, A. (1973). Encoding processes in recognition and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 275-287.
212. Tweed, R. G., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Learning considered within a cultural context: Confucian and Socratic approaches. American Psychologist, 57, 89-99.
213. Vasquez, K. (in press). Learning styles as self-fulfilling prophecies. In R. A. R. Gurung & L. Prieto (Eds.), Getting culture: Incorporating diversity across the curriculum. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
214. Walvoord, B. E. (2004). Assessment clear and simple: A practical guide for institutions, departments, and general education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
215. Walvoord, B. E. (2004) What it really takes. In B. Cambridge (Ed.). Campus progress: Supporting the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (pp. 78-87. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
216. Walvoord, B. E., Anderson, V. J., Breihan, J. R., McCarthy, L. P., Robison, S. M., & Sherman, A. K. (1996) Making traditional graded tests and assignments serve contemporary needs for assessment. In T. W. Banta, J. P. Lund, K. E. Black, & F. W. Oblander (Eds.). Assessment in practice: Putting principles to work on college campuses (pp. 278-280. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
217. Washington, H. A. (2007). Medical apartheid: The dark history of medical experimentation on Black Americans from colonial times to the present. New York: Random House.
218. Watson, R. I. (1961). A brief history of educational psychology. The Psychological Record, 11, 209-242.
219. Weaver, C. A. III, & Bryant, D. S. (1995). Monitoring of comprehension: The role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text. Memory and Cognition, 23, 12-22.
220. Weimer, M. (2006). Enhancing scholarly work on teaching and learning: Professional literature that makes a difference. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
221. Weinstein, C. E., & Palmer, D. R. (2002). Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI): User's manual (2nd ed.). Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing.
222. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design expanded (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and curriculum development.
223. Wingate, U. (2006). Doing away with "study skills." Teaching in Higher Education, 11, 457-469.
224. Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. (2002). Exploring students' calibration of selfreports about study tactics and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 551-572.
225. Wood, P. (1983). Inquiring systems and problem structure: Implications for cognitive development. Human Development, 26(5), 249-265.
226. Wrenn, C. G. (1933). Study-habits inventory. Oxford: Stanford University Press.
227. Wright, D. L. (2002) Program types and prototypes. In K. H. Gillespie (Ed.). A guide to faculty development: Practice advice, examples, and resources (pp. 24-34. Bolton, MA: Anker.
228. Wyatt, D., Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P. B., Stein, S., Evans, P., & Brown, R. (1993). Comprehension strategies, worth and credibility monitoring, and evaluations: Cold and hot cognition when experts read professional articles that are important to them. Learning and Individual Differences, 5, 49-72.
229. Zhao, C. M., & Kuh, G. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 115-138.
230. Zimbardo, P. G. (1973). On the ethics of intervention in human psychological research: With special reference to the Stanford prison experiment. Cognition, 2, 243-256.