Application of simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) from viscosity reducing of raw sweet potato for bioethanol production at laboratory, pilot and industrial scales

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 102, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 4573-4579

  Zhang, Liang ^a,b   Zhao, Hai ^a   Gan, Mingzhe ^a   Jin, Yanlin ^a   Gao, Xiaofeng ^a   Chen, Qian ^a,b   Guan, Jiafa ^a   Wang, Zhongyan ^c  

^a CHENGDU INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Bioethanol; Industry scale; Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF); Sweet potato; Viscosity reduction

Indexed keywords

BIO-ETHANOL PRODUCTION; BIOPROCESSES; ECONOMIC STANDPOINTS; ENVIRONMENTALLY-FRIENDLY; ETHANOL CONCENTRATIONS; ETHANOL PRODUCTIVITY; INDUSTRIAL SCALE; INOCULUM SIZE; LABORATORY SCALE; PILOT SCALE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIMULTANEOUS SACCHARIFICATION AND FERMENTATION; SWEET POTATO; VISCOSITY REDUCTION; XYLANASES;

ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; INDUSTRY; LABORATORIES; SACCHARIFICATION; VISCOSITY; YEAST;

BIOETHANOL;

ALCOHOL; CARBON DIOXIDE; NITROGEN; XYLAN ENDO 1,3 BETA XYLOSIDASE;

BIOFUEL; DICOTYLEDON; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; FUNGUS; LABORATORY METHOD; VISCOSITY;

AIR; ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ARTICLE; BIOPROCESS; BIOREACTOR; FERMENTATION; FERMENTATION MODEL; GAS; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; INOCULATION; LABORATORY; NONHUMAN; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTUM YIELD; SACCHARIFICATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SWEET POTATO; VISCOSITY;

BIOFUELS; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY; IPOMOEA BATATAS; LABORATORIES; PILOT PROJECTS; PRESSURE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; VISCOSITY;

IPOMOEA BATATAS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 79551690009     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.115     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Alfani F., Gallifuoco A., Saporosi A., Spera A., Cantarella M. Comparison of SHF and SSF processes for the bioconversion of steam-exploded wheat straw. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000, 25:184-192.
2. Altintas M.M., Ulgen K.O., Kirdar B., Onsan Z.I., Oliver S.G. Optimal substrate feeding policy for fed-batch cultures of S. cerevisiae expressing biofunctional fusion protein displaying amylolytic activities. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2003, 33:262-269.
3. Atthasampunna P., Somchai P., Eur-aree A., Artjariyasripong S. Produce of fuel ethanol from cassava. World J. Microb. Biotechnol. 1987, 3(2):135-142.
4. Breisha G.Z. Production of 16% ethanol from 35% sucrose. Biomass Bioeng. 2010, 34(8):1243-1249.
5. Galbe M., Zacchi G. A review of the production of ethanol from softwood. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 59(6):618-628.
6. Garcia-Gonzalez L., Geeraerd A.H., Elst K., Van Ginneken L., Van Impe J.F., Devlieghere F. Influence of type of microorganism, food ingredients and food properties on high-pressure carbon dioxide inactivation of microorganisms. Int. J. Food Microb. 2009, 129(3):253-263.
7. Ingledew W.M., Thomas K.C., Hynes S.H., McLeod J.G. Viscosity concerns with rye mashes used for ethanol production. Cereal Chem. 1999, 764:59-464.
8. Summary for policymakers. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, IPCC, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, H.L. Miller (Eds.).
9. Karl D.W., Roth K.M., Schendel F.J., Gooch V.D., Jordan B.J. Carbon dioxide effect on fuel alcohol fermentation. Fuel Chem. Biomass 1997, 666:93-109.
10. Laopaiboon L., Nuanpeng S., Srinophakun P., Klanrit P., Laopaiboon P. Ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice using very high gravity technology: effects of carbon and nitrogen supplementations. Bioresour. Biotechnol. 2009, 100(18):4176-4182.
11. Liu Y., Zhao H. Fast production of ethanol by Zymomonas mobilis (Zy-1). Chinese J. Appl. Environ. Biol. 2007, 13:69-72. (In Chinese).
12. Lu G.Q., Huang H.H., Zhang D.P. Application of near-infrared spectroscopy to predict sweet potato starch thermal properties and noodle quality. J. Zhejiang University (Eng. Sci.) 2006, 6(2006):475-481.
13. Soderstrom J., Galbe M., Zacchi G. Separate versus simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of two-step steam pretreated softwood for ethanol production. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 2005, 25(3):187-202.
14. Sohel, M.I., Jack, M.W., 2010. Therrmodynamic analysis of lignocellulosic biofuel production via a biochemical process: guiding technology selection and research focus. Bioresour. Technol., doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.032.
15. Sree N.K., Sridhar M., Rao L.V., Pandey A. Ethanol production in solid substrate fermentation using thermotolerant yeast. Process Biochem. 1999, 34(2):115-119.
16. Srichuwong S., Arakane M., Fujiwara M., Zhang Z., Takahashi H., Tokuyasu K. Alkali-aided enzymatic viscosity reduction of sugar beet mash for novel bioethanol production process. Biomass Bioenergy 2010, 34(9):1336-1341.
17. Srichuwong S., Fujiwara M., Wang X., Seyama T., Shiroma R., Arakane M., Mukojima N., Tokuyasu K. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of very high gravity (VHG) potato mash for the production of ethanol. Biomass Bioenergy 2009, 33(5):890-898.
18. Srikanta S., Jaleel S.A., Ghildyal N.P., Lonsane B.K. Techno-economic feasibility of ethanol production from fresh cassava tubers in comparison to dry cassava chips. Food 2006, 36:253-258.
19. Takashi W., Sathaporn S., Mitsuhiro A., Seiji T., Masaru Y., Itsuki W., Mami Y., Akira A., Ken T., Toshihide N. Selection of stress-tolerant yeasts for simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of very high gravity (VHG) potato mash to ethanol. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101(24):9710-9714.
20. Thibault J., Leduy A., Côté F. Production of ethanol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae under high-pressure conditions. Bioresour. Bioeng. 1987, 30(1):74-80.
21. Turhan I., Bialka K.L., Demirci A., Karhan M. Ethanol production from carob extract by using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101(11):5290-5296.
22. Miller G.L. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal. Chem. 1959, 31:426-428.
23. Montesinos T., Navarro J.M. Production of alcohol from raw wheat flour by amyloglucosidase and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2000, 27(6):363-370.
24. Norton J.S., Krauss R.W. The inhibition of cell division in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Meyen) by carbon dioxide. Plant Cell Physiol. 1972, 13:139-149.
25. Novo, 1981. Novo enzymes in the production of ethanol from starch containing crops, Novo Enzyme Information IB-238c-GB.
26. U.S.D.A, 2008. Agriculture Research Service, Sweet potato out-yields corn in ethanol production study, Available from: [accessed 28.08.2008]. http://www.ars.usda.gov.
27. Wang D., Bean S., McLaren J., Seib P., Madl R., Tuinstra M., Shi Y., Lenz M., Wu X., Zhao R. Grain sorghum is a viable feedstock for ethanol production. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 35:313-320.
28. Wyman C.E. What is (and is not) vital to advancing cellulosic ethanol. Trends Biotechnol. 2007, 25(4):153-157.
29. Zhang L., Chen Q., Jin Y.L., Xue H.L., Guan J.F., Wang Z.Y., Zhao H. Energy-saving direct ethanol production from viscosity reduction mash of sweet potato at very high gravity (VHG). Fuel Process Technol. 2010, 91(12):1845-1850.