Two-body wear of artificial acrylic and composite resin teeth in relation to antagonist material

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 101, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 269-278

  Hahnel, Sebastian ^a   Behr, Michael ^a   Handel, Gerhard ^a   Rosentritt, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; DENTAL ALLOY; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; RESIN; SILICON DIOXIDE; STEATITE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; SILICON DIOXIDE; TOOTH, ARTIFICIAL;

EID: 62849117533     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60051-2     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Stober T., Lutz T., Gilde H., and Rammelsberg P. Wear of resin denture teeth by two-body contact. Dent Mater 22 (2006) 243-249
2. Powers J.M., and Sakaguchi R.L. Craig's restorative dental materials. 12th ed. (2006), Elsevier, St. Louis 544-546
3. Ghazal M., Yang B., Ludwig K., and Kern M. Two-body wear of resin and ceramic denture teeth in comparison to human enamel. Dent Mater 24 (2008) 502-507
4. Heintze S.D., Zappini G., and Rousson V. Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators-results of a round robin test. Dent Mater 21 (2005) 304-317
5. von Fraunhofer J.A., Razavi R., and Khan Z. Wear characteristics of high-strength denture teeth. J Prosthet Dent 59 (1988) 173-175
6. Ghazal M., Steiner M., and Kern M. Wear resistance of artificial denture teeth. Int J Prosthodont 21 (2008) 166-168
7. Ohlmann B., Rohstock K., Kugler J., Gilde H., Nat R., Dreyhaupt J., et al. Influences on clinical wear of acrylic denture teeth: a pilot study. Int J Prosthodont 20 (2007) 496-498
8. Whitman D.J., McKinney J.E., Hinman R.W., Hesby R.A., and Pelleu G.B. In vitro wear rates of three types of commercial denture tooth materials. J Prosthet Dent 57 (1987) 243-246
9. Suzuki S. In vitro wear of nano-composite denture teeth. J Prosthodont 13 (2004) 238-243
10. Abe Y., Sato Y., Akagawa Y., and Ohkawa S. An in vitro study of high-strength resin posterior denture tooth wear. Int J Prosthodont 10 (1997) 28-34
11. Winkler S., Monasky G.E., and Kwok J. Laboratory wear investigation of resin posterior denture teeth. J Prosthet Dent 67 (1992) 812-814
12. Hirano S., May K.B., Wagner W.C., and Hacker C.H. In vitro wear of resin denture teeth. J Prosthet Dent 79 (1998) 152-155
13. Ogle R.E., and Davis E.L. Clinical wear study of three commercially available artificial tooth materials: thirty-six month results. J Prosthet Dent 79 (1998) 145-151
14. Lindquist T.J., Ogle R.E., and Davis E.L. Twelve-month results of a clinical wear study of three artificial tooth materials. J Prosthet Dent 74 (1995) 156-161
15. Jooste C., Geerts G., and Adams L. Comparison of the clinical abrasion resistance of six commercially available denture teeth. J Prosthet Dent 77 (1997) 23-27
16. Ghazal M., Albashaireh Z.S., and Kern M. Wear resistance of nanofilled composite resin and feldspathic ceramic artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent 100 (2008) 441-448
17. Zeng J., Sato Y., Ohkubo C., and Hosoi T. In vitro wear resistance of three types of composite resin denture teeth. J Prosthet Dent 94 (2005) 453-457
18. Ekfeldt A., and Karlsson S. Changes of masticatory movement characteristics after prosthodontic rehabilitation of individuals with extensive tooth wear. Int J Prosthodont 9 (1996) 539-546
19. Bani D., Bani T., and Bergamini M. Morphologic and biochemical changes of the masseter muscles induced by occlusal wear: studies in a rat model. J Dent Res 78 (1999) 1735-1744
20. Krejci I., Albert P., and Lutz F. The influence of antagonist standardization on wear. J Dent Res 78 (1999) 713-719
21. Heintze S.D., Cavalleri A., Forjanic M., Zellweger G., and Rousson V. Wear of ceramic and antagonist-a systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro. Dent Mater 24 (2008) 433-449
22. Wassell R.W., McCabe J.F., and Walls A.W. A two-body frictional wear test. J Dent Res 73 (1994) 1546-1553
23. Wassell R.W., McCabe J.F., and Walls A.W. Wear characteristics in a two-body wear test. Dent Mater 10 (1994) 269-274
24. Shortall A.C., Hu X.Q., and Marquis P.M. Potential countersample materials for in vitro simulation wear testing. Dent Mater 18 (2002) 246-254
25. Rosentritt M., Behr M., Gebhard R., and Handel G. Influence of stress simulation parameters on the fracture strength of all-ceramic fixed-partial dentures. Dent Mater 22 (2006) 176-182
26. Heintze S.D., Cavalleri A., Forjanic M., Zellweger G., and Rousson V. A comparison of three different methods for the quantification of the in vitro wear of dental materials. Dent Mater 22 (2006) 1051-1062