The effect of monocular and binocular viewing on the accommodation response to real targets in emmetropia and myopia

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 82, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 279-285

  Seidel, Dirk ^a   Gray, Lyle S ^a   Heron, Gordon ^a  

^a GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accommodation; Blur; Microfluctuations; Myopia

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; DISEASES; OPTICAL DEVICES; PATIENT TREATMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

BINOCULAR VIEWING; LATE-ONSET MYOPES (LOM); MYOPIA; MYOPIGENESIS;

BINOCULAR VISION;

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BINOCULAR VISION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; HUMAN; MONOCULAR VISION; MYOPIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUPIL; RESPONSE TIME; STEADY STATE; STIMULUS;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADULT; AGE OF ONSET; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CONVERGENCE, OCULAR; CUES; HUMANS; MYOPIA; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 17444386728     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.OPX.0000159369.85285.21     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Goldschmidt E. The mystery of myopia. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2003;81:431-6.
2. Grosvenor TP, Goss DA. Clinical Management of Myopia. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1999.
3. Goldschmidt E. [On the etiology of myopia. An epidemiological study.] Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1968;1(suppl):11-172.
4. Adams DW, McBrien NA. Prevalence of myopia and myopic progression in a population of clinical microscopists. Optom Vis Sci 1992;69:467-73.
5. Charman WN. Near vision, lags of accommodation and myopia. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1999;19:126-33.
6. Hung GK, Ciuffreda KJ. A unifying theory of refractive error development. Bull Math Biol 2000;62:1087-108.
7. Bullimore MA, Gilmartin B, Royston JM. Steady-state accommodation and ocular biometry in late-onset myopia. Doc Ophthalmol 1992;80:143-55.
8. Abbott ML, Schmid KL, Strang NC. Differences in the accommodation stimulus response curves of adult myopes and emmetropes. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1998;18:13-20.
9. Ebenholtz SM, Zander PA. Accommodative hysteresis: influence on closed loop measures of far point and near point. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987;28:1246-9.
10. Gwiazda J, Thorn F, Bauer J, Held R. Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:690-4.
11. McBrien NA, Millodot M. The effect of refractive error on the accommodative response gradient. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1986;6:145-9.
12. Rosenfield M, Gilmartin B. Effect of target proximity on the open-loop accommodative response. Optom Vis Sci 1990;67:74-9.
13. Schaeffel F, Weiss S, Seidel J. How good is the match between the plane of the text and the plane of focus during reading? Ophthal Physiol Opt 1999;19:180-92.
14. Culhane HM, Winn B. Dynamic accommodation and myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:1968-74.
15. Seidel D, Gray LS, Heron G. Retinotopic accommodation responses in myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:1035-41.
16. Rosenfield M, Abraham-Cohen JA. Blur sensitivity in myopes. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:303-7.
17. Gray LS, Winn B, Gilmartin B. Accommodative microfluctuations and pupil diameter. Vision Res 1993;33:2083-90.
18. Wolffsohn JS, Gilmartin B, Thomas R, Mallen EA. Refractive error, cognitive demand and nearwork-induced transient myopia. Curr Eye Res 2003;27:363-70.
19. Junghans B, Kiely PM, Crewther DP, Crewther SG. Referral rates for a functional vision screening among a large cosmopolitan sample of Australian children. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2002;22:10-25.
20. McBrien NA, Millodot M. Clinical evaluation of the Canon Autoref R-1. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1985;62:786-92.
21. Pugh JR, Winn B. Modification of the Canon Auto Ref R1 for use as a continuously recording infra-red optometer. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1988;8:460-4.
22. Pugh JR, Winn B. A procedural guide to the modification of a Canon AutoRef R-1 for use as a continuously recording optometer. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1989;9:451-4.
23. Gray LS, Winn B, Gilmartin B, Eadie AS. Objective concurrent measures of open-loop accommodation and vergence under photopic conditions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:2996-3003.
24. Chauhan K, Charman WN. Single figure indices for the steady-state accommodative response. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1995;15:217-21.
25. Pugh JR, Eadie AS, Winn B, Heron G. Power spectrum analysis in the study of ocular mechanisms. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1987;7:321-4.
26. Schor CM, Alexander J, Cormack L, Stevenson S. Negative feedback control model of proximal convergence and accommodation. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1992;12:307-18.
27. Charman WN. Retinal image in the human eye. Progr Ret Res 1983;2:1-50.
28. Rosenfield M, Desai R, Portello JK. Do progressing myopes show reduced accommodative responses? Optom Vis Sci 2002;79:268-73.
29. Goss DA, Rainey BB. Relationship of accommodative response and nearpoint phoria in a sample of myopic children. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:292-4.
30. Goss DA, Wolter KL. Nearpoint phoria changes associated with the cessation of childhood myopia progression. J Am Optom Assoc 1999;70:764-8.
31. Pointer JS, Gilmartin B. Clinical characteristics of unilateral myopic anisometropia in a juvenile optometric practice population. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2004;24:458-63.
32. Charman WN. Aniso-accommodation as a possible factor in myopia development. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2004;24:471-9.
33. Charman WN, Heron G. Fluctuations in accommodation: a review. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1988;8:153-64.
34. Gray LS, Winn B, Gilmartin B. Microfluctuations of accommodation below 0.6 Hz are likely to contribute to the maintenance of sustained accommodation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34(suppl):1307.
35. Winn B. Accommodative microfluctuations: a mechanism for steady-state control of accommodation. In: Franzen O, Richter H, Stark L, eds. Accommodation and Vergence Mechanisms in the Visual System. Boston: Birkhauser Verlag, 2000:129-40.
36. Campbell FW, Robson JG, Westheimer G. Fluctuations of accommodation under steady viewing conditions. J Physiol 1959;145:579-94.
37. Gray LS, Winn B, Gilmartin B. Effect of target luminance on microfluctuations of accommodation. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1993;13:258-65.
38. Udlam WM, Wittenberg S, Giglio EJ, Rosenberg R. Accommodative responses to small changes in dioptric stimulus. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1968;45:483-506.
39. Kotulak JC, Schor CM. The accommodative response to subthreshold blur and to perceptual fading during the Troxler phenomenon. Perception 1986;15:7-15.
40. Schmid KL, Robert Iskander D, Li RW, Edwards MH, Lew JK. Blur detection thresholds in childhood myopia: single and dual target presentation. Vision Res 2002;42:239-47.
41. Vera-Diaz FA, Strang NC, Winn B. Nearwork induced transient myopia during myopia progression. Curr Eye Res 2002;24:289-95.
42. Mutti DO, Jones LA, Moeschberger ML, Zadnik K. AC/A ratio, age, and refractive error in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:2469-78.
43. Ciuffreda KJ, Wallis DM. Myopes show increased susceptibility to nearwork aftereffects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998;39:1797-803.
44. Ciuffreda KJ, Lee M. Differential refractive susceptibility to sustained nearwork. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2002;22:372-9.
45. Heron G, Charman WN, Schor C. Dynamics of the accommodation response to abrupt changes in target vergence as a function of age. Vision Res 2001;41:507-19.
46. Baker FJ, Gilmartin B. The effect of incipient presbyopia on the correspondence between accommodation and vergence. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002;240:488-94.
47. Rosenfield M, Gilmartin B. Accommodative error, adaptation and myopia. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1999;19:159-64.
48. Yamada T, Ukai K. Amount of defocus is not used as an error signal in the control system of accommodation dynamics. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1997;17:55-60.
49. Heron G, Winn B. Binocular accommodation reaction and response times for normal observers. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1989;9:176-83.