Assessing automatic activation of valence a multinomial model of EAST performance

Experimental Psychology

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 99-112

  Stahl, Christoph ^a   Degner, Juliane ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Automatic processing of valence; EAST; Evaluative conditioning; Latent class hierarchical multinomial processing tree models

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFFECT; AUTOMATISM; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; REVIEW;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFFECT; AUTOMATISM; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOLOGY; VOCABULARY;

EID: 34247153488     PISSN: 16183169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.54.2.99     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Batchelder, W.H., & Riefer, D.M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 57-86.
2. Beckers, T., De Houwer, J., & Eelen, P. (2002). Automatic integration of nonperceptual action effect features: The case of the associative affective Simon effect. Psychological Research, 66, 166-173.
3. Brendl, C.M., Markman, A.B., & Messner, C. (2001). How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 760-773.
4. Brickenkamp, R. (2002). Aufmerksamkeits-Belastungs-Test [The D2 Test of Attention] (9th ed.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
5. Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., & Vaterrodt-Plünnecke, B. (1995). Toward unbiased measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes within the process dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 137-160.
6. Conrey, F., Sherman, J.W., Gawronski, B., Hugenberg, K., & Groom, C.J. (2005). Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: The quad model of implicit task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 469-487.
7. De Houwer, J. (2001). A structural and process analysis of the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 443-451.
8. De Houwer, J. (2003). The extrinsic affective Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 50, 77-85.
9. De Houwer, J., Crombez, G., Baeyens, F., & Hermans, D. (2001). On the generality of the affective Simon effect. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 189-206.
10. De Houwer, J., & Eelen, P. (1998). An affective variant of the Simon paradigm. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 45-62.
11. Fazio, R.H., Sanbonmatsu, D.M., Powell, M.C., & Kardes, F.R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229-238.
12. Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E., & Schwartz, J.L.K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
13. Hager, W., & Hasselhorn, M. (Eds.). (1994). Handbuch deutschsprachiger Wortnormen [Handbook of German word norms]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
14. Jacoby, L.L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
15. Karpinski, A. (2004). Measuring self-esteem using the Implicit Association Test: The role of the other. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 22-34.
16. Klauer, K.C. (2006). Hierarchical multinomial processing tree models: A latent-class approach. Psychometrika, 71, 1-31.
17. Klauer, K.C., & Mierke, J. (2005). Task-set inertia, attitude accessibility, and compatibility-order effects: New evidence for a task-set switching account of the Implicit Association Test effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 208-217.
18. Lang, P.J., Bradley, M.M., & Cuthbert, B.N. (2005). International affective picture system (IAPS): Digitized photographs, instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical Report A-6, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
19. Mierke, J., & Klauer, K.C. (2003). Method-specific variance in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1180-1192.
20. Payne, B.K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181-192.
21. Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J.N. (1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9, 347-356.
22. Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2001). Figure-ground asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 94-106.
23. Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2004). Underlying processes in the Implicit Association Test: Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 139-165.
24. Stahl, C., & Klauer, K.C. (in press). HMMTree: A computer program for hierarchical multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods.
25. Voss, A., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2003). Estimating the valence of single stimuli: A new variant of the affective Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 50, 86-96.
26. Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151-175.