Prediction of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 inhibitor potency using the fragment molecular orbital method

Journal of Cheminformatics

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Mazanetz, Michael P ^a   Ichihara, Osamu ^a   Law, Richard J ^a   Whittaker, Mark ^a  

^a EVOTEC UK LTD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79751471221     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17582946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1758-2946-3-2     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. The Many Roles of Computation in Drug Discovery. WL Jorgensen, Science 2004 303 1813 (Pubitemid 38374866)
2. Lead discovery using molecular docking. BK Shoichet SL McGovern B Wei JJ Irwin, Curr Opin Chem Biol 2002 6 439 446 10.1016/S1367-5931(02)00339-3 12133718 (Pubitemid 34808727)
3. Structure-based virtual screening protocols. A Good, Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 2001 4 301 307 11560062 (Pubitemid 32499900)
4. Evaluation of Docking Performance: Comparative Data on Docking Algorithms. M Kontoyianni LM McClellan GS Sokol, J Med Chem 2004 47 558 565 10.1021/jm0302997 14736237 (Pubitemid 38129714)
5. Detailed Analysis of Scoring Functions for Virtual Screening. M Stahl M Rarey, J Med Chem 2001 44 1035 1042 10.1021/jm0003992 11297450 (Pubitemid 32852130)
6. A Critical Assessment of Docking Programs and Scoring Functions. GL Warren CW Andrews A-M Capelli B Clarke J LaLonde MH Lambert M Lindvall N Nevins SF Semus S Senger,, et al. J Med Chem 2006 49 5912 5931 10.1021/jm050362n 17004707 (Pubitemid 44484938)
7. AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. O Trott AJ Olson, J Comput Chem 2010 31 455 461 19499576
8. Approaches to the Description and Prediction of the Binding Affinity of Small-Molecule Ligands to Macromolecular Receptors. H Gohlke G Klebe, Angew Chem Int Edit 2002 41 2644 2676 10.1002/1521-3773(20020802)41:15<2644::AID- ANIE2644>3.0.CO;2-O
9. Free Energy Via Molecular Simulation: Applications to Chemical and Biomolecular Systems. DL Beveridge FM DiCapua, Annu Rev Biophys Bio 1989 18 431 492 10.1146/annurev.biophys.18.1.431
10. Ligand binding affinity prediction by linear interaction energy methods. T Hansson J Marelius J qvist, J Comput Aided Mol Des 1998 12 27 35 10.1023/A:1007930623000 9570087 (Pubitemid 128513811)
11. Examining Methods for Calculations of Binding Free Energies: LRA, LIE, PDLD-LRA, and PDLD/S-LRA Calculations of Ligands Binding to an HIV Protease. YY Sham Z-T Chu H Tao A Warshel, Proteins: Struct, Funct, Genet 2000 39 393 407 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(20000601)39:4<393::AID-PROT120>3.0.CO;2-H (Pubitemid 30414177)
12. Calculations of antibody-antigen interactions: microscopic and semi-microscopic evaluation of free energies of binding of phosphorylcholine analogs to McPC603. FS Lee Z-T Chu MB Bolger A Warshel, Protein Eng 1992 5 215 228 10.1093/protein/5.3.215 1409541
13. Modeling electrostatic effects in proteins. A Warshel PK Sharma M Kato WA Parson, Biochim Biophys Acta 2006 1764 1647 1676 17049320 (Pubitemid 46070172)
14. Calculating Structures and Free Energies of Complex Molecules:? Combining Molecular Mechanics and Continuum Models. PA Kollman I Massova C Reyes B Kuhn S Huo L Chong M Lee T Lee Y Duan W Wang,, et al. Acc Chem Res 2000 33 889 897 10.1021/ar000033j 11123888 (Pubitemid 32056774)
15. Protein-protein interactions from linear-scaling first-principles quantum-mechanical calculations. DJ Cole C-K Skylaris E Rajendra AR Venkitaraman MC Payne, EPL 2010 91 37004 10.1209/0295-5075/91/37004
16. Validation and Use of the MM-PBSA Approach for Drug Discovery. B Kuhn P Gerber T Schulz-Gasch M Stahl, J Med Chem 2005 48 4040 4048 10.1021/jm049081q 15943477 (Pubitemid 40800612)
17. Fast and accurate predictions of binding free energies using MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA. G Rastelli AD Rio G Degliesposti M Sgobba, J Comput Chem 2010 31 797 810 19569205
18. A Multistep Approach to Structure-Based Drug Design:? Studying Ligand Binding at the Human Neutrophil Elastase. T Steinbrecher DA Case A Labahn, J Med Chem 2006 49 1837 1844 10.1021/jm0505720 16539369
19. Binding of a Diverse Set of Ligands to Avidin and Streptavidin: An Accurate Quantitative Prediction of Their Relative Affinities by a Combination of Molecular Mechanics and Continuum Solvent Models. B Kuhn PA Kollman, J Med Chem 2000 43 3786 3791 10.1021/jm000241h 11020294
20. Are Free Energy Calculations Useful in Practice? A Comparison with Rapid Scoring Functions for the p38 MAP Kinase Protein System. DA Pearlman PS Charifson, J Med Chem 2001 44 3417 3423 10.1021/jm0100279 11585447 (Pubitemid 32947908)
21. Cation-pi interactions in aromatics of biological and medicinal interest: electrostatic potential surfaces as a useful qualitative guide. P Mecozzi AP West Jr DA Dougherty, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996 93 10566 10571 10.1073/pnas.93.20.10566 8855218 (Pubitemid 26333027)
22. Cation- interactions in structural biology. JP Gallivan DA Dougherty, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999 96 9459 9464 10.1073/pnas.96.17.9459 10449714
23. Origin of the Attraction and Directionality of the NH/p Interaction:? Comparison with OH/p and CH/p Interactions. S Tsuzuki K Honda T Uchimaru M Mikami K Tanabe, J Am Chem Soc 2000 122 11450 11458 10.1021/ja001901a
24. Cl- Interactions in Protein-Ligand Complexes. YN Imai Y Inoue I Nakanishi K Kitaura, QSAR & Comb Sci 2009 28 869 873
25. On the Nature of Bonding in Lone Pairp-Electron Complexes: CCSD(T)/Complete Basis Set Limit Calculations. J Ran P Hobza, J Chem Theory Comput 2009 5 1180 1185 10.1021/ct900036y
26. Quantum Chemical Benchmark Energy and Geometry Database for Molecular Clusters and Complex Molecular Systems: A Users Manual and Examples. J Rezc P Jurecka KE Riley J Cern H Valdes K Pluhckov K Berka T Rezc M Pitonk J Vondrek,, et al. Collect Czech Chem Commun 2008 73 1261 1270 http://www.begdb.com
27. The role of quantum mechanics in structure-based drug design. K Raha MB Peters B Wang N Yu AM Wollacott LM Westerhoff KM Merz Jr, Drug Discov Today 2007 12 725 731 10.1016/j.drudis.2007.07.006 17826685 (Pubitemid 47364833)
28. The Role of Polarization and Charge Transfer in the Solvation of Biomolecules. A van der Vaart KM Merz Jr, J Am Chem Soc 1999 121 9182 9190 10.1021/ja9912325 (Pubitemid 29477385)
29. Large-Scale Validation of a Quantum Mechanics Based Scoring Function:? Predicting the Binding Affinity and the Binding Mode of a Diverse Set of Protein-Ligand Complexes. K Raha KM Merz Jr, J Med Chem 2005 48 4558 4575 10.1021/jm048973n 15999994 (Pubitemid 40993417)
30. Fragment molecular orbital method: an approximate computational method for large molecules. K Kitaura E Ikeo T Asada T Nakano M Uebayasi, Chem Phys Lett 1999 313 701 706 10.1016/S0009-2614(99)00874-X (Pubitemid 129556715)
31. Quantum computational analysis for drug resistance of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase to nevirapine through point mutations. X He Y Mei Y Xiang DW Zhang JZH Zhang, Proteins: Struct, Funct, Bioinf 2005 61 423 432 10.1002/prot.20578 (Pubitemid 41430485)
32. The Origin of Hydrogen Bonding. An Energy Decomposition Study. H Umeyama K Morokuma, J Am Chem Soc 1977 99 1316 1332 10.1021/ja00447a007
33. Computation of charge-transfer energies by perturbation theory. AJ Stone, J Chem Phys Lett 1993 211 101 109 10.1016/0009-2614(93)80058-W
34. A general treatment of solvent effects based on screened Coulomb potentials. SA Hassan, J Phys Chem B 2000 104 6478 6489 10.1021/jp993895e
35. Divide and conquer interaction energy decomposition. A van der Vaart KM Merz Jr, J Phys Chem A 1999 103 3321 3329 10.1021/jp9844967
36. Benchmark database of accurate (MP2 and CCSD(T) complete basis set limit) interaction energies of small model complexes, DNA base pairs, and amino acid pairs. P Jurecka J poner J Cern P Hobza, Phys Chem Chem Phys 2006 8 1985 1993 10.1039/b600027d 16633685
37. On the accurate reproduction of ab initio interaction energies between an enzyme and substrate. RPA Bettens AM Lee, Chem Phys Lett 2007 449 341 346 10.1016/j.cplett.2007.10.073 (Pubitemid 350160609)
38. QMQSAR: Utilization of a semiempirical probe potential in a field-based QSAR method. S Dixon KM Merz Jr G Lauri JC Ianni, J Comput Chem 2005 26 23 34 10.1002/jcc.20142 15526326 (Pubitemid 40021620)
39. Semiempirical Comparative Binding Energy Analysis (SE-COMBINE) of a Series of Trypsin Inhibitors. MB Peters KM Merz Jr, J Chem Theory Comput 2006 2 383 399 10.1021/ct050284j
40. Ab initio fragment molecular orbital (FMO) method applied to analysis of the ligand-protein interaction in a pheromone-binding protein. T Nemoto DG Fedorov M Uebayasi K Kanazawa K Kitaura Y Komeiji, Comput Biol Chem 2005 29 434 439 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2005.09.005 16290169 (Pubitemid 41690443)
41. Quantum mechanical map for protein-ligand binding with application to -trypsin/benzamidine complex. DW Zhang Y Xiang AM Gao JZH Zhang, J Chem Phys 2004 120 1145 1148 10.1063/1.1639152 15268233
42. Ligand Affinities Estimated by Quantum Chemical Calculations. P Söderhjelm J Kongsted U Ryde, J Chem Theory Comput 2010 6 1726 1737
43. Comparison of binding affinity evaluations for FKBP ligands with state-of-the-art computational methods: FMO, QM/MM, MM-PB/SA and MP-CAFEE approaches. H Watanabe S Tanaka N Okimoto A Hasegawa M Taiji Y Tanida T Mitsui M Katsuyama H Fujitani, Chem-Bio Informatics Journal 2010 10 32 45 10.1273/cbij.10.32
44. QSAR Study of Cyclic Urea Type HIV-1 PR Inhibitors Using Ab Initio MO Calculation of Their Complex Structures with HIV-1 PR. T Yoshida K Yamagishi H Chuman, QSAR & Comb Sci 2008 27 694 703
45. Novel Quantitative Structure-Activity Studies of HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors of the Cyclic Urea Type Using Descriptors Derived from Molecular Dynamics and Molecular Orbital Calculations. T Yoshida T Fujita H Chuman, Curr Comput Aided Drug Des 2009 5 38 55 10.2174/157340909787580845
46. Correlation analyses on binding affinity of Substituted benzenesulfonamides with carbonic anhydrase using ab initio MO calculations on their Complex structures. T Yoshida Y Munei S Hitaoka H Chuman, J Chem Inf Model 2010 50 850 860 10.1021/ci100068w 20415451
47. Recent Developments in Fragment-Based Drug Discovery. M Congreve G Chessari D Tisi AJ Woodhead, J Med Chem 2008 51 3661 3680 10.1021/jm8000373 18457385 (Pubitemid 351956496)
48. Identification of N-(4-Piperidinyl)-4-(2,6-dichlorobenzoylamino)-1H- pyrazole-3-carboxamide (AT7519), a Novel Cyclin Dependent Kinase Inhibitor Using Fragment-Based X-Ray Crystallography and Structure Based Drug Design PG Wyatt AJ Woodhead V Berdini JA Boulstridge MG Carr DM Cross DJ Davis LA Devine TR Early RE Feltell,, et al. J Med Chem 2008 51 4986 4999 10.1021/jm800382h 18656911
49. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. (v0.99rc6). W DeLano, Palo Alto, CA, USA: DeLano Scientific 2006
50. MOE (The Molecular Operating Environment). (2009.10). 1010 Sherbrooke Street West, Suite 910, Montreal, Canada H3A 2R7, Chemical Computing Group Inc 2009
51. Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: I. Method. A Jakalian BL Bush DB Jack CI Bayly, J Comput Chem 2000 21 132 146 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(20000130)21:2<132::AID-JCC5>3.0.CO;2-P
52. Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation. A Jakalian DB Jack CI Bayly, J Comput Chem 2002 23 1623 1641 10.1002/jcc.10128 12395429 (Pubitemid 35330860)
53. Facio: New Computational Chemistry Environment for PC GAMESS. M Suenaga, J Comput Chem Jpn 2005 4 25 32 10.2477/jccj.4.25
54. Development of GUI for GAMESS/FMO Calculation. M Suenaga, J Comput Chem Jpn 2008 7 33 53 10.2477/jccj.H1920
55. Pair interaction molecular orbital method: an approximate computational method for molecular interactions. K Kitaura T Sawai T Asada T Nakano M Uebayasi, Chem Phys Lett 1999 312 319 324 10.1016/S0009-2614(99)00937-9 (Pubitemid 129556608)
56. Fragment molecular orbital method: application to polypeptides. T Nakano T Kaminuma T Sato Y Akiyama M Uebayasi K Kitaura, Chem Phys Lett 2000 318 614 618 10.1016/S0009-2614(00)00070-1
57. Fragment molecular orbital method: use of approximate electrostatic potential. T Nakano T Kaminuma T Sato K Fukuzawa Y Akiyama M Uebayasi K Kitaura, Chem Phys Lett 2002 351 475 480 10.1016/S0009-2614(01)01416-6
58. General Atomic and Molecular Electronic Structure System. MW Schmidt KK Baldridge JA Boatz ST Elbert MS Gordon JH Jensen S Koseki N Matsunaga KA Nguyen SJ Su,, et al. J Comput Chem 1993 14 1347 1363 10.1002/jcc.540141112
59. General Atomic and Molecular Electronic Structure System. http://www.msg.chem.iastate.edu/GAMESS/GAMESS.html
60. Advances in electronic structure theory: GAMESS a decade later. MS Gordon MW Schmidt, Theory and Applications of Computational Chemistry, the first forty years Amsterdam: Elsevier, Dykstra CE, Frenking G, Kim KS, Scuseria GE, 2005 1167 1189 full-text
61. Visualization analysis of inter-fragment interaction energies of CRP-cAMP-DNA complex based on the fragment molecular orbital method. I Kurisakia K Fukuzawab Y Komeijic Y Mochizukic T Nakanoc J Imadag A Chmielewskig SM Rothsteing H Watanabea S Tanakaa, Biophys Chem 2010 130 1 9 10.1016/j.bpc.2007. 06.011
62. VISCANA: Visualized Cluster Analysis of Protein-Ligand Interaction Based on the ab Initio Fragment Molecular Orbital Method for Virtual Ligand Screening. S Amari M Aizawa J Zhang K Fukuzawa Y Mochizuki Y Iwasawa K Nakata H Chuman T Nakano, J Chem Inf Model 2006 46 221 230 10.1021/ci050262q 16426058 (Pubitemid 43282117)
63. Intra- and intermolecular interactions between cyclic-AMP receptor protein and DNA: Ab initio fragment molecular orbital study. K Fukuzawa Y Komeiji Y Mochizuki A Kato T Nakano S Tanaka, J Comput Chem 2006 27 948 960 10.1002/jcc.20399 16586530 (Pubitemid 43723217)
64. Pair interaction energy decomposition analysis. DG Fedorov K Kitaura, J Comput Chem 2007 28 222 237 10.1002/jcc.20496 17109433 (Pubitemid 46180489)
65. A new energy decomposition scheme for molecular interactions within the Hartree-Fock approximation. K Kitaura K Morokuma, Int J Quantum Chem 1976 10 325 340 10.1002/qua.560100211
66. Can the calculation of ligand binding free energies be improved with continuum solvent electrostatics and an ideal-gas entropy correction? SM Schwarzl TB Tschopp JC Smith S Fischer, J Comput Chem 2002 23 1143 1149 10.1002/jcc.10112 12116383 (Pubitemid 34854445)
67. The consequences of translational and rotational entropy lost by small molecules on binding to proteins. CW Murray ML Verdonk, J Comput Aided Mol Des 2002 16 741 753 10.1023/A:1022446720849 12650591 (Pubitemid 36336183)
68. Contribution of Conformer Focusing to the Uncertainty in Predicting Free Energies for Protein-Ligand Binding. J Tirado-Rives WL Jorgensen, J Med Chem 2006 49 5880 5884 10.1021/jm060763i 17004703 (Pubitemid 44484934)
69. Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes. MD Eldridge CW Murray TR Auton GV Paolini RP Mee, J Comput Aided Mol Des 1997 11 425 445 10.1023/A:1007996124545 9385547 (Pubitemid 127505895)
70. The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure. H-J Böhm, J Comput Aided Mol Des 1994 8 243 256 7964925
71. SMall Molecule Growth 2001 (SMoG2001): An Improved Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein-Ligand Interactions. AV Ishchenko EI Shakhnovich, J Med Chem 2002 45 2770 2780 10.1021/jm0105833 12061879 (Pubitemid 34627647)
72. A Quantum Mechanics-Based Scoring Function:? Study of Zinc Ion-Mediated Ligand Binding. K Raha KM Merz Jr, J Am Chem Soc 2004 126 1020 1021 10.1021/ja038496i 14746460 (Pubitemid 38140722)
73. Mixed Quantum Mechanics/Molecular Mechanics Scoring Function To Predict Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity. SA Hayik R Dunbrack Jr KM Merz Jr, J Chem Theory Comput 2010 6 3079 3091 10.1021/ct100315g 21221417
74. Using a Convenient, Quantitative Model for Torsional Entropy To Establish Qualitative Trends for Molecular Processes That Restrict Conformational Freedom. M Mammen EI Shakhnovich GM Whitesides, J Org Chem 1998 63 3168 3175 10.1021/jo970943n (Pubitemid 128500459)
75. Theory of hydrophobic bonding. II. Correlation of hydrocarbon solubility in water with solvent cavity surface area. RB Hermann, J Phys Chem 1972 76 2754 2759 10.1021/j100663a023
76. Macroscopic models of aqueous solutions: biological and chemical applications. B Honig K Sharp AS Yang, J Phys Chem 1993 97 1101 1109 10.1021/j100108a002
77. SIMCAP (11.0.0.0). Box 7960, SE90719 Umeå, Sweden, Umetrics AB 2005
78. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. S Wold M Sjöström L Eriksson, Chemom Intell Lab Syst 2001 58 109 130 10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00155- 1 (Pubitemid 33033283)
79. Correlation Analyses on Binding Affinity of Sialic Acid Analogues with Influenza Virus Neuraminidase-1 Using ab Initio MO Calculations on Their Complex Structures. S Hitaoka M Harada T Yoshida H Chuman, J Chem Inf Model 2010 50 1796 1805 10.1021/ci100225b 20863103
80. Conformational Analysis of Drug-Like Molecules Bound to Proteins:? An Extensive Study of Ligand Reorganization upon Binding. E Perola PS Charifson, J Med Chem 2004 47 2499 2510 10.1021/jm030563w 15115393 (Pubitemid 38580088)
81. Calculation of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities. MK Gilson H-X Zhou, Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2007 36 21 42 10.1146/annurev.biophys.36.040306. 132550 17201676 (Pubitemid 46998108)
82. A Study of CDK2 Inhibitors Using a Novel 3D-QSAR Method Exploiting Receptor Flexibility. MP Mazanetz IM Withers CA Laughton PM Fischer, QSAR & Comb Sci 2009 28 878 884
83. The effect of MM polarization on the QM/MM transition state stabilization: application to chorismate mutase. CJR Illingworth KE Parkes CR Snell S Marti V Moliner CA Reynolds, Mol Phys 2008 106 1511 1515 10.1080/00268970802077850
84. Compensating Enthalpic and Entropic Changes Hinder Binding Affinity Optimization. V Lafont AA Armstrong H Ohtaka Y Kiso LM Amzel E Freire, Chem Biol Drug Des 2007 69 413 422 10.1111/j.1747-0285.2007.00519.x 17581235 (Pubitemid 46955533)
85. Do enthalpy and entropy distinguish first in class from best in class? E Freire, Drug Discov Today 2008 13 869 874 10.1016/j.drudis.2008.07.005 18703160
86. Ligand configurational entropy and protein binding. CA Chang W Chen MK Gilson, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007 104 1534 1539 10.1073/pnas.0610494104 17242351 (Pubitemid 46214625)
87. The polarizable continuum model (PCM) interfaced with the fragment molecular orbital method (FMO). DG Fedorov K Kitaura H Li JH Jensen MS Gordon, J Comput Chem 2006 27 976 985 10.1002/jcc.20406 16604514 (Pubitemid 43723220)
88. Incorporation of solvation effects into the fragment molecular orbital calculations with the Poisson-Boltzmann equation. H Watanabe Y Okiyama T Nakano S Tanaka, Chem Phys Lett 2010 500 116 119 10.1016/j.cplett.2010.10.017