Preprocessing and downstream analysis of microarray DNA copy number profiles

Briefings in Bioinformatics

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 10-21

  van de Wiel, Mark A ^a   Picard, Franck ^b,c   van Wieringen, Wessel N ^a   Ylstra, Bauke ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b LABORATOIRE DE BIOMÉTRIE ET BIOLOGIE EVOLUTIVE   (France)

^c BAMBOO ^*  (France)

Author keywords

Aberrations; Array comparative genomic hybridization; Cancer; Data analysis; Preprocessing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; DNA MICROARRAY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; METHODOLOGY;

COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

EID: 79551652532     PISSN: 14675463     EISSN: 14774054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbq004     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, et al. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nature Genetics 1998;20:207-11.
2. Edelmann L, Hirschhorn K. Clinical utility of array CGH for the detection of chromosomal imbalances associated with mental retardation and multiple congenital anomalies. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2009;1151:157-66.
3. Curtis C, Lynch AG, Dunning MJ, et al. The pitfalls of platform comparison: DNA copy number array technologies assessed. BMC Genomics 2009;10:588.
4. Kallioniemi A. CGH microarrays and cancer. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2008;19:36-40.
5. Allison DB, Cui X, Page G, et al. Microarray data analysis: from disarray to consolidation and consensus. Nat Rev Genet 2006;7:55-65.
6. Park PJ. Experimental design and data analysis for array comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Invest 2008;26: 923-28.
7. Marioni JC, Thorne N, Valsesia A, et al. Breaking the waves: improved detection of copy number variation from microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization. Genome Biology 2007;8:R228.
8. Diskin SJ, Li M, Hou C, et al. Adjustment of genomic waves in signal intensities from whole-genome SNP genotyping platforms. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36:e126.
9. Van de Wiel MA, Brosens R, Eilers P, et al. Smoothing waves in array CGH tumor profiles. Bioinformatics 2009;25: 1099-104.
10. Staaf J, Jonsson G, Ringner M, et al. Normalization of array-CGH data: influence of copy number imbalances. BMC Genomics 2007;8:382.
11. Chen HI, Hsu FH, Jiang Y, et al. A probe-density-based analysis method for array CGH data: simulation, normalization and centralization. Bioinformatics 2008;24: 1749-56.
12. Marioni JC, Thorne N, Tavare S. BioHMM: a heterogeneous hidden markov model for segmenting array CGH data. Bioinformatics 2006;22:1144-6.
13. Stjernqvist S, Ryden T, Skold M, et al. Continuous-index hidden Markov modelling of array CGH copy number data. Bioinformatics 2007;23:1006-14.
14. Rueda OM, Díaz-Uriarte R. Flexible and accurate detection of genomic copy-number changes from aCGH. PLOS Computational Biology 2007;3:1115-22.
15. Olshen AB, Venkatraman E, Lucito R, et al. Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data. Biostatistics 2004;5:557-72.
16. Rancoita PM, Hutter M, Bertoni F, et al. Bayesian DNA copy number analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2009;10:1-19.
17. Huang J, Gusnanto A, O'Sullivan K, et al. Robust smooth segmentation approach for array CGH data analysis. Bioinformatics 2007;23:2463-9.
18. Hsu L, Self S, Grove D, et al. Denoising array-based comparative genomic hybridization data using wavelets. Biostatistics 2005;6:211-26.
19. Lai WR, Johnson M, Kucherlapati R, et al. Comparative analysis of algorithms for identifying amplifications and deletions in array CGH data. Bioinformatics 2005;21:3763-70.
20. Willenbrock H, Fridlyand J. A comparison study: applying segmentation to array CGH data for downstream analyses. Bioinformatics 2005;21:4084-91.
21. Van de Wiel MA, Kim K, Vosse S, et al. CGHcall: calling aberrations for array CGH tumor profiles. Bioinformatics 2007;23:892-4.
22. Picard F, Robin S, Lebarbier E, et al. A segmentation/clustering model of the analysis of array CGH data. Biometrics 2007;63:758-66.
23. Attiyeh EF, Diskin SJ, Attiyeh MA, et al. Genomic copy number determination in cancer cells from single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays based on quantitative genotyping corrected for aneuploidy. Genome Res 2009;19:276-83.
24. Wang K, Li J, Li S, et al. Estimation of tumor heterogeneity using CGH array data. BMC Bioinformatics 2009;10:12.
25. Pique-Regi R, Monso-Varona J, Ortega A, et al. Sparse representation and bayesian detection of genome copy number alterations from microarray data. Bioinformatics 2008;24:309-18.
26. Díaz-Uriarte R, Rueda OM. AdaCGH: A parallelized webbased application and R package for the analysis of aCGH data. PLoS One 2007;2:e737.
27. Bengtsson H, Ray A, Spellman P, et al. A single-sample method for normalizing and combining full-resolution copy numbers from multiple platforms, labs and analysis methods. Bioinformatics 2009;25:861-7.
28. Zhang NR, Senbabaoglu Y, Li JZ. Joint estimation of DNA copy number from multiple platforms. Bioinformatics. Advance Access.
29. Leary RJ, Lin JC, Cummins J, et al. Integrated analysis of homozygous deletions, focal amplifications, and sequence alterations in breast and colorectal cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:16224-9.
30. Van de Wiel MA, Van Wieringen WN. CGHregions: dimension reduction for array CGH data with minimal information loss. Cancer Informatics 2007;2:55-63.
31. Van Wieringen WN, Van de Wiel MA, Ylstra B. Weighted clustering of called aCGH data. Biostatistics 2008;9:484-500.
32. Van Wieringen WN, Van de Wiel MA, Van der Vaart AW. A test for partial differential expression. JAmer Statist Assoc 2008;103:1039-49.
33. Gonzalez JR, Subirana I, Escarams G, et al. A latent class model to assess association between copy number and disease. BMC Bioinformatics 2009;10:172.
34. Gilbert PB. A modified false discovery rate multiple-comparisons procedure for discrete data, applied to human immunodeficiency virus genetics. Applied Statistics 2005;54: 143-58.
35. Chin SF, Wang Y, Thorne N, et al. Using array-comparative genomic hybridization to define molecular portraits of primary breast cancers. Oncogene 2007;26:1959-70.
36. Wilhelm M, Veltman JA, Olshen AB, et al. Array-based comparative genomic hybridiza-tion for the differential diagnosis of renal cell cancer. Cancer Research 2002; 62:957-60.
37. Jong K, Marchiori E, Van der Vaart AW, et al. Cross-platform array comparative genomic hybridization meta-analysis separates hematopoietic and mesenchymal from epithelial tumors. Oncogene 2007;26:1499-506.
38. Liu J, Mohammed J, Carter J, et al. Distance-based clustering of CGH data. Bioinformatics 2006;22:1971-8.
39. Liu J, Ranka S, Kahveci T. Markers improve clustering of CGH data. Bioinformatics 2007;23:450-7.
40. Somiari S, Shriver C, He J, et al. Global search for chromosomal abnormalities in infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast using array-comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics 2004;155:108-18.
41. Unger K, Malisch E, Thomas G, et al. Array CGH demonstrates characteristic aberration signatures in human papillary thyroid carcinomas governed by RET/PTC. Oncogene 2008;27:4592-602.
42. Shah SP, Cheung KJ Jr, Johnson NA, et al. Model-based clustering of array CGH data. Bioinformatics 2009;25: i30-i38.
43. O'Hagan RC, Brennan CW, Strahs A, et al. Array comparative genome hybridization for tumor classification and gene discovery in mouse models of malignant melanoma. Cancer Research 2003;63:5352-6.
44. Jönsson G, Naylor TL, Vallon-Christersson J, et al. Distinct genomic profiles in hereditary breast tumors identified by array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Research 2005;65:7612-21.
45. Wang S, Wang Y, Girard L, et al. An interval tree based feature reduction method for cancer classification using high-throughput DNA copy number data. In: Arabnia HR, Yang MQ, Yang JY, (eds). International Conference on Bioinformatics & Computational Biology, BIOCOMP 2007, Volume I, June 25-28, 2007. Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. Las Vegas, NV: CSREA Press;248-55.
46. Gambin T, Walczak K. A new classification method using array Comparative Genome Hybridization data, based on the concept of Limited Jumping Emerging Patterns. BMC Bioinformatics 2009;10:S1-S64.
47. Wang Y, Makedon F, Pearlman J. Tumor classification basedon DNA copy number aberrations determined using SNP arrays. Oncology Reports 2006;15:1057-9.
48. Rapaport F, Barillot E, Vert JP. Classification of array CGH data using fused SVM. Bioinformatics 2008;24:i375-i382.
49. Barutcuoglu Z, Airoldi E, Dumeaux V, et al. Aneuploidy prediction and tumor classification with heterogeneous hidden conditional random fields. Bioinformatics 2009;25: 1307-13.
50. Rueda OM, Diaz-Uriarte R. Finding recurrent regions of copy number variation: A review of methods. Current Bioinformatics 2009; in press.
51. Rouverol C, Stransky N, Hupé P, et al. Computation of recurrent minimal genomic alterations from array-CGH data. Bioinformatics 22(7):849-56.
52. Shah SP. Computational methods for identification of recurrent copy number alteration patterns by array CGH. Cytogenet Genome Res 2008;123:343-51.
53. Rueda OM, Diaz-Uriarte R. Detection of recurrent copy number alterations in the genome: taking among-subject heterogeneity seriously. BMC Bioinformatics 2009;10:308.
54. Shah SP, Lam WL, Ng RT, Murphy KP. Modeling recurrent DNA copy number alterations in array CGH data. Bioinformatics 2007;23(13):i450-8.
55. Feuk L, Carson A, Scherer S. Structural variation in the human genome. Nat Rev Genet 2006;7:85-97.
56. Carter N. Methods and strategies for analyzing copy number variation using DNA microarrays. Nat Genet 2007;39:S16-S21.
57. Weir BA, Woo MS, Getz G, et al. Characterizing the cancer genome in lung adenocarcinoma. Nature 2007;450:893-8.
58. Leary RJ, Cummins J, Wang TL, et al. Digital karyotyping. Nat Protoc 2007;2:1973-86.
59. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2006. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org (11 February 2010, date last accessed).
60. Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, et al. Bioconductor: Open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biology 2004;5:R80.
61. Hofmann WA, Weigmann A, Tauscher M, et al. Analysis of array-CGH data using the R and Bioconductor software suite. Comp Funct Genomics 2009;Article 201325.