The influence of teachers' technology use on instructional practices

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 409-424

  Rakes, Glenda C ^a   Fields, Valerie S ^b   Cox, Karee E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Constructivism; Levels of technology implementation

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008826265     PISSN: 15391523     EISSN: 19450818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2006.10782467     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Becker, H. J., & Ravitz, J. (1999). The influence of computer and Internet use on teachers’ pedagogical practices and perceptions. Journal of Research on Computers in Education. 31(4), 356-379.
2. Beeson, E., & Strange, M. (2003, February). Why rural matters 2003: The continuing needfor every state to take action on rural education. A report of the Rural School and Community Trust Policy Program [Online]. Available: http://www.ruraledu.org/site/apps/nl/content3.asp?c=beJMIZOCIrH&b=1000115&ct=1147039
3. Bracey, G. W. (2002). Raising achievement of at-risk students or not. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(6), 431-432.
4. Brooks, J. G. (2004). To see beyond the lesson. Educational Leadership, 62(1), 8-12.
5. Collins, T., & Dewees, S. (2001). Challenge and promise: Technology in the classroom. Southern Rural Development Center, 18, 1-6.
6. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Dawson, C. & Rakes, G. C. (2003). The influence of principals’ technology training on the integration of technology into schools. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 29-49.
8. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Free Press.
9. Doherty, K. M., & Orlofsky, G. F. (2001). Student survey says: Schools are probably not using educational technology as wisely or effectively as they could. Education Week, 20(35), 45-48.
10. Dwyer, D. C. (1994). Apple classrooms of tomorrow: What we’ve learned. Educational Leadership, 52, 4-10.
11. Fuller, H. L. (2000). First teach their teachers: Technology support and computer use in academic subjects. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(4), 511-535.
12. Iding, M., Crosby, M. E., & Speitel, T. (2002). Teachers and technology: Beliefs and practices. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(2), 153-171.
13. Ingersoll, R. M. (2004). Why do high-poverty schools have difficulty staffing their classrooms with qualified teachers? (Report prepared for Renewing Our Schools, Securing Our Future—A National Task Force on Public Education). Washington, DC: The Center for American Progress and the Institute for America’s Future. Retrieved December 27, 2004, from http://www.americanpr0gress.0rg/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ80VF&b=252682.
14. McKenzie, J. (2001). How teachers learn technology best. From Now On, 10(6). Retrieved December 14, 2005, from http://www.fno.org/mar01/howlearn.html.
15. Middleton, B. M., & Murray, R. K. (1999). The impact of instructional technology on student academic achievement in reading and mathematics. International Journal of Instructional Media, 26(1), 109-116.
16. Moersch, C. (1995). Levels of technology implementation (LoTi): A frame-work for measuring classroom technology use. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23(3), 40-42.
17. Moersch, C. (1998). Enhancing students’ thinking skills. Learning and Leading with Technology, 25(6), 50-53.
18. Moersch, C. (1999). Assessing current technology use in the classroom: A key to efficient staff development and technology planning. Learning and Leading with Technology, 26(8), 40-49.
19. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. New York: Harper Collins.
20. Papert, S. (1994). The childrens machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books.
21. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
22. Perchman, E. M. (1992). Child as meaning maker: The organizing theme for professional practice schools. In M. Levine (Ed.), Professional practice schools (pp. 25-62). New York: Teachers College Press.
23. Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent. New York: Grossman.
24. Rakes, G. C., Flowers, B. F., Casey, H. B, & Santana, R. (1999). An analysis of instructional technology use and constructivist behaviors in K—12 teachers. International Journal of Educational Technology, 1(2). Retrieved December 14, 2005, from http://smi.curtin.edu.au/ijet/vln2/rakes/index.html.
25. Reeves, T. (1998, February). The impact of media and technology in schools. A research report prepared for the Berteslemann Foundation. Available: http://www.athensacademy.org/instruct/media_tech/reeves0.html.
26. Richardson, V. (1997). Constructivist teaching and teacher education: Theory and practice. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Constructivist teacher education: Building a world of new understandings (pp. 3-14). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
27. Riley, R. W. (2002). Education reform through standards and partnerships, 1993-2000. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(9), 700-707.
28. Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D.C. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College.
29. Trimble, S. (2003). Between reform and improvement in the classroom. Principal Leadership, 4(1), 35-39.
30. von Glasersfeld, E. (1981). The concepts of adoption and viability in a radical constructivist theory of knowledge. In I. E. Sigel, D. M. Broinsky, & R. M. Golinkoff (Eds.), New directions in Piagetian theory and practice (pp. 87-95). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Voss, J. F., & Post, T. A. (1998). On the solving of ill-structured problems. In M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 261-285). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Wenglinsky, H. (2004). Facts or critical thinking skills? What NAEP results say. Educational Leadership, 62(1), 32-35.
34. White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3-18.