Inter-examiner repeatability of heterophoria tests

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 75, Issue 10, 1998, Pages 719-726

  Rainey, Bill B ^a   Schroeder, Tracy L ^a   Goss, David A ^a   Grosvenor, Theodore P ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical tests; Heterophoria; Phoria; Repeatability

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; OPTICAL TESTING; VISION;

CLINICAL TESTS; HETEROPHORIA TESTS; INTER EXAMINER REPEATABILITY;

OPHTHALMOLOGY;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE AXIS LENGTH; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OPTOMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRISM; REPRODUCIBILITY; VISION TEST; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 0032192282     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199810000-00016     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Grosvenor TP. Primary Care Optometry. 2nd ed. New York: Professional Press Books, 1989:101-2.
2. Griffin JR. Binocular Anomalies: Procedures for Vision Therapy. 2nd ed. Chicago: Professional Press, 1982:140-7.
3. Goss DA. Ocular Accommodation, Convergence and Fixation Disparity: A Manual of Clinical Analysis. 2nd ed. Boston: Butter-worth-Heinemann, 1995:11-2, 70.
4. Schroeder TL, Rainey BB, Goss DA, Grosvenor TP. Reliability of and comparisons among methods of measuring dissociated phoria. Optom Vis Sci 1996;73:389-97.
5. Scobee RG, Green EL. Tests for heterophoria - reliability of tests, comparisons between tests, and effect of changing testing conditions. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1947;51:179-97.
6. Hirsch MJ, Bing LB. The effect of testing method on values obtained for phoria at forty centimeters. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1948;25:407-16.
7. Doherty BA, Geraci MJ. Comparative phoric measurements. Optom Wkly 1954;45:1479-81.
8. Morgan MW. The reliability of clinical measurements with special reference to distance heterophoria. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1955;32:167-79.
9. Hirsch MJ. Clinical investigation of a method of testing phoria at forty centimeters. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1948;25:492-5.
10. Daum KM. Analysis of seven methods of measuring the angle of deviation. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1983;60:46-51.
11. Weymouth FW. An experimental comparison of three common methods of measuring heterophoria. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1963;40:497-503.
12. Thompson JT, Guyton DL. Ophthalmic prisms. Measurement errors and how to minimize them. Ophthalmology (Rochester) 1983;90:204-10.
13. Friedman GD. Primer of Epidemiology. 3rd ed. New York:McGraw-Hill, 1987:26-33.
14. Hays WL. Statistics. 4th ed. Chicago: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1988:544-607.
15. Rainey BB, Schroeder TL, Goss DA, Grosvenor TP. Clinical Research Note: Reliability of and comparisons among three variations of the alternating cover test. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1998;18:430-7.
16. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
17. Ludvigh E. Amount of eye movement objectively perceptible to the unaided eye. Am J Ophthalmol 1949;32:649-50.
18. Romano PE, von Noorden GK. Limitations of cover test in detecting strabismus. Am J Ophthalmol 1971;72:10-2.
19. Burian HM. Burian-von Noorden's Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility: Theory and Management of Strabismus. St Louis: Mosby, 1980:182-8.