Free-space accommodative response and minus lens-induced accommodative response in pre-school children

Optometry

Volumn 71, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 454-458

  Chen, Ai Hong ^a   O'Leary, Daniel J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^b ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accommodation; Children's vision; Free space; Lens induced

Indexed keywords

ACCOMMODATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; VISION TEST;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ADULT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; VISION TESTS;

EID: 0000996217     PISSN: 15291839     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Hayes GJ, Cohen BE, Rouse MW, et al. Normative values for the near point of convergence of elementary school children. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:506-12.
2. Chen AH, O'Leary, Howell ER. Near visual function in young children. Part I: Near point of convergence. Part II: Amplitude of accommodation. Part III: Near heterophoria. Ophthalmol Physiol Opt 2000;20:185-98.
3. Lam SR, LaRoche GR, Becker ID, et al. The range and visual ability of ophthalmological parameters in normal children aged 41/2 to 51/2 years. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1996;33:251-6.
4. Morgan MW. The clinical aspects of accommodation and convergence. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1944;21: 301-13.
5. Ramsdale C. The effect of ametropia on the accommodative response. Acta Ophthalmol 1985;63:167-74.
6. McBrien NA, Millodot M. The effect of refractive error on the accommodative response gradient. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1986;6:145-9.
7. Gwiazda J, Thorn F, Bauer J, et al. Myopic children show insufficient accommodative response to blur. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:690-4.
8. Winn B, Pugh JR, Gilmartin B, et al. The effect of pupil size on static and dynamic measurement of accommodation using an infra-red optometer. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1989;9:277-83.
9. Osterberg GA. Danish pictorial sight-test chart. Am J Ophthalmol 1965;59:1120-3.
10. Charman MN, Tucker J. Dependence of accommodation response on the spatial frequency spectrum of the observed object. Vision Res 1977;17:129-39.
11. Nadell MC, Knoll HA. The effect of luminance, target configuration, and lenses upon the refractive state of the eye. Part 1. AmJ Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1956;33: 24-42.
12. Lovasik JV, Kergoat H, Kothe AC. The influence of letter size on the focusing response of the eye. J AM OPTOM ASSOC 1987;58:631-9.
13. Charman WN, Heron G. Fluctuations in accommodation: a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1988;8:153-64.
14. Winn B, Gilmartin B. Current perspective on microfluctuations of accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1992; 12:252-6.
15. Goss DA. Attempts to reduce the rate of increase myopia in young people - a critical literature review. Am J Optom Physiol Optics 1982;59:828-41.