Effect of progressive addition lenses on myopia progression in Japanese children: A prospective, randomized, double-masked, crossover trial

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 49, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 2781-2789

  Hasebe, Satoshi ^a   Ohtsuki, Hiroshi ^a   Nonaka, Takafumi ^a   Nakatsuka, Chiaki ^a   Miyata, Manabu ^a   Hamasaki, Ichiro ^a   Kimura, Shuhei ^a  

^a OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DISEASE COURSE; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ETHNIC DIFFERENCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JAPANESE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOPIA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGRESSIVE ADDITION LENS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REFRACTION ERROR; SCHOOL CHILD; SINGLE VISION LENS; TREATMENT DURATION; UNITED STATES; ASIAN; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; ETHNOLOGY; EYE REFRACTION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SPECTACLES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; CHILD; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DISEASE PROGRESSION; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EYEGLASSES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MYOPIA; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFRACTION, OCULAR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 48249125768     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.07-0385     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Yen MY, Liu JH, Kao SC, et al. Comparison of the effect of atropine and cyclopentolate on myopia. Ann Ophthalmol. 1989;21:180-187.
2. Shih YF, Chen CH, Chou AC, et al. Effects of different concentrations of atropine on controlling myopia in myopic children. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 1999;15:85-90. (Pubitemid 29072597)
3. Siatkowski RM, Cotter S, Miller JM, et al. Safety and efficacy of 2% pirenzepine ophthalmic gel in children with myopia: a-1year, multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled parallel study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1667-1674. (Pubitemid 39473412)
4. Tan DT, Lam DS, Chua WH, et al. One-year multicenter, doublemasked, placebo-controlled, parallel safety and efficacy study of 2% pirenzepine ophthalmic gel in children with myopia. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:84-91. (Pubitemid 40075324)
5. Leung JTM, Brown B. Progression of myopia in Hong Kong Chinese schoolchildren is slowed by progressive lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:346-354. (Pubitemid 29309758)
6. Edwards MH, Li RW, Lam CS, Lew JK, Yu BS. The Hong Kong progressive lens myopia control study: study design and main outcome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:2852-2858. (Pubitemid 34977032)
7. Hyman L, Gwiazda J, Marsh-Tootle WL, Norton TT, Hussein M, COMET Group. The correction of myopia evaluation trial (COMET): design and general baseline characteristics. Control Clin Trials. 2001;22:573-592. (Pubitemid 32907440)
8. Gwiazda J, Marsh-Tootle WL, Hyman L, Hussein M, Norton TT and the COMET Study Group. Baseline refractive and ocular component measures of children enrolled in the correction of myopia evaluation trial (COMET). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:314-321. (Pubitemid 34113210)
9. Gwiazda J, Hyman L, Hussein M, et al. A randomized clinical trial of progressive addition lenses versus single vision lenses on the progression of myopia in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:1492-1500. (Pubitemid 36378573)
10. Gwiazda JE, Hyman L, Norton RR, et al. Accommodation and risk factors associated with myopia progression and their interaction with treatment in COMET children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2143-2151. (Pubitemid 38902582)
11. Kowalski PM, Wang Y, Owens RE, Bolden J, Smith JB, Hyman L. Adaptability of myopic children to progressive addition lenses with a modified fitting protocol in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET). Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:328-337. (Pubitemid 40546190)
12. Smith EL, Hung LF. The role of optical defocus in regulating refractive development in infant monkeys. Vision Res. 1999;39:1415-1435. (Pubitemid 29090606)
13. Gwiazda J, Thorn F, Bauer J, Held R. Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:690-694. (Pubitemid 23095224)
14. Gwiazda J, Thorn F, Held R. Accommodation, accommodative convergence, and response AC/A ratios before and after the onset of myopia in children. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:273-278. (Pubitemid 40546184)
15. Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Hayes JR, et al. and the CLEERE Study Group. Accommodative lag before and after the onset of myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:837-846.
16. Watanabe S, Yamashita T, Ohba N. A longitudinal study of cycloplegic refraction in a cohort of 350 Japanese schoolchildren. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1999;19:22-29. (Pubitemid 28537654)
17. Shimizu N, Nomura H, Ando F, et al. Refractive errors and factors associated with myopia in an adult Japanese population. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2003;47:6-12. (Pubitemid 36173864)
18. Iwase A, Araie M, Tomidokoro A, et al. Prevalence and causes of low vision and blindness in a Japanese adult population. The Tajimi study. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1354-1362. (Pubitemid 44164341)
19. Goss DA. Effect of bifocal lenses on rate of childhood myopia progression. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1986;63:135-141. (Pubitemid 16128464)
20. Hasebe S, Nonaka F, Nakatsuka C, Ohtsuki H. Myopia control trial with progressive addition lenses in Japanese schoolchildren: baseline measures of refraction, accommodation and heterophoria. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2005;49:23-30. (Pubitemid 40248996)
21. Miles PW. A study of heterophoria and myopia in children, some of whom wore bifocal lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 1962;54:111-114.
22. Bedrossian RH. The effect of atropine on myopia. Ophthalmology. 1979;86:713-717. (Pubitemid 10167502)
23. Zadnik K, Satariano WA, Mutti DO, Scholtz RI, Adams AJ. The effect of parental history of myopia on children's eye size. JAMA. 1994;2711:1323-1327. (Pubitemid 24132457)
24. Pacella R, Mclellan J, Grice K, Del Bono EA, Wiggs JL, Gwiazda JE. Role of genetic factors in the etiology of juvenile-onset myopia based on a longitudinal study of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:381-386. (Pubitemid 29309762)
25. Saw SM, Shankar A, Tan SB, et al. A cohort study of incident myopia in Singaporean children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:1839-1844. (Pubitemid 46768262)
26. Senn S. Cross-over Trials in Clinical Research. 2nd ed. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2002;261-294.
27. Tokoro T, Kabe S. Treatment of the myopia and the changes in optical components. Report 2. Full- or under-correction of myopia by glasses. Acta Soc Ophthalmol Jpn. 1965;69:140-144.
28. Hasebe S, Nakatsuka C, Hamasaki I, Ohtsuki H. Downward deviation of progressive addition lenses in a myopia control trial. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005;25:310-314. (Pubitemid 41702424)
29. Manny RE, Hussein M, Scheiman M, et al. Tropicamide, 1% is an effective cycloplegic agent for myopic children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1728-1735. (Pubitemid 32652346)
30. Hamasaki I, Hasebe S, Ohtsuki H. Cycloplegic effect of 0.5% tropicamide and 0.5% phenylephrine mixed eye drops: objective assessment in Japanese schoolchildren with myopia. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2007;51:111-115. (Pubitemid 46536749)
31. Salmon TO, West RW, Gasser W, Kenmore T. Measurement of refractive errors in young myopes using the COAS Shack-Hartmann aberrometer. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:6-14. (Pubitemid 36106062)
32. Thibos LN, Wheeler W, Horner D. Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical of the refractive error. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74:367-375. (Pubitemid 27310328)
33. Hussin HM, Spry PG, Majid MA, Gouws P. Reliability and validity of the partial coherence interferometry for measurement of ocular axial length in children. Eye. 2005;12:1-4.
34. Nakatsuka C, Hasebe S, Nonaka F, Ohtsuki H. Accommodative lag under habitual seeing conditions: comparison between myopic and emmetropic children. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2005;49:189-194. (Pubitemid 40880058)
35. Kimura S, Hasebe S, Ohtsuki H. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): Measurement of accommodative lags through spectacle lenses is valid? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007;27:281-286. (Pubitemid 46683899)
36. Suemaru J, Hasebe S, Ohtsuki H. Questionnaire survey of spectacle wearability, safety and compliance in myopic children: progressive addition lenses versus single focus lenses. Acta Med Okayama. 2008;62:109-117.
37. Armitage P, Hills M. The two-period crossover trial. Statistician. 1982;31:119-131.
38. Seidemann A, Schaeffel F, Guirao A, et al. Peripheral refractive errors in myopic emmetropic and hyperopic young subjects. J Opt Soc Am A. 2002;19:2363-2373.
39. Atchison DA, Pritchard N, Schmid KL, et al. Shape of the retinal surface in emmetropia and myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:2698-2707. (Pubitemid 43086689)
40. Hazel CA, Cox MJ, Strang NC. Wavefront aberration and its relationship to the accommodative stimulus-response function in myopic subjects. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:151-158. (Pubitemid 36222889)
41. Plainis S, Ginis HS, Pollikaris A. The effect of ocular aberrations on steady-state errors of accommodative response. J Vision. 2006;5:466-477.
42. Rosenfield M, Carrel MF. Effect of near-vision addition lenses on the accuracy of the accommodative response. Optometry. 2001;72:19-24. (Pubitemid 33595161)
43. Jiang BC, Tea YC, O'Donnel D. Changes in accommodative and vergence responses when viewing through near addition lenses. Optometry. 2007;78:129-134.
44. Chung K, Mohidin N, O'Leary DJ. Undercorrection of myopia enhances rather than inhibits myopia progression. Vision Res. 2002;42:2555-2559. (Pubitemid 35346360)
45. Wallman J, Wildsoet C, Xu A, et al. Moving the retina: choroidal modulation of refractive state. Vision Res. 1995;35:37-50. (Pubitemid 24347219)
46. Wildsoet C, Wallman J. Choroidal and scleral mechanisms of compensation for spectacle lenses in chicks. Vision Res. 1995;35:1175-1194.
47. Zhu X, Park TW, Winawer J, Wallman J. In a matter of minutes, the eye can know which way to grow. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:2238-2241. (Pubitemid 43119464)
48. Marzani D, Wallman J. Differences in time course and visual requirements of ocular responses to lenses and diffusers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:575-583. (Pubitemid 32206894)
49. McBrien NA, Metlapally R, Joblinq AI, Gentle A. Expression of collagen-binding integrin receptors in the mammalian sclera and their regulation during the development of myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:4674-4682. (Pubitemid 46586361)
50. Saw AM, Tong L, Chua WH, et al. Incidence and progression of myopia in Singaporean school children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:51-57. (Pubitemid 40041178)
51. Fulk GW, Cyert LA, Parker DE. A randomized trial of the effect of the single vision vs. bifocal lenses on myopia progression in children with esophoria. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77:395-401. (Pubitemid 30656134)
52. Ramsdale C, Charmann WN. Accommodation and convergence: effects of lenses and prisms in closed-loop conditions. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1988;8:43-52.
53. Goss DA, Rainey BB. Relationship of accommodative response and near phoria in a sample of myopia children. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:292-294. (Pubitemid 29258938)
54. Schor C. The influence of interactions between accommodation and convergence on the lag of accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1999;19:134-150. (Pubitemid 29112796)
55. Lam CS, Edwards M, Millodot M, et al. A 2-year longitudinal study of myopia progression and optical component changes among Hong Kong schoolchildren. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:370-380. (Pubitemid 29309761)