The effect of bifocal add on accommodative lag in myopic children with high accommodative lag

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 51, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 6104-6110

  Berntsen, David A ^a   Mutti, Donald O ^a   Zadnik, Karla ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ACCOMMODATION LAG; ARTICLE; BIFOCAL LENS; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MONOCULAR VISION; MYOPIA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGRESSIVE ADDITION LENS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SINGLE VISION LENS; TREATMENT RESPONSE; VISION TEST; VISUAL AID;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; CHILD; DISEASE PROGRESSION; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; EYEGLASSES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MYOPIA; REFRACTION, OCULAR;

EID: 79751500526     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4417     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Rosenfield M, Gilmartin B, eds. Myopia and Nearwork. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998:220.
2. Charman WN. Near vision, lags of accommodation and myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1999;19:126-133.
3. Goss DA, Hampton MJ, Wickham MG. Selected review on genetic factors in myopia. J Am Optom Assoc. 1988;59:875-884.
4. Goss DA, Rainey BB. Relationship of accommodative response and nearpoint phoria in a sample of myopic children. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:292-294.
5. Gwiazda J, Thorn F, Bauer J, Held R. Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:690-694.
6. Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Hayes JR, et al. Accommodative lag before and after the onset of myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47:837-846.
7. Hung LF, Crawford ML, Smith EL. Spectacle lenses alter eye growth and the refractive status of young monkeys. Nat Med. 1995;1:761-765.
8. Schaeffel F, Glasser A, Howland HC. Accommodation, refractive error and eye growth in chickens. Vision Res. 1988;28:639-657.
9. Shaikh AW, Siegwart JT Jr, Norton TT. Effect of interrupted lens wear on compensation for a minus lens in tree shrews. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:308-315.
10. Smith EL 3rd, Hung LF. The role of optical defocus in regulating refractive development in infant monkeys. Vision Res. 1999;39: 1415-1435.
11. Wallman J, Wildsoet C, Xu A, et al. Moving the retina: choroidal modulation of refractive state. Vision Res. 1995;35:37-50.
12. Whatham AR, Judge SJ. Compensatory changes in eye growth and refraction induced by daily wear of soft contact lenses in young marmosets. Vision Res. 2001;41:267-273.
13. Edwards MH, Li RW, Lam CS, Lew JK, Yu BS. The Hong Kong progressive lens myopia control study: study design and main findings. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:2852-2858.
14. Fulk GW, Cyert LA, Parker DE. A randomized trial of the effect of single-vision vs. bifocal lenses on myopia progression in children with esophoria. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77:395-401.
15. Gwiazda J, Hyman L, Hussein M, et al. A randomized clinical trial of progressive addition lenses versus single vision lenses on the progression of myopia in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:1492-1500.
16. Hasebe S, Ohtsuki H, Nonaka T, et al. Effect of progressive addition lenses on myopia progression in Japanese children: a prospective, randomized, double-masked, crossover trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:2781-2789.
17. Gwiazda JE, Hyman L, Norton TT, et al. Accommodation and related risk factors associated with myopia progression and their interaction with treatment in COMET children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2143-2151.
18. Seidemann A, Schaeffel F. An evaluation of the lag of accommodation using photorefraction. Vision Res. 2003;43:419-430.
19. Shapiro JA, Kelly JE, Howland HC. Accommodative state of young adults using reading spectacles. Vision Res. 2005;45: 233-245.
20. Sreenivasan V, Irving EL, Bobier WR. Binocular adaptation to near addition lenses in emmetropic adults. Vision Res. 2008;48:1262-1269.
21. Jiang BC, Tea YC, O'Donnell D. Changes in accommodative and vergence responses when viewing through near addition lenses. Optometry. 2007;78:129-134.
22. Rosenfield M, Carrel MF. Effect of near-vision addition lenses on the accuracy of the accommodative response. Optometry. 2001; 72:19-24.
23. Jiang BC, Bussa S, Tea YC, Seger K. Optimal dioptric value of near addition lenses intended to slow myopic progression. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:1100-1105.
24. Cheng D, Schmid KL, Woo GC. The effect of positive-lens addition and base-in prism on accommodation accuracy and near horizontal phoria in Chinese myopic children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008;28:225-237.
25. Sreenivasan V, Irving EL, Bobier WR. Binocular adaptation to [1]2 D lenses in myopic and emmetropic children. Optom Vis Sci. 2009; 86:731-740.
26. Gwiazda J, Thorn F, Held R. Accommodation, accommodative convergence, and response AC/A ratios before and at the onset of myopia in children. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:273-278.
27. Weizhong L, Zhikuan Y, Wen L, Xiang C, Jian G. A longitudinal study on the relationship between myopia development and near accommodation lag in myopic children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008;28:57-61.
28. Berntsen DA, Mutti DO, Zadnik K. Study of theories about myopia progression (STAMP) design and baseline data. Optom Vis Sci. 2010 Oct 7. [Epub ahead of print].
29. Rainey BB, Schroeder TL, Goss DA, Grosvenor TP. Inter-examiner repeatability of heterophoria tests. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75:719-726.
30. Hayter AJ. A proof of the conjecture that the Tukey-Kramer method is conservative. Ann Stat. 1984;12:61-75.
31. Hayter AJ. Pairwise comparisons of generally correlated means. J Am Stat Assoc. 1989;84:208-213.
32. Ibi K. Characteristics of dynamic accommodation responses: comparison between the dominant and non-dominant eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1997;17:44-54.
33. Seidel D, Gray LS, Heron G. The effect of monocular and binocular viewing on the accommodation response to real targets in emmetropia and myopia. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:279-285.
34. Fulk GW, Cyert LA, Parker DE. A randomized clinical trial of bifocal glasses for myopic children with esophoria: results after 54 months. Optometry. 2002;73:470-476.
35. Goss DA, Jackson TW. Clinical findings before the onset of myopia in youth: 3. Heterophoria. Optom Vis Sci. 1996;73:269-278.
36. Goss DA. Variables related to the rate of childhood myopia progression. Optom Vis Sci. 1990;67:631-636.
37. Stark LR, Atchison DA. Subject instructions and methods of target presentation in accommodation research. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:528-537.
38. Chen AH, O'Leary DJ. Free-space accommodative response and minus lens-induced accommodative response in pre-school children. Optometry. 2000;71:454-458.
39. Anderson HA, Glasser A, Stuebing KK, Manny RE. Minus lens stimulated accommodative lag as a function of age. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86:685-694.
40. Smith EL 3rd, Hung LF, Huang J. Relative peripheral hyperopic defocus alters central refractive development in infant monkeys. Vision Res. 2009;49:2386-2392.