A systems-based approach to technology integration using mentoring and communities of practice

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 175-190

  Kopcha, Theodore J ^a  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Community of practice; Mentoring; Model of technology integration; Technology integration

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952071884     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: 15566501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-008-9095-4     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Abramovich, S. (2006). Early algebra with graphics software as a type II application of technology. Computers in the Schools, 22(3-4), 21-33. doi: 10. 1300/J025v22n03_03.
2. Adamy, P., & Heinecke, W. (2005). The influence of organizational culture on technology integration in teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 233-255.
3. Atkins, N. E., & Vasu, E. S. (2000). Measuring knowledge of technology usages and stages of concern about computing: A study of middle school teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 279-302.
4. Barron, A. E., Harmes, J. C., & Kamker, K. (2005). Authentic instruction in laptop classrooms: Sample lessons that integrate type II applications. Computers in the Schools, 22(3-4), 119-130. doi: 10. 1300/J025v22n03_10.
5. Bauer, J., & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward technology integration in the schools: Why it isn't happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 519-546.
6. Becker, H. J., & Ravitz, J. L. (2001). Computer use by teachers: Are cuban's predictions correct? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle.
7. Bradshaw, L. K. (2002). Technology for teaching and learning: Strategies for staff development and follow-up support. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(1), 131-150.
8. Brown, C. (2007). Learning through multimedia construction-A complex strategy. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16(2), 93-124.
9. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Deguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
10. Brzycki, D., & Dudt, K. (2005). Overcoming barriers to technology use in teacher preparation programs. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 619-641.
11. Bullock, D. (2004). Moving from theory to practice: An examination of the factors that preservice teachers encounter as they attempt to gain experience teaching with technology during field placement experiences. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(2), 211-237.
12. Chuang, H., Thompson, A., & Schmidt, D. (2003). Faculty technology mentoring programs: Major trends in the literature. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 19(4), 101-106.
13. Clark, K. (2006). Practices for the use of technology in high schools: A Delphi study. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 481-499.
14. Cole, K., Simkins, M., & Penuel, W. R. (2002). Learning to teach with technology: Strategies for inservice professional development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(3), 431-455.
15. Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school clasrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813-836. doi: 10. 3102/00028312038004813.
16. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2001). The Systematic design of instruction (5th ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc.
17. Donovan, L., Hartley, K., & Strudler, N. (2007). Teacher concerns during initial implementation of a one-to-one laptop initiative at the middle school level. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(3), 263-286.
18. Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction (pp. 1-16). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
19. Earle, R. S. (2002). The integration of instructional technology into public education: Promises and challenges. Educational Technology, 42(1), 5-13.
20. Easley, L., & Hoffman, S. (2000). Creating an electronic classroom: A practical guide. International Journal of Social Education, 15(1), 80-93.
21. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61. doi: 10. 1007/BF02299597.
22. Ertmer, P. A. (2001). Responsive instructional design: Scaffolding the adoption and change process. Educational Technology, 41(6), 33-38.
23. Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 41-56. doi: 10. 1007/BF02504683.
24. Feist, L. (2003). Removing barriers to professional development. T. H. E. Journal, 30(11), 30-36.
25. Finley, L., & Hartman, D. (2004). Institutional change and resistance: Teacher preparatory faculty and technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(3), 319-337.
26. Forcier, R. C., & Descy, D. E. (2008). The computer as an educational tool: Productivity and problem solving (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
27. Franklin, T., Turner, S., Kariuki, M., & Duran, M. (2001). Mentoring overcomes barriers to technology integration. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 18(1), 26-31.
28. Friedrichsen, P. M., Dana, T. M., Zembal-Saul, C., Munford, D., & Tsur, C. (2001). Learning to teach with technology model: Implementation in secondary science teacher education. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 20(4), 377-394.
29. Gallagher, S. (2000). Classroom-based technology training for inservice teachers. In C. Crawford, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education international conference, 2000 (pp. 633-635). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
30. Glazer, E., Hannafin, M. J., & Song, L. (2005). Promoting technology integration through collaborative apprenticeships. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 57-67. doi: 10. 1007/BF02504685.
31. Hayes, D. N. A. (2007). ICT and learning: Lessons from Australian classrooms. Computers and Education, 49, 385-395. doi: 10. 1016/j. compedu. 2005. 09. 003.
32. Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252. doi: 10. 1007/s11423-006-9022-5.
33. Hinson, J., LaPrairie, K., & Heroman, D. (2005). One size does not fit all: The technology integration model. THE Journal, Technology Horizons in K-12 Education, 32(11), 26-30.
34. Hinson, J., LaPrairie, K., & Heroman, D. (2006). A failed effort to overcome tech barriers in a K-12 setting: What went wrong and why. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 148-158.
35. Hu, P. J.-H., Clark, T. H. K., & Ma, W. W. (2007). Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: A longitudinal study. Information and Management, 41, 227-241. doi: 10. 1016/S0378-7206(03)00050-8.
36. Hughes, J. (2004). Technology learning principles for preservice and in-service teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(3), 345-362.
37. Hughes, J. (2005). The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences in forming technology-integrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 277-302.
38. Hughes, J. E., & Ooms, A. (2004). Content-focused technology inquiry groups: Preparing urban teachers to integrate technology to transform student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(4), 397-411.
39. Jonassen, D., Howland, J., Marra, R., & Crismond, D. (2008). Meaningful learning with technology (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
40. Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1995). Student achievement through staff development: Fundamentals of school renewal. New York: Longman.
41. Kanaya, T., Light, D., & Culp, K. M. (2005). Factors influencing outcomes from a technology-focused professional development program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(3), 313-329.
42. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). Teachers learning technology by design. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21(3), 94-102.
43. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy, and technology. Computers and Education, 49, 740-762. doi: 10. 1016/j. compedu. 2005. 11. 012.
44. Kopcha, T. J., & Sullivan, H. J. (2007). Self-presentation bias in surveys of teachers' educational technology practices. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(3), 265-286.
45. Lai, K.-W., Trewen, A., & Pratt, K. (2002). Computer coordinators as change agents: Some New Zealand observations. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 539-551.
46. Lei, J., & Zhao, Y. (2007). Technology uses and student achievement: A longitudinal study. Computers and Education, 49, 284-296. doi: 10. 1016/j. compedu. 2005. 06. 013.
47. Levin, T., & Wadamy, R. (2006-2007). Teachers' beliefs and practices in technology-based classrooms: A developmental view. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(2), 157-181.
48. Lim, C. P., & Khine, M. (2006). Managing teachers' barriers to ICT integration in Singapore schools. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 97-125.
49. Machin, S., McNally, S., & Silva, O. (2007). New technology in the schools: Is there a payoff? The Economic Journal, 117(522), 1145-1167. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1468-0297. 2007. 02070. x.
50. Marcovitz, D. M. (2000). The roles of computer coordinators in supporting technology in schools. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(3), 259-273.
51. Matzen, N. J., & Edmunds, J. A. (2007). Technology as a catalyst for change: The role of professional development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(4), 417-430.
52. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2004). Designing effective instruction (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
53. Neiderhauser, D. S., & Lindstrom, D. L. (2006). Addressing the NETS for students through constructivist technology use in K-12 classrooms. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(1), 91-128. doi: 10. 2190/E0X3-9CH0-EE2B-PLXG.
54. Norris, C., Sullivan, T., Poirot, J., & Soloway, E. (2003). No access, no use, no impact: Snapshot surveys of educational technology in K-12. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 15-27.
55. Polselli, R. (2002). Combining web-based training and mentorship to improve technology integration in the K-12 classroom. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(2), 247-272.
56. Rakes, G. C., Fields, V. S., & Cox, K. E. (2006). The influence of teachers' technology use on instructional practices. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 409-424.
57. Reiser, R. A., & Dick, W. (1996). Instructional planning: A guide for teachers (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
58. Rochelle, J., Pea, R., Hoadly, C., Gordin, D., & Means, B. (2001). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The Future of Children, 10(2), 76-101. doi: 10. 2307/1602690.
59. Smith, S. J., & Smith, S. B. (2004). Technology integration solutions: Preservice student interns as mentors. Assistive Technology: Benefits and Outcomes, 1, 42-56.
60. Snoeyink, R., & Ertmer, P. A. (2001-2002). Thrust into technology: How veteran teachers respond. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 30(1), 85-111. doi: 10. 2190/YDL7-XH09-RLJ6-MTP1.
61. Staples, A., Pugach, M. C., & Himes, D. (2005). Rethinking the technology integration challenge: Cases from three urban elementary schools. Journal from Research on Technology in Education, 37(3), 285-311.
62. Swan, B., & Dixon, J. (2006). The effects of mentor-supported technology professional development on middle school mathematics teachers' attitudes and practice. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(1), 67-86.
63. Swan, K., Holmes, A., Vargas, J. D., Jennings, S., Meier, E., & Rubenfeld, L. (2002). Situated professional development and technology integration: The capital area technology and inquiry in education (CATIE) mentoring program. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(2), 169-190.
64. Vanatta, R. A., & Fordham, N. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 253-271.
65. Waight, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2007). The impact of technology on the enactment of "Inquiry" in a technology enthusiast's sixth grade science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 154-182. doi: 10. 1002/tea. 20158.
66. Ward, J. R., West, L. S., & Isaak, T. J. (2002). Mentoring: A strategy for change in teacher technology education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 553-569.
67. Wells, J., & Lewis, L. (2006). Internet access in US public schools and classrooms: 1994-2005 (NCES 2007-020). US Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
68. Whitehead, B., Jensen, D., & Boschee, F. (2003). Planning for technology: A guide for school administrators, technology coordinators, and curriculum leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
69. Whitfield, C. M., & Latimer, B. T. (2003). A model for technology integration. Learning and Leading with Technology, 30(4), 50-55.
70. Zhao, Y., Lei, J., & Frank, K. A. (2006). The social life of technology: An ecological analysis of technology diffusion in schools. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 1(2), 135-149.
71. Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807-840. doi: 10. 3102/00028312040004807.
72. Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482-515. doi: 10. 1111/1467-9620. 00170.