Factors influencing outcomes from a technology-focused professional development program

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 315-329

  Kanaya, Tomoe ^a   Light, Daniel ^a   McMillanculp, Katherine ^a  

^a EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

In service learning; Longitudinal studies; Professional development; Technology integration

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011210177     PISSN: 15391523     EISSN: 19450818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2005.10782439     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anderson, R., & Becker, J. (2001). School investments in instructional technology Teaching, Learning, and Computing Report, Report 8. Retrieved August 2, 2004, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/report_8/startpage.htm.
2. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1992). Inside/out: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
3. Corcoran, T. B., Shields, P., & Zucker, A. (1998). The SSIs and professional development for teachers. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
4. Culp, K.M., Shankar, S., Gersick, A., & Pedersen, S. (2001). An evaluation of Intel Teach to the Future: Year one final report. New York: EDC Center for Children and Technology. Available: http://www.edc.org/cct.
5. Darling-Hammond, L., Lieberman, A., & McLaughlin, M. (1995). Practices and policies to support teacher development in an era of reform. New York: NCREST.
6. Dede, C. (1998) Introduction. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) Yearbook: Learning with Technology. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision of Curriculum Development.
7. Drazdowski, T. A. (1994). Preservice teachers and computer technology: A case study perspective. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 2(4), 251-263.
8. Fine, C., & L. Raack (1994). Professional development: Changing times. NCREL Policy Briefs 4.
9. Henriquez, A., & Riconscente, M. (1999). Rhone Island Teachers and Technology Initiative: Program evaluation final report. New York: EDC Center for Children and Technology. Retrieved August 28, 2004, from http://www2.edc.org/CCT/publications_report_summary.asp? numPubId=64.
10. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
11. Kennedy, M. (1999). Form and substance in mathematics and science professional development. NISE Brief, 3(2), 7. Madison: University ofWisconsin- Madison, National Institute for Science Education.
12. Lieberman, A. (1995). Practices that support teacher development. Phi Delta Kappan, April, 591-596.
13. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hawson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
14. Martin, W., Gersick, A., Nudell, H., & Culp, K. M. (2002). Evaluation of Intel Teach to the Future: Year two report. New York: Education Development Center Center for Children and Technology. Available: http://www.edc.org/cct.
15. Mitchem, K., Wells, D., & Wells, J. (2003). Effective integration of instructional technologies (IT): Evaluating professional development and instructional change. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(3), 397-414. [Electronic version]. Retrieved August 6, 2004, from http://dl.aace.org/13574.
16. National Commission on Teaching and Americas Future. (2003). No dream denied: A pledge to Americas children. Washington, DC: Author.
17. National Foundation for the Improvement of Education. (1996). Teachers take charge of their learning: Transforming professional development for student success. Washington, DC: Author.
18. National Partnership fcr Excellence and Accountability in Teaching (NPEAT). (1999). Characteristics of effective professional development. Retrieved July 20, 2004 from http://ed-web3.educ.msu.edu/npeat./
19. National Staff Development Council (NSDC) (2001). NSDC standards for staff development, revised. Available: http://www.nsdc.org/standards/index.cfm.
20. Office of Technology Assessment. (1988). Power on! New tools for teaching and learning (OTA-SET-379). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. Retrieved July 28, 2004, from http://www.wws.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/byteserv.prl/-ota/disk2/1988/8831/8831.PDF.
21. Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection (OTA-HER-616). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved August 2, 2004, from http://www.wws.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/byteserv.prl/-ota/diskl/l995/9541/9541.PDF.
22. Office of Technology Assessment. (2000). eLearning: Putting a world-class education at the fingertips of all children. Retrieved July 28, 2004, from http://www.ed.gov/Technology, elearning/e-learning.pdf.
23. Porter, A. C., Garet, M., Desimone, L., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. (2000). Does professional development change teaching practice? Results from a three-year study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
24. Riel, M., & Becker, H. (2000, April). The beliefs, practices, and computer use of teacher leaders. Paper presented at the meeting of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Retrieved August, 2, 2004, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/aera/startpage.html.
25. SRI International. (2002. May). Technology-related professional development in the context of educational reform: A literature review. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Education uncer GSA Contract # GS-35F-5537H.
26. The CEO Forum on Education and Technology. (1999). School technology and readiness report. Professional development: A link to better learning. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved July 9, 2003, from http://www.ceoforum.org/downloads/99report.pdf.
27. U.S. Department of Education. (1999). Designing effective professional development: Lessons from the Eisenhower program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
28. U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Digest of education statistics, 2002. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
29. Weiss, I. R., Montgomery, D. L., Ridgway, C. J., & Bond, S. (1998). High-lights of the local systemic change through teacher enhancement year three crosssite report. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research