Near vision, lags of accommodation and myopia

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 126-133

  Charman, W N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ARTICLE; DIFFRACTION; HUMAN; MODEL; MYOPIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA IMAGE; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL ADAPTATION;

EID: 0033061249     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.1999.00414.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Abbott M. L., Schmid K. L., Strang N. C. Differences in the accommodation stimulus response curves of adult myopes and emmetropes. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 18:1998;13-20.
2. Atchison D. A., Collins M. J., Wildsoet C. F., Christensen J., Waterworth M. D. Measurement of monochromatic ocular aberrations of human eyes as a function of accommodation by the Howland aberroscope technique. Vision Res. 35:1995;313-323.
3. Bartmann M., Schaeffel F. A simple mechanism for emmetropisation without cues from accommodation or colour. Vision Res. 34:1994;873-876.
4. Bennett, A. G. and Rabbetts, R. B. (1984). Clinical Visual Optics, 1st edn, Butterworths, London, pp. 67-68.
5. Campbell F. W., Green D. G. Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. J. Physiol. (London). 181:1965;576-593.
6. Charman W. N. Static accommodation and the minimum angle of resolution. Am. J. Physiol. Opt. 63:1986;915-921.
7. Charman, W. N. (1995). Optics of the eye. ed. M. Bass, E. W. Van Stryland, D. R. Williams and W. L. Wolfe. In: Handbook of Optics, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 24.3 - 24.54.
8. Charman W. N., Jennings J. A. M. The optical quality of the monochromatic retinal image as a function of focus. Brit. J. Physiol. Opt. 31:1976;119-134.
9. Ciuffreda, K. J. (1991). Accommodation and its anomalies. ed. W. N. Charman. In: Vision and Visual Dysfunction, vol 1: Visual Optics and Instrumentation, Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 231 - 279.
10. Emsley, H. H. (1963). Visual Optics, 3rd edn, Hatton Press, London, pp. 358-0361.
11. Fry, G. A. (1970). The optical performance of the human eye. ed. E. Wolf. In: Progress in Optics, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 53-131.
12. Ginsburg, A. P. (1978). Visual Information Processing Based on Spatial Filters Constrained by Biological Data. Vols I and II. PhD Thesis. Cambridge University, in Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory Report AMRL-TR-78-129, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH.
13. Goss D. A., Wickham M. G. Retinal-image mediated ocular growth as a mechanism for juvenile onset myopia and for emmetropization. Doc. Ophthalmol. 90:1995;341-375.
14. Goss D. A., Zhai H. Clinical and laboratory investigation of the relationship of accommodation and convergence function with refractive error. Doc. Ophthalmol. 86:1994;349-380.
15. Gwiazda J., Thorn F., Bauer J., Held R. Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 34:1993;690-694.
16. Gwiazda J., Thorn F., Bauer J., Held R. A dynamic relationship between myopia and blur-driven accommodation in school-aged children. Vision Res. 35:1995;1299-1304.
17. Heron G., Furby H. P., Walker R. J., Lane C. S., Judge O. J. E. Relationship between visual acuity and observation distance. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 15:1995;23-30.
18. Hopkins H. H. Geometrical optical treatment of frequency response. Proc. Phys. Soc. (B). 70:1957;1162-1172.
19. Ivanoff A. About the spherical aberration of the eye. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 46:1956;901-903.
20. Jenkins T. C. A. Aberrations of the human eye and their effects on vision: Part 1. Br. J. Physiol. Opt. 20:1963;59-91.
21. Johnson C. A. Effects of luminance and stimulus distance on accommodation and visual resolution. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66:1976;138-142.
22. Jones R. Accommodation and convergence control system parameters are abnormal in myopia. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. (Suppl.). 31:1990;81.
23. Legge G. E., Pelli D. G., Rubin G. S., Schleske M. M. Psychophysics of reading-I. Normal vision. Vision Res. 25:1985;239-252.
24. Le Grand Y. Sur la mesure de l'acuité visuelle au moyen des franges d'interferences. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris. 200:1936;490-491.
25. Leibowitz H. W., Owens D. A. New evidence for the intermediate position of relaxed accommodation. Doc. Ophthalmol. 46:1978;1121-1128.
26. Levi, L. (1974). Handbook of Tables of Functions for Applied Optics, CRC Press, Cleveland Ohio, pp. 508-593.
27. Liang J., Williams D. R. Aberrations and retinal image quality of the normal human eye. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 14:1997;2873-2883.
28. Marg E., Morgan M. W. Further investigations into the pupillary near reflex. The effect of accommodation, fusional convergence and the proximity factor on pupillary diameter. Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom. 27:1950;217-225.
29. McBrien N., Millodot M. The relationship between tonic accommodation and refractive error. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 28:1987;997-1004.
30. Phillips N. J., Winn B., Gilmartin B. Absence of pupil response to blur-driven accommodation. Vision Res. 32:1992;1775-1779.
31. Schaeffel F., Howland H. C. Mathematical model of emmetropization in the chicken. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 5:1988;2080-2086.
32. Sorsby, A., Benjamin, B., Davey, J. B., Sheridan, M. and Tanner, J. M. (1957). Emmetropia and its Aberrations. Medical Research Council Special Report Series No. 293. HMSO, London.
33. Smith G. Ocular defocus, spurious resolution and contrast reversal Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 2:1982;5-23.
34. Stakenburg M. Accommodation without pupillary constriction. Vision Res. 31:1991;267-273.
35. Stenstrom S. Untersuchungen über die Variationen und Kovariation der optischen Elements des menschlichen Auges. Acta Ophthalmol. Kbh. suppl. 26:1946.
36. Takagi M., Abe H., Toda H., Usui T. Accommodative and pupillary responses to sinusoidal target depth movement. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 13:1993;253-257.
37. Williams D. R. Visibility of interference fringes near the resolution limit. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 2:1985;1087-1093.