Robust smooth segmentation approach for array CGH data analysis

Bioinformatics

Volumn 23, Issue 18, 2007, Pages 2463-2469

  Huang, Jian ^a   Gusnanto, Arief ^b   O'Sullivan, Kathleen ^a   Staaf, Johan ^c   Borg, Åke ^c   Pawitan, Yudi ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

^b MRC BIOSTATISTICS UNIT   (United Kingdom)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^d KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CHROMOSOME; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GENOMICS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; STUDENT T TEST;

EID: 34548725570     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm359     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Benjamini,Y. and Hochberg,Y. (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 57, 289-300.
2. Dongarra,J.J., et al. (1979). LINPACK Users' Guide. SIAM, Philadelphia.
3. Dudoit,S. et al. (2002) Comparison of discrimination methods for the classification of tumors using gene expression data. Journal of the American Statistical Association., 97, 77-87.
4. Eilers,P.H.C. and de Menezes,R.X. (2003) Quantile smoothing of array CGH data. Bioinformatics, 21, 1146-1153.
5. Engler,D.A. et al. (2006) A pseudolikelihood approach for simultaneous analysis of array comparative genomic hybridiztions. Bioinformatics, 7, 339-421.
6. Fridlyand,J. et al. (2004) Hidden markov models approach to the analysis of array CGH data. J. Multivar. Anal., 90, 132-153.
7. Hsu,L. et al. (2005) Denoising array-based comparative genomic hybridization data using wavelets. Biostatistics, 6, 211-226.
8. Hupe,P. et al. (2004) Analysis of array CGH data: From signal ratio to gain and loss of DNA regions. Bioinformatics, 20, 3413-3422.
9. Jonsson,G. et al. (2005) Distinct genomic profiles in hereditary breast tumors identified by array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res., 65, 7612-7621.
10. Kronenwett,U. et al. (2004) Improved grading of breast adenocarcinomas based on genomic instability. Cancer Res., 64 904-909.
11. Lengauer,C. et al. (1998) Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature, 396, 643-649.
12. Lai,W.R. et al. (2005) Comparative analysis of algorithms for identifying amplifications and deletions in array CGH data. Bioinformatics, 21, 3763-3770.
13. Lee,Y.J. et al. (2006) Generalized Linear Models with Random Effects. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London.
14. Molinaro,A.M. et al. (2005) Prediction error estimation: A comparison of resampling methods. Bioinformatics, 21, 3301-3307.
15. Olshen,A.B. et al. (2004) Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data. Biostatistics, 5 557-572.
16. Pawitan,Y. (1996) Automatic estimation of coherence of bivariate time series. Biometrika, 83, 419-432.
17. Pawitan,Y. (2001) In All Likelihood: Statistical Modelling and Inference Using Likelihood. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
18. Pawitan,Y. et al. (2005) FDR, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies. Bioinformatics, 21, 3017-3024.
19. Picard,F. et al. (2005) A statistical approach for array CGH data analysis. BMC Bioinformatics, 21, 6-27.
20. Pollack,J.R. et al. (2002) Microarray analysis reveals a major direct role of DNA copy number alteration in the transcriptional program of human breast tumors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 12963-12968.
21. Ruppert,D. et al. (2003). Semiparametric Regression. Cambridge University Press, Cambidge.
22. Snijders,A.M. et al. (2001) Assembly of microarrays for genome-wide measurement of DNA copy number. Nat. Genet., 29, 263-264.
23. Storey,J.D. (2002) A direct approach to false discovery rates, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 64, 479-498.
24. van Beers,E.H. et al. (2005) Comparative genomic hybridization profiles in human BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast tumors highlight differential sets of genomic aberrations. Cancer Res., 65, 822-827.
25. Wang,P. et al. (2005) A method for calling gains and losses in array CGH data. Biostatistics, 61, 45-58.
26. Willenbrock,H. and Fridlyand,J. (2005) A comparison study: Applying segmentation to array CGH data for downstream analyses. Bioinformatics, 21, 4084-4091.