Clinical evaluation of two packable posterior composites: 2-year follow-up

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 197-203

  Fagundes, T C ^a   Barata, T J E ^a   Bresciani, E ^a   Cefaly, D F G ^b   Jorge, M F F ^c   Navarro, M F L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDADE NORTE DO PARANÁ   (Brazil)

^c Military Police of Bauru   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Composite; Direct restoration; Esthetics; Posterior teeth

Indexed keywords

ALERT COMPOSITE RESIN; BOND 1 ADHESIVE; BOND-1 ADHESIVE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PRIME & BOND NT; RESIN; SUREFIL PACKABLE COMPOSITE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH DISEASE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); METHACRYLATES; MOLAR; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 33747197771     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-006-0059-y     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA (1996) 2-year clinical evaluation of class I posterior composites. Am J Dent 9:150-152
2. Al-Sharaa KA, Watts DC (2003) Stickiness prior to setting of some light cured resin-composites. Dent Mater 19:182-187
3. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A (2005) Polymerization contraction of resin composite vs. energy and power density of light-cure. Eur J Oral Sci 113:417-421
4. Bayne SC, Schmalz G (2005) Reprinting the classic article on USPHS evaluation methods for measuring the clinical research performance of restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig 9:209-214
5. Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Heymann HO (1992) Protection hypothesis for composite wear. Dent Mater 8:305-309
6. Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Swift EJ (1994) Update on dental composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 125:687-701
7. Bernhardt O, Gesch D, Splieth C, Schwahn C, Mack F, Kocher T, Meyer G, John U, Kordass B (2004) Risk factors for high occlusal wear scores in a population-based sample: Results of the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP). Int J Prosthodont 17:333-339
8. Blalock JS, Chan DC, Browning WD, Callan R, Hackman S (2006) Measurement of clinical wear of two packable composites after 6 months in service. J Oral Rehabil 3:59-63
9. Brunthaler A, Konig F, Lucas T, Sperr W, Schedle A (2003) Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig 7:63-70
10. Chen HY, Manhart J, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH (2001) Polymerization contraction stress in light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 17:253-259
11. Cobb DS, MacGregor KM, Vargas MA, Denehy GE (2000) The physical properties of packable and conventional posterior resin-based composites: A comparison. J Am Dent Assoc 131:1610-1615
12. Downer MC, Azli NA, Bedi R, Moles DR, Setchell DJ (1999) How long do routine dental restorations last? A systematic review. Br Dent J 187:432-439
13. Duke ES (2000) Packable composites for posterior clinical applications. Compend Contin Educ Dent 21:604-605
14. Ernst CP, Martin M, Stuff S, Willershausen B (2001) Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for posterior teeth after 3 years. Clin Oral Investig 5:148-155
15. Ernst CP, Canbek K, Aksogan K, Willershausen B (2003) Two-year clinical performance of a packable posterior composite with and without a flowable composite liner. Clin Oral Investig 7:129-134
16. Ferracane JL, Choi KK, Condon JR (1999) In vitro wear of packable dental composites. Compend Contin Educ Dent 25:S60-S66 (quiz S74)
17. Hickel R, Manhart J (2001) Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 3:45-64
18. Jacobsen T (2003) Bonding of resin to dentin. Interactions between materials, substrate and operators. Swed Dent J (160):1-66 (Suppl)
19. Kelsey WP, Latta MA, Shaddy RS, Stanislav CM (2000) Physical properties of three packable resin-composite restorative materials. Oper Dent 25:331-335
20. Kohler B, Rasmusson CG, Odman P (2000) A five-year clinical evaluation of class II composite resin restorations. J Dent 28:111-116
21. Lee I-B, Son H-H, Um C-M (2003) Rheologic properties of flowable, conventional hybrid, and condensable composite resins. Dent Mater 19:298-307
22. Leinfelder KF (1996) A conservative approach to placing posterior composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 127:738-743
23. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Rodrigues Filho LE, Busato ALS (2001) One-year clinical evaluation of posterior packable resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 26:427-434
24. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Hernandez PA, Macedo RP, Busato AL (2006) 3-Year clinical evaluation of posterior packable composite resin restorations. J Oral Rehabil 33:144-151
25. Lopes LG, Cefaly DFG, Franco EB, Mondelli RFL, Lauris JRP, Navarro MFL (2002) Clinical evaluation of two "packable" posterior composite resins. Clin Oral Investig 6:79-83
26. Lopes LG, Cefaly DFG, Franco EB, Mondelli RFL, Lauris JRP, Navarro MFL (2003) Clinical evaluation of two "packable" posterior composite resins: Two-year results. Clin Oral Investig 7:123-128
27. Lutz F, Krejci I (1999) Resin composites in the post-amalgam age. Compend Contin Educ Dent 20:1138-1148
28. Manhart J, Kunzelmann K-H, Chen HY, Hickel R (2000) Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 16:33-40
29. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hickel R (2001) The suitability of packable resin-based composites for posterior restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 132:639-645
30. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R (2004) Buonocore memorial lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 29:481-508
31. Nagem Filho H, D'Azevedo MTFS, Nagem HD, Marsola FP (2003) Surface roughness of composite resins after finishing and polishing. Braz Dent J 14:37-41
32. Obici AC, Sinhoreti MA, de Goes MF, Consani S, Sobrinho LC (2002) Effect of the photo-activation method on polymerization shrinkage of restorative composites. Oper Dent 27:192-198
33. Opdam NJ, Roeters JJ, Joosten M, Veeke O (2002) Porosities and voids in class I restorations placed by six operators using a packable or syringable composite. Dent Mater 18:58-63
34. Perdigão J, Lopes M (1999) Dentin bonding - questions for the new millennium. J Adhes Dent 1:191-209
35. Perry R, Kugel G (2000) Two-year clinical evaluation of a high-density posterior restorative material. Compend Contin Educ Dent 21:1067-1078
36. Perry R, Kugel G, Leinfelder KF (1999) One-year clinical evaluation of Surefil packable composite. Compend Contin Educ Dent 20:544-553
37. Pigno MA, Hatch JP, Rodrigues-Garcia RC, Sakai S, Rugh JD (2001) Severity, distribution, and correlates of occlusal tooth wear in a sample of Mexican-American and European-American adults. Int J Prosthodont 14:65-70
38. Poon EC, Smales RJ, Yip KH (2005) Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid posterior resin-based composites: Results at 3.5 years. J Am Dent Assoc 136:1533-1540
39. Rahiotis C, Tzoutzas J, Kakaboura A (2004) In vitro marginal adaptation of high-viscosity resin composite restorations bonded to dentin cavities. J Adhes Dent 6:49-53
40. Reis AF, Giannini M, Lovadino JR, Ambrosano GM (2003) Effects of various finishing systems on the surface roughness and staining susceptibility of packable composite resins. Dent Mater 19:12-18
41. Roulet JF (1997) Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam. J Dent 25(6):459-473
42. Ryba TM, Dunn WJ, Murchison DF (2002) Surface roughness of various packable composites. Oper Dent 27:243-247
43. Ryge G (1980) Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 30:347-358
44. Souza FB, Guimaraes RP, Silva CH (2005) A clinical evaluation of packable and microhybrid resin composite restorations: One-year report. Quintessence Int 36:41-48
45. Taylor DF, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD (1989) Comparison of direct and indirect methods for analyzing wear of posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater 5:157-160
46. Turkun LS, Turkun M, Ozata F (2003) Two-year clinical evaluation of a packable resin-based composite. J Am Dent Assoc 134:1205-1212
47. Turkun LS, Turkun M, Ozata F (2005) Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for a period of 3 years. Quintessence Int 36:365-372
48. Uno S, Asmussen E (1991) Marginal adaptation of a restorative resin polymerized at reduced rate. Scand J Dent Res 99:440-444
49. van Dijken JW (2003) A 6-year clinical evaluation of class I poly-acid modified resin composite/resin composite laminate restorations cured with a two-step curing technique. Dent Mater 19:423-428
50. Wilson MA, Cowan AJ, Randall RC, Crisp RJ, Wilson NHF (2002) A practice-based, randomized, controlled clinical trial of a new resin composite restorative: One-year results. Oper Dent 27:423-429
51. Yip KH, Poon BK, Chu FC, Poon EC, Kong FY, Smales RJ (2003) Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin-based composites for posterior restorations in permanent teeth: Results at 12 months. J Am Dent Assoc 134:1581-1589