Transfer of response codes from choice-response to go/no-go tasks

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 62, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1216-1235

  Ansorge, Ulrich ^a,b   Wuhr, Peter ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Go no go task; Response discrimination account; Simon effect; Spatial stimulus response correspondence; Transfer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COLOR VISION; DECISION MAKING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COLOR PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67651251253     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210802426866     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ansorge, U., & Wühr, P. (2004). A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 365-377.
2. Buhlmann, I., Umiltà, C., & Wascher, E. (2007). Response coding and visuomotor transformation in the Simon task: The role of action goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1269-1282.
3. Callan, J., Klisz, D., & Parsons, O. A. (1974). Strength of auditory stimulus-response compatibility as a function of task complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 1039-1045.
4. Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
5. Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention. Psychological Research, 55, 270-279.
6. Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research, 56, 261-268.
7. Hommel, B. (1996). S-R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 546-571.
8. Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849-878.
9. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus -response compatibility - a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
10. Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174-207.
11. Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279-281.
12. Neill, W. T. (1997). Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1291-1305.
13. Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2006). Stimulus- response compatibility principles. Data, theory, and application. Boca-Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
14. Proctor, R. W., Vu, K.-P. L., & Nicoletti, R. (2003). Does left-right prevalence occur for the Simon effect? Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1318-1329.
15. Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446-461.
16. Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002). Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.), Attention & performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action (pp. 494-519). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17. Roswarski, T. E., & Proctor, R. W. (1996). Multiple spatial codes and temporal overlap in choice-reaction tasks. Psychological Research, 59, 196-211.
18. Roswarski, T. E., & Proctor, R. W. (2003). Intrahemispherical activation, visuomotor transmission, and the Simon effect: Comment on Wascher et al. (2001). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 152-158.
19. Shiu, L.-P., & Kornblum, S. (1996). Negative priming and stimulus-response compatibility. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 510-514.
20. Shiu, L.-P., & Kornblum, S. (1999). Stimulus-response compatibility effects in go-no-go tasks: A dimensional overlap account. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1613-1623.
21. Simon, J. R. (1990). The effect of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus -response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 31-88). Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland.
22. Stoffer, T. H. (1991). Attentional focusing and spatial stimulus - response compatibility. Psychological Research, 53, 127-135.
23. Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., Umiltá, C., & Bassignani, F. (2000). The role of LTM links and STM links in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 648-670.
24. Valle-Inclán, F., & Redondo, M. (1998). On the auto-maticity of ipsilateral response activation in the Simon effect. Psychophysiology, 35, 366-371.
25. Van der Lubbe, R. H. J., & Woestenburg, J. C. (1999). The influence of peripheral cues on the tendency to react towards a lateral relevant stimulus with multiple-item arrays. Biological Psychology, 51, 1-21.
26. Wascher, E., Schatz, U., Kuder, T., & Verleger, R. (2001). Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 731-751.
27. Wiegand, K., & Wascher, E. (2005). Dynamic aspects of stimulus-response correspondence: Evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 453-464.
28. Wühr, P. (2006). The Simon effect in vocal responses. Acta Psychologica, 121, 210-226.
29. Wühr, P., & Ansorge, U. (2007). A Simon effect in memory retrieval: Evidence for the response-discrimination account. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 984-988.
30. Wühr, P., Biebl, R., & Ansorge, U. (2008). The impact of stimulus and response variability on S-R correspondence effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 533-545.
31. Zhang, H., Zhang, J., & Kornblum, S. (1999). A parallel distributed processing model of stimulus -stimulus and stimulus - response compatibility. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 386-432.
32. Zorzi, M., & Umiltà, C. (1995). A computational model of the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 58, 193-205.