Aneuploidy prediction and tumor classification with heterogeneous hidden conditional random fields

Bioinformatics

Volumn 25, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1307-1313

  Barutcuoglu, Zafer ^a   Airoldi, Edoardo M ^a,b   Dumeaux, Vanessa ^c   Schapire, Robert E ^a   Troyanskaya, Olga G ^a,b  

^a Princeton University   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; AMPLICON; ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER GENETICS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GENOMICS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MOLECULAR MODEL; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION;

ALGORITHMS; ANEUPLOIDY; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; GENE DOSAGE; NEOPLASMS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

EID: 65549083895     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn585     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Albertson,D. et al. (2000) Quantitative mapping of amplicon structure by array CGH identifies CYP24 as a candidate oncogene. Nat. Genet., 25, 144-146.
2. Albertson,D.G. (2006) Gene amplification in cancer. Trends Genet., 22, 447-455.
3. Beitzinger,M. et al. (2008) p73 poses a barrier to malignant transformation by limiting anchorage-independent growth. EMBO J., 27, 792-803.
4. Brown,LA. et al. (2006) Amplification of EMSY, a novel oncogene on 11q13, in high grade ovarian surface epithelial carcinomas. Gynecol. Oncol., 100, 264-270.
5. Chin,K. et al. (2006) Genomic and transcriptional aberrations linked to breast cancer pathophysiologies. Cancer Cell, 10, 529-541.
6. Han,S.H. et al. (2003) VDUP1 upregulated by TGF-betal and 1,25-dihydorxyvitamin D3 inhibits tumor cell growth by blocking cell-cycle progression. Oncogene, 22, 4035-4046.
7. Heim,S. and Mitelman,F. (1989) Primary chromosome abnormalities in human neoplasia. Adv. Cancer Res., 52, 1-43.
8. Huang, J. et al. (2007) Genontic and functional evidence for an ARID1A tumor suppressor role. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 46, 745-750.
9. Jonsson,G. et al. (2005) Distinct genontic profiles in hereditary breast tumors identified by array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res., 65, 7612-7621.
10. Kim,Y. and Kim,J. (2004) Gradient LASSO for feature selection. In ICML '04: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Machine Learning, ACM, New York, NY, USA, p. 60.
11. Lai,W.R. et al. (2005) Comparative analysis of algorithms for identifying amplifications and deletions in array CGH data. Bioinformatics, 21, 3763-3770.
12. Liu,Z. et al. (2007) Sparse logistic regression with Lp penalty for biomarker identification. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol., 6 Article 6.
13. Myers,C.L. et al. (2004) Accurate detection of aneuploidies in array CGH and gene expression microarray data. Bioinformatics, 20, 3533-3543.
14. Nag,A. et al. (2004) Cul4A physically associates with MDM2 and participates in the proteolysis of p53. Cancer Res., 64, 8152-8155.
15. Nocedal, J. (1980) Updating quasi-Newton matrices with limited storage. Math. Comput., 35, 773-782.
16. Pollack, J. R. et al. (2002) Microarray analysis reveals a major direct role of DNA copy number alteration in the transcriptional program of human breast tumors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 12963-12968.
17. Qi,Y. et al. (2005) Bayesian conditional random fields. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Jan 6-8, 2005, Cowell,R.G. and Ghahramani,Z. ed., Savannah Hotel, Barbados, pp.269-276.
18. Rapaport,F. et al. (2008) Classification of arrayCGH data using a fused SVM. Bioinformatics. 24, i375-i382.
19. Rocke,D.M. and Durbin,B. (2001) A model for measurement error for gene expression arrays. J. Comput. Biol., 8, 557-569.
20. Rueda,O.M. and Diaz-Uriarte,R. (2007) Flexible and accurate detection of genomic copy-number changes from aCGH. PLoS. Comput. Biol., 3 e122.
21. Shah,S.P. et al. (2007) Modeling recurrent DNA copy number alterations in array CGH data. Bioinformatics, 23, i450-i458.
22. Snijders,A.M. et al. (2005) Rare amplicons implicate frequent deregulation of cell fate specification pathways in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncogene, 24, 4232-4242.
23. Taskar,B. et al. (2004) Max-margin Markov networks. Adv. Neu. Infor. Proc. Sys.. 16, 51.
24. Teh,Y.W. et al. (2006) Hierarchical Dirichlet processes. J. Am. Star. Assoc., 101, 1566-1581.
25. Tibshirani, R. (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. R. Star. Soc. Ser. B, 58, 267-288.
26. van Beers,E.H. and Nederlof,P.M. (2006) Array-CGH and breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res., 8, 210.
27. Wessels,L.F.A. et al. (2002) Molecular classification of breast carcinomas by comparative genontic hybridization: A specific somatic genetic profile for BRCA1 tumors. Cancer Res., 62, 7110-7117.
28. Yi,C.-H. et al. (2007) Loss of fibulin-2 expression is associated with breast cancer progression. Am. J. Pathol., 170, 1535-1545.
29. Zou,H. and Hastie,T. (2005) Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J. R. Star. Soc. Ser. B, 67, 301-320.