Concurrent verbal reports in second language acquisition research

Annual Review of Applied Linguistics

Volumn 30, Issue , 2010, Pages 111-127

  Bowles, Melissa A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952866954     PISSN: 02671905     EISSN: 14716356     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1017/S0267190510000036     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Anderson, M. (1985). Some evidence on the effect of verbalization on process: A methodological note. Journal of Accounting Research, 23, 843-852.
2. Baumann, J. F., Jones, L. A., & Seifert Kessell, N. (1993). Using think alouds to enhance children's comprehension monitoring abilities. Reading Teacher, 47, 184-193.
3. Berg, H. P. (2002). Remediating cognitive perspective-taking in children with autism. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University Teachers College, New York.
4. Bernardi, L., Wdowczyk-Szulc, J., Valenti, C., Castoldi, S., Passino, C., Spadacini, G., et al. (2000). Effects of controlled breathing, mental activity, and mental stress with or without verbalization on heart rate variability. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 35, 1462-1469.
5. Biehal, G., & Chakravarti, D. (1989). The effects of concurrent verbalization on choice processing. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 84-96.
6. Bowles, M. (2008). Task type and reactivity of verbal reports in SLA: A first look at a task other than reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 359-387.
7. Bowles,M. (2010). The think-aloud controversy in language acquisition research. New York: Routledge.
8. Bowles, M., & Leow, R. P. (2005). Reactivity and type of verbal report in SLA research methodology: Expanding the scope of investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 415-440.
9. Box, J. A. (2002). Guided writing in the early childhood classroom. Reading Improvement, 39, 111-113.
10. Bozarth, J. (1970). Verbal protocol patterns of college dormitory counselors. Counselor Education and Supervision, 10, 23-29.
11. Breetvelt, I. (1994). Relations between writing processes and text quality: When and how? Cognition and Instruction, 12, 103-123.
12. Brinkman, J. A. (1993). Verbal protocol accuracy in fault diagnosis. Ergonomics, 36, 1381- 1397.
13. Carrell, P. L. (1989). Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. Modern Language Journal, 73, 121-134.
14. Chamot, A. U., & El Dinary, P. B. (1999). Children's learning strategies in language immersion classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 83, 319-338.
15. Chan, R. C., Hoosain, R., & Lee, T. M. (2002). Talking while performing a task: A better attentional performance in patients with closed head injury? Journal of Clinical Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 695-704.
16. Cohen, A. D. (1986). Mentalistic measures in reading strategy research: Some recent findings. English for Specific Purposes, 5, 131-145.
17. Cohen, A. D. (1987). Recent uses of mentalistic data in reading strategy research. Revista de Documentaçao de Estudos em Lingúistica Teorica e Aplicada, 3, 57-84.
18. Cohen, A. D., & Cavalcanti, M. C. (1987). Viewing feedback on compositions from the teacher's and the student's perspective. ESPecialist, 16, 13-28.
19. Cushman, D. (2002). From scribbles to stories. Instructor, 111, 32-33.
20. Davis, J., & Bistodeau, L. (1993). How do L1 and L2 reading differ? Evidence from think aloud protocols. Modern Language Journal, 77, 459-472.
21. Davis, J. H., Carey, M. H., Foxman, P. N., & Tarr, D. B. (1968). Verbalization, experimenter presence, and problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 299-302.
22. Earthman, E. A. (1992). Creating the virtual work: Readers' processes in understanding literary texts. Research in the Teaching of English, 26, 351-384.
23. Ellis, R. (2004). The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 54, 227-275.
24. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Folger, T. L. (2001). Readers' parallel text construction while talking and thinking about the reading process. Dissertation Abstracts International, 62 (4), 1329A. (UMI No. 3012966)
26. Fowler, L. P. (1997). Clinical reasoning strategies used during care planning. Clinical Nursing Research, 6, 349-361.
27. Fresch, M. J., Wheaton, A., & Zutell, J. B. (1998). Thinking aloud during spelling word sorts. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 47, 285-294.
28. Friedman, P., & Mulhern, S.T. (1976). Relationship of clinician feedback to child-initiated verbalization during language training. Journal of Communication Disorders, 9, 289-299.
29. Gagn'e, R. H., & Smith, E. C. (1962). A study of the effects of verbalization on problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 12-18.
30. Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Gordon, C. J. (1990). Modeling an expository text structure strategy in think alouds. Reading Horizons, 31, 149-167.
32. Greenwood, J., & King, M. (1995). Some surprising similarities in the clinical reasoning of expert and novice orthopaedic nurses: Report of a study using verbal protocols and protocol analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22, 907-913.
33. Herwig, A. (2003). Plurilingual lexical organisation: Evidence from lexical processing in L1-L2-L3-L4 translation. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), Cross linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psychological perspectives (pp. 115-137). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
34. Hosenfeld, C. (1976). Learning about learning: Discovering our students' strategies. Foreign Language Annals, 9, 117-129.
35. Hosenfeld, C. (1977). A preliminary investigation of the reading strategies of successful and nonsuccessful second language learners. System, 5, 110-123.
36. Hosenfeld, C. (1979). Cindy: A learner in today's foreign language classroom. In W. Borne (Ed.), The foreign language learner in today's classroom environment (pp. 53-75). Montpelier, VT: Northwest Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
37. Hosenfeld, C. (1984). Case studies of ninth grade readers. In J. C. Alderson&A.H. Urquhart (Eds.), Reading in a foreign language (pp. 231-249). London, UK: Longman.
38. Hu, G. (2002). Psychological constraints on the utility of metalinguistic knowledge in second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 347-386.
39. Hughes, J., & Parkes, S. (2003). Trends in the use of verbal protocol analysis in software engineering research. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22, 127-141.
40. Jourdenais, R. (2001). Cognition, instruction, and protocol analysis. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 354-375). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41. Karsenty, L. (2001). Adapting verbal protocol methods to investigate speech systems use. Applied Ergonomics, 32, 15-22.
42. Keck, C. M., Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy-Ventura, N., & Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2006). Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition: A quantitative metaanalysis. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 91-131). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
43. Kern, R. G. (1994). The role of mental translation in second language reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 441-461.
44. Kuusela, H., & Paul, P. (2000). A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal protocol analysis. The American Journal of Psychology, 113, 387-404.
45. Lass, U., Klettke, W., Luer, G., & Ruhlender, P. (1991). Does thinking aloud influence the structure of cognitive processes? In R. Schmid & D. Zambarbieri (Eds.), Oculomotor control and cognitive processes (pp. 385-396). New York: North-Holland.
46. Lee, S.-K., & Huang, H.-T. (2008). Visual input enhancement and grammar learning: A meta-analytic review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 307-331.
47. Leow, R. P. (1997). Attention, awareness, and foreign language behavior. Language Learning, 47, 467-505.
48. Leow, R. P. (1998a). The effects of amount and type of exposure on adult learners' L2 development in SLA. Modern Language Journal, 82, 49-68.
49. Leow, R. P. (1998b). Toward operationalizing the process of attention in SLA: Evidence for Tomlin and Villa's (1994) fine-grained analysis of attention. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 133-159.
50. Leow, R. P. (1999). The role of attention in second/foreign language classroom research: Methodological issues. In F. M.-G. J. Guti'errez-Rexach (Ed.), Advances in Hispanic Linguistics: Papers from the 2nd Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 60-71). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
51. Leow, R. P. (2000). A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior: Aware versus unaware learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 557-584.
52. Leow, R. P. (2001a). Attention, awareness, and foreign language behavior. Language Learning, 51(Suppl. 1), 113-155.
53. Leow, R. P. (2001b). Do learners notice enhanced forms while interacting with the L2? An online and offline study of the role of written input enhancement in L2 reading. Hispania, 84, 496-509.
54. Leow, R. P., & Morgan-Short, K. (2004). To think aloud or not to think aloud: The issue of reactivity in SLA research methodology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 35-57.
55. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 407-452). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
56. Masgoret, A. M., & Gardner, R. C. (2003). Attitude, motivation, and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates. Language Learning, 53, 123-163.
57. Mathews, R. C., Buss, R. R., Stanley, W. B., Blanchard-Fields, F., Cho, J. R., & Druhan, B. (1989). Role of implicit and explicit processes in learning from examples: A synergistic effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1083- 1100.
58. Midanik, L. T., & Hines, A. M. (1991). "Unstandard" ways of answering standard questions: Protocol analysis in alcohol survey research. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 27, 245- 252.
59. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
60. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
61. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (Eds.). (2006). Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
62. Payne, J. W., Braunstein, M. L., & Carroll, J. S. (1978). Exploring predecisional behavior: An alternative approach to decision research. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 17-44.
63. Piolat, A., & Olive, T. (2000). Comment ́etudier le co○ut e le d'eroulement de la r'edaction de textes? La m'ethode de la triple t○ache: Un bilan m'ethodologique [How can the process and cost of writing texts be studied? The triple task methodology]. L'Annee Psychologique, 100, 465-502.
64. Polio, C., & Chiu, S. C.-H. (2007, April). Reactivity, veridicality, and language choice in L2 writing concurrent verbal protocols. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics Conference, Costa Mesa, CA.
65. Polio, C., & Wang, J. (2005, October). Another look at the reactivity of concurrent verbal protocols in second language reading research. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, New York.
66. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
67. Pritchard, R. (1990). The effects of cultural schemata on reading processing strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 273-295.
68. Qi, D., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 277-303.
69. Rhenius, D., & Deffner, G. (1990). Evaluation of concurrent thinking aloud using eyetracking data. In M. E. Wiklund (Ed.), Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting (pp. 1265-1269). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
70. Robertson, B. (1995). Why think along? Using "think alouds" in the classroom. State of Reading, 2, 19-22.
71. Robinson, K. M. (2001). The validity of verbal reports in children's subtraction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 211-222.
72. Rosa, E., & Leow, R. P. (2004a). Awareness, different learning conditions, and L2 development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 269-292.
73. Rosa, E., & Leow, R. P. (2004b). Computerized task-based exposure, explicitness, type of feedback, and Spanish L2 development. Modern Language Journal, 88, 192-216.
74. Rosa, E., & O'Neill, M. (1999). Explicitness, intake, and the issue of awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 511-556.
75. Rosenthal, M. C. (1994). "The fugitive literature." In H. Cooper & L. Hedges (Eds.), Handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
76. Rossomondo, A. E. (2007). The role of lexical temporal indicators and text interaction format in the incidental acquisition of the Spanish future tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 39-66.
77. Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar: A meta-analysis of the research. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133-164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
78. Russo, J. E., Johnson, E. J., & Stephens, D. L. (1989). The validity of verbal protocols. Memory and Cognition, 17, 759-769.
79. Sachs, R., & Polio, C. (2007). Learners' uses of two types of written feedback on an L2 writing revision task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 67-100.
80. Sachs, R., & Suh, B. R. (2007). Textually enhanced recasts, learner awareness, and L2 outcomes in synchronous computer-mediated interaction. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 197-227). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
81. Sanz, C., Lin, H.-J., Lado, B., Bowden, H. W., & Stafford, C. A. (2009). Concurrent verbalizations, pedagogical conditions, and reactivity: Two CALL studies. Language Learning, 59, 33-71.
82. Scardamalia, M. (1984). Teachability of reflective processes in written composition. Cognitive Science: A multidisciplinary journal of artificial intelligence, 8, 173-190.
83. Stratman, J. F., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (1994). Reactivity in concurrent think-aloud protocols. In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Speaking about writing: Reflections on research methodology (pp. 89-112). London: Sage.
84. Walczyk, J., Marsiglia, C. S., Bryan, K. S., & Naquin, P. J. (2001). Overcoming inefficient reading skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 750-757.
85. Wilhelm, J. (2001). Getting kids into the reading game: You gotta know the rules. Voices from the Middle, 8, 25-36.
86. Witte, S. P., & Cherry, R. D. (1994). Think-aloud protocols, protocol analysis, and research design: An exploration of the influence of writing tasks on writing processes. In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Speaking about writing: Reflections on research methodology (pp. 20-54). London: Sage.
87. Woodfield, H. (2008). Problematising discourse completion tasks: Voices from verbal report. Evaluation and Research in Education, 21, 43-69.
88. Yamashita, J. (2002). Reading strategies in L1 and L2: Comparison of four groups of readers with different reading ability in L1 and L2. ITL, Review of Applied Linguistics, 135-136, 1-35.
89. Yoshida, M. (2008). Think-aloud protocols and type of reading task: The issue of reactivity in L2 reading research. InM. Bowles, R. Foote, S. Perpin'an, & R. Bhatt (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2007 Second Language Research Forum (pp. 199-209). Somerville,MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
90. Zellermayer, M., & Cohen, J. (1996). Varying paths for learning to revise. Instructional Science, 24, 177-195.