An up to 3-year randomized clinical study comparing indirect and direct resin composites used to restore worn posterior teeth

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 613-617

  Bartlett, David ^a   Sundaram, Geeta ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; HELIOMOLAR; POLYURETHAN; RESIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; PATHOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH DISEASE;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ADULT; AGED; BICUSPID; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; POLYURETHANES; TOOTH ATTRITION; TOOTH EROSION;

EID: 33845670387     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Smith BGN, Knight JK. A comparison of patterns of tooth wear with aetiological factors. Br Dent J 1984;157:16-19.
2. Smith BGN, Bartlett DW, Robb ND. The prevalence, etiology and management of tooth wear in the United Kingdom. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:367-372.
3. Lussi A, Jaeggi T, Schaffner M. Prevention and minimally invasive treatment of erosions. Oral Health Prev Dent 2004;2 Suppl 1:321-325.
4. Azzopardi A, Bartlett DW, Watson TF, Sherriff M. The surface effects of erosion and abrasion on dentine with and without a protective layer. Br Dent J 2004;196:351-354.
5. Bartlett DW. Three patient reports illustrating the use of dentin adhesives to cement crowns to severely worn teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:214-218.
6. Wassell RW, Walls AW, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: 5-year follow-up. J Dent 2000;28:375-382.
7. Wassell RW, Walls AW, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: Three-year clinical results. Br Dent J 1995;179:343-349.
8. Pallesen U, Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig 2003;7:71-79.
9. Scheibenbogen A, Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Kremers L, Benz C, Hickel R. One-year clinical evaluation of composite fillings and inlays in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig 1997;1:65-70.
10. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980;30:347-358.
11. Ryge G. Editorial: Evaluation of clinical quality and professional performance. J Dent Educ 1975;39:582-583.
12. Hemmings KW, Darbar UR, Vaughan S. Tooth wear treated with direct composite restorations at an increased vertical dimension: Results at 30 months. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:287-293.
13. Redman CD, Hemmings KW, Good JA. The survival and clinical performance of resin-based composite restorations used to treat localised anterior tooth wear. Br Dent J 2003;194:566-572.
14. Gow AM, Hemmings KW. The treatment of localised anterior tooth wear with indirect Artglass restorations at an increased occlusal vertical dimension. Results after two years. Eur J Prosthodont Restorative Dent 2002;10:101-105.
15. Knibbs PJ, Smart ER. The clinical performance of a posterior composite resin restorative material, Heliomolar RO: 3-year report. J Oral Rehabil 1992;19:231-237.
16. Alhadainy HA, Abdalla AI. Two-year clinical evaluation of dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent 1996;9:77-79.
17. Clelland NL, Villarroel SC, Knobloch LA, Seghi RR. Simulated oral wear of packable composites. Oper Dent 2003;28:830-837.
18. Knobloch LA, Kerby RE, Seghi R, Berlin JS, Clelland N. Fracture toughness of packable and conventional composite materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:307-313.
19. Burke FJ, Qualtrough AJ, Wilson NHF. A retrospective evaluation of a series of dentin-bonded ceramic crowns. Quintessence Int 1998;29:103-106.
20. Burke FJ, Qualtrough AJ. Follow-up evaluation of a series of dentin-bonded ceramic restorations. J Esthet Dent 2000;12:16-22.