An evaluation of the lag of accommodation using photorefraction

Vision Research

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 419-430

  Seidemann, Anne ^a   Schaeffel, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Lag of accommodation; Myopia; Near work; Photorefraction

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ACCURACY; ADULT; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CALIBRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFRACTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; EYE; HUMAN; INFRARED RADIATION; LIGHT REFRACTION; MONOCULAR VISION; MYOPIA; NORMAL HUMAN; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; RETINA IMAGE; SIMULATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; HUMANS; MYOPIA; READING; REFRACTION, OCULAR; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 0037302638     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00571-0     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abbott M.L., Schmid K.L., Strang N.C. Differences in the accommodation stimulus response curves of adult myopes and emmetropes. Ophthalmic and Physiologcial Optics. 18:1998;13-20.
2. Akutsu H., Bedell H., Patel S.S. Recognition thresholds for letters with simulated dioptric blur. Optometry and Vision Science. 77:2000;524-530.
3. Atchison D.A., Collins M.J., Wildsoet C.F., Christensen J., Waterworth M.D. Measurement of the monocular ocular aberrations of human eyes as a function of accommodation by the Howland aberroscope. Vision Research. 35:1995;313-323.
4. Bobier W.R., Suryakumar R., Macham C. Reducing differences between wet and dry refractions of pre-school children. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 42(Suppl.):2001;2110. (ARVO abstract).
5. Campbell F.W., Gubisch R.W. Optical quality of the human eye. Journal of Physiology (London). 186:1966;558-578.
6. Charman W.N. Near Vision, lags of accommodation and myopia. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 19:1999;126-133.
7. Charman W.N. Accommodation and the through-focus changes of the retinal image. Franzen O., Richter H., Stark L. Accommodation and vergence mechanisms of the visual system. 2000;115-127 Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel.
8. Choi M., Weiss S., Schaeffel F., Seidemann A., Howland H.C., Wilhelm B., Wilhelm H. Laboratory, clinical, and kindergarten test of a new eccentric infrared photorefractor (PowerRefractor). Optometry and Vision Science. 77:2000;537-548.
9. Cui C., Campbell M.C.W., Charman W.N., Voisin L. Reducing aberration at the fovea by defocus. Ophthalmic and Visual Optics Technical Digest (OSA, Washington, DC). 3:1993;164-167.
10. Curtin B. The myopias: Basic science and clinical management. 1985;Harper & Row, Philadelphia. pp. 179-182.
11. Fulk G.W., Cyert L.A., Parker D.E. A randomized trial of the effect of single-vision vs. bifocal lenses on myopia progression in children with esophoria. Optometry and Vision Science. 77:2000;395-401.
12. Gekeler F., Schaeffel F., Howland H.C., Wattam-Bell J. Measurement of astigmatism by automated infrared photorefraction. Optometry and Vision Science. 74:1997;472-482.
13. Goss D.A. Effect of spectacle correction on the progression of myopia in children - A literature review. Journal of the American Optometry Association. 65:1994;117-128.
14. Goss D.A. Near work and myopia. The Lancet. 356:2000;1456-1457.
15. Goss D.A., Caffey T.W. Clinical findings before the onset of myopia in youth: 5. Intraocular pressure. Optometry and Vision Science. 76:1999;286-291.
16. Gwiazda J., Thorn F., Bauer J., Held R. Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 34:1993;690-694.
17. Howland H.C., Kelly J.E., Shapiro J. Accommodation of young adults using reading spectacles. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 43(Suppl.):2002;1901. (ARVO abstract).
18. Hepsen I.F., Evereklioglu C., Bayramlar H. The effect of reading and near-work on the development of myopia in emmetropic boys: A prospective, controlled, three-year follow-up study. Vision Research. 41:2001;2511-2520.
19. Kruger P.B., Pola J. Stimuli for accommodation: Blur, chromatic aberration and size. Vision Research. 26:1986;957-971.
20. Leibowitz H.W., Owens D.A. Night myopia and the intermediate dark focus of accommodation. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 65:1975;1121-1128.
21. Leung J., Brown B. Progression of myopia in Hong Kong Chinese schoolchildren is slowed by wearing progressive lenses. Optometry and Vision Science. 76:1999;346-354.
22. McBrien N.A., Millodot M. The effect of refractive error on the accommodation response gradient. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 6:1986;145-149.
23. Mohindra I. A non-cycloplegic refraction technique for infants and young children. Journal of the American Optometry Association. 48:1977;518-523.
24. Mutti D.O., Jones L.A., Mitchell G.L., Moeschberger M.L., Zadnik K. Accommodation lag and refractive error in children. Optometry and Vision Science. 78:2001;238. (abstract).
25. Pärssinen O., Lyyra A.L. Myopia and myopic progression among schoolchildren: A three-year follow-up study. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 34:1993;2794-2802.
26. Roorda A., Campbell M.C., Bobier W.R. Slope-based eccentric photorefraction: Theoretical analysis of different light source configurations and effects of ocular aberrations. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 14:1997;2547-2556.
27. Rosenfield M., Carrel M.F. Effect of near-vision addition lenses on the accuracy of the accommodative response. Optometry. 72:2001;19-24.
28. Saw S.M., Chua W.H., Hong C.Y., Wu H.M., Wai-Ying C., Chia K.S., Stone R., Tan D. Near work in early-onset myopia. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 43:2002;332-339.
29. Seidemann A., Guirao A., Lopez-Gil N., Artal P., Schaeffel F. Peripheral refractive errors in myopic, emmetropic, and hyperopic students. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 19:2002;2363-2373.
30. Seidemann, A., & Schaeffel, F. (2000). How could reading glasses reduce myopia progression in children? In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on myopia, Boston, pp. 259-263.
31. Schaeffel, F. (2002). Optical techniques to measure the dynamics of accommodation. In R. Guthoff, & K. Ludwig (Eds.), Current aspects of human accommodation, part 2. Kaden-Verlag, in press.
32. Schaeffel F., Weiss S., Seidel J. How good is the match between the plane of the text and the plane of focus during reading? Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 19:1999;180-192.
33. Schaeffel F., Wilhelm H., Zrenner E. Inter-individual variability in the dynamics of natural accommodation in humans: Relation to age and refractive error. Journal of Physiology. 461:1993;301-320.
34. Schmid K.L., Abbott M., Humphries M., Pyne K., Wildsoet C.F. Timolol lowers intraocular pressure but does not inhibit the development of experimental myopia in chick. Experimental Eye Research. 70:2000;659-666.
35. Schmid K., Wildsoet C.F. The sensitivity of the chick eye to refractive defocus. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 17:1997;61-67.
36. Schor C., Tsuetaki T.K. Fatigue of accommodation and vergence modifies their mutual interactions. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 28:1987;1250-1259.
37. Shih Y.F., Hsiao C.K., Chen C.J., Chang C.W., Hung P.T., Lin L.K. An intervention trial on efficacy of atropine and multi-focal glasses in controlling myopic progression. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica. 79:2001;233-236.
38. Smith W. Modern optical engineering. 1966;McGraw-Hill, New York. pp. 321.
39. Thorn, F., He, J. C., Thorn, S. J., Held, R., & Gwiazda, J. (2000). The vision of myopic children: How wavefront aberrations alter the retinal image of school book text? In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on myopia, Boston, pp. 127-131.
40. Vilupuru A.S., Glasser A. Dynamic accommodation in rhesus monkeys. Vision Research. 42:2002;125-141.
41. Wallman J. Retinal control of eye growth and refraction. Progress in Retinal Research. 12:1993;134-153.
42. Wallman, J., Winawer, J., Zhu, X., & Park, T.W. (2000). Might myopic defocus prevent myopia? In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on myopia, Boston, pp. 138-142.
43. Wilhelm H., Schaeffel F., Wilhelm B. Age relation of the pupillary near reflex. Klinische Monatsblätter Augenheilkunde. 203:1993;110-116. (in German with English abstract).
44. Zhu X., Winawer J.A., Choi J.W., Wallman J. The effect of defocusing lenses depends on the temporal integration characteristics of the emmetropizing mechanism. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 43(Suppl.):2002;2929. (ARVO abstract).