Cognitive processes in implicit attitude tasks: An experimental validation of the Trip Model

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 254-268

  Nadarevic, Lena ^a   Erdfelder, Edgar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951845619     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.776     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ansorge, U., & Wühr, P. (2004). A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 365-377.
2. Ansorge, U., & Wühr, P. (2008). Transfer of response codes from choice-response to go/no-go tasks. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1216-1235.
3. Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitudes can be measured. In H. L. Roedinger, I. N. Nairne, & A. M. Sprenant (Eds.), The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 117-149). Washington D.C.: APA.
4. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 57-86.
5. Boysen, G. A., Vogel, D. L., & Madon, S. (2006). A public versus private administration of the Implicit Association Test. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 845-856.
6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (second edition). Hilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Conrey, F. R., Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., Hugenberg, K., & Groom, C. J. (2005). Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: The quad model of implicit task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 469-487.
8. Danielmeier, C., Zysset, S., Müsseler, J., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2004). Where action impairs visual encoding: An event-related fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 21, 39-48.
9. Degner, J., & Wentura, D. (2008). The extrinsic affective Simon task as an instrument for indirect assessment of prejudice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1033-1043.
10. De Houwer, J. (2003). The extrinsic affective Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 50, 77-85.
11. Erdfelder, E., Auer, T.-S., Hilbig, B. E., Aßfalg, A., Moshagen, M., & Nadarevic, L. (2009). Multinomial processing tree models: A review of the literature. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 108-124.
12. Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., & Hohnsbein, J. (1999). ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychologica, 101, 267-291.
13. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analysis using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149-1160.
14. Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and uses. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327.
15. Foroni, F., & Bel-Bahar, T. (2010). Picture-IAT versus Word-IAT: Level of stimulus representation influences on the IAT. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 321-337.
16. Foroni, F., & Mayr, U. (2005). The power of a story: New, automatic associations from a single reading of a short scenario. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 139-144.
17. Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2007). A model of the go/no-go task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 389-413.
18. Gonsalkorale, K., Sherman, J. W., & Klauer, K. C. (2009). Aging and prejudice: Diminished regulation of automatic race bias among older adults. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 410-414.
19. Gonsalkorale, K., von Hippel, W., Sherman, J. W., & Klauer, K. C. (2009). Bias and regulation of bias in intergroup interactions: Implicit attitudes toward Muslims and interaction quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 161-166.
20. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
21. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216.
22. Johnstone, S. J., Pleffer, C. B., Barry, R. J., Clarke, A. R., & Smith, J. L. (2005). Development of inhibitory processing during the go/nogo task: A behavioral and event-related potential study of children and adults. Journal of Psychophysiology, 19, 11-23.
23. Klauer, K. C. (2006). Hierarchical multinomial processing tree models: A latent-class approach. Psychometrica, 71, 7-31.
24. Klauer, K. C., Schmitz, F., Teige-Mocigemba, S., & Voss, A. (2010). Understanding the role of executive control in the Implicit Association Test: Why flexible people have small IAT effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 595-619.
25. Klauer, K. C., & Wegener, I. (1998). Unraveling social categorization in the "who said what?" paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1155-1178.
26. Koch, I., & Prinz, W. (2005). Response preparation and code overlap in dual tasks. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1085-1095.
27. Menon, V., Adleman, N. E., White, C. D., Glover, G. H., & Reiss, A. L. (2001). Error-related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task. Human Brain Mapping, 12, 131-141.
28. Moshagen, M. (2010). MultiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 42-50.
29. Müsseler, J., & Wühr, P. (2002). Response-evoked interference in visual encoding. In W. Prinz, & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance, Vol. XIX (pp. 520-537). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., van den Wildenberg, W., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 17-26.
31. Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). The Go/No-go Association Task. Social Cognition, 19, 625-666.
32. Nosek, B. A., & Smyth, F. L. (2007). A multitrait-multimethod validation of the Implicit Association Test: Implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs. Experimental Psychology, 54, 14-29.
33. Read, T. R. C., & Cressie, N. A. C. (1988). Goodness-of-fit statistics for discrete multivariate data. New York: Springer-Verlag.
34. Rudolph, A., Schröder-Abé, M., Schütz, A., Gregg, A. P., & Sedikides, C. (2008). Through a glass, less darkly? Reassessing convergent and discriminant validity in measures of implicit self-esteem. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 273-281.
35. Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., Gonsalkorale, K., Hugenberg, K., Allen, T. J., & Groom, C. J. (2008). The self-regulation of automatic associations and behavioral impulses. Psychological Review, 115, 314-335.
36. Sriram, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2009). The brief Implicit Association Test. Experimental Psychology, 56, 283-294.
37. Stahl, C., & Degner, J. (2007). Assessing automatic activation of valence: A multinomial model of EAST performance. Experimental Psychology, 54, 99-112.
38. Stahl, C., & Klauer, K. C. (2007). HMMTree: A computer program for hierarchical multinomial models. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 267-273.
39. Steffens, M. C. (2004). Is the Implicit Association Test immune to faking? Experimental Psychology, 51, 165-179.
40. Steffens, M. C., & Jonas, K. J. (2010). Implicit attitude measures. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 218, 1-3.
41. Steffens, M. C., Lichau, J., Still, Y., Jelenec, P., Anheuser, J., & Goergens, N. K., et al. (2004). Individuum oder Gruppe, Exemplar oder Kategorie? Ein Zweifaktorenmodell zur Erklärung der Reaktionszeitunterschiede im Implicit Association Test (IAT). [Individual or group, exemplar or category? A two-factor model for the explanation of reaction time differences in the Implicit Association Test (IAT)]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 212, 57-65.
42. von Stülpnagel, R., & Steffens, M. C. (2010). Prejudiced or just smart? Intelligence as a confounding factor in the IAT effect. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 218, 51-53.