A probe-density-based analysis method for array CGH data: Simulation, normalization and centralization

Bioinformatics

Volumn 24, Issue 16, 2008, Pages 1749-1756

  Chen, Hung I Harry ^a   Hsu, Fang Han ^a   Jiang, Yuan ^b   Tsai, Mong Hsun ^a   Yang, Pan Chyr ^c   Meltzer, Paul S ^b   Chuang, Eric Y ^a   Chen, Yidong ^b  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CELL CULTURE; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DNA REPLICATION; HIDDEN MARKOV MODEL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; LUNG CANCER; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 49549100274     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn321     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Attoor,S. et al. (2004) Which is better for cDNA-microarray-based classification: Ratios or direct intensities. Bioinformatics, 20, 2513-2520.
2. Balagurunathan,Y. et al. (2002) Simulation of cDNA microarrays via a parameterized random signal model. J. Biomed. Opt., 7, 507-523.
3. Bartos,J.D. et al. (2007) aCGH local copy number aberrations associated with overall copy number genomic instability in colorectal cancer: Coordinate involvement of the regions including BCR and ABL. Mutat. Res., 615, 1-11.
4. Bilke,S. et al. (2005) Detection of low level genomic alterations by comparative genomic hybridization based on cDNA micro-arrays. Bioinformatics, 21, 1138-1145.
5. Bolstad,B. et al. (2003) A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on bias and variance. Bioinformatics, 19, 185-193.
6. Carrasco,D.R. et al. (2006) High-resolution genomic profiles define distinct clinico-pathogenetic subgroups of multiple myeloma patients. Cancer Cell, 9, 313-325.
7. Chin,K. et al. (2006) Genomic and transcriptional aberrations linked to breast cancer pathophysiologies. Cancer Cell, 10, 529-541.
8. Chu,Y.W. et al. (1997) Selection of invasive and metastatic subpopulations from a human lung adenocarcinoma cell line. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., 17, 353-360.
9. Dempster,A.P. et al. (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 39, 1-38.
10. Durbin,R. et al. (1999) Biological Sequence Analysis: Probabilistic Models of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
11. Franc,V. and Hlavac,V. (2004) Statistical Pattern Recognition Toolbox for Matlab User's guide, Czech Technical University.
12. Hastie,T.J. and Tibshirani,R.J. (1990) Generalized Additive Models Chapman and Hall, New York.
13. Ho,C.-C. et al. (2002) Up-regulated caveolin-1 accentuates the metastasis capability of lung adenocarcinoma by inducing filopodia formation. Am. J. Pathol. 161, 1647-1656.
14. Katoh,H. et al. (2006) Genetic inactivation of the APC gene contributes to the malignant progression of sporadic hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 45, 1050-1057.
15. Khojasteh,M. et al. (2005) A stepwise framework for the normalization of array CGH data. BMC Bioinformatics, 6, 274.
16. Lai,W.R. et al. (2005) Comparative analysis of algorithms for identifying amplifications and deletions in array CGH data. Bioinformatics, 21, 3763-3770.
17. Lengauer,C. et al. (1998) Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature, 396, 643-649.
18. Lipson,D. (2007) Computational Aspects of DNA Copy Number Measurement PhD Dissertation, Computer Science Department, Israel Institute of Technology.
19. Marioni,J.C. et al. (2006) BioHMM: A heterogeneous hidden Markov model for segmentmg array CGH data. Bioinformatics, 22, 1144-1146.
20. Neuvial,P. et al. (2006) Spatial normalization of array-CGH data. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 264.
21. Neve,R.M. et al. (2006) A collection of breast cancer cell lines for the study of functionally distinct cancer subtypes. Cancer Cell 10, 515-527.
22. Picard,F. et al. (2007) A segmentation/clustering model for the analysis of array CGH data. Biometrics, 63, 758-766.
23. Pinkel,D. et al. (1998) High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat. Genet., 20, 207-211.
24. Pollack,J.R. et al. (1999) Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays. Nat. Genet., 23, 41-46.
25. Quackenbush,J. (2002) Microarray data normalization and transformation. Nature Genetics, 32, 496-501.
26. Rabiner,L.R. (1989) A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc. IEEE, 77, 257-286.
27. Schröck,E. et al. (1996) Multicolor spectral karyotyping of human chromosomes. Science, 273, 494-497.
28. Shah,S.P. et al. (2006) Integrating copy numbers polymorphisms into array CGH analysis using a robust HMM. Bioinformatics, 22 c431-c439.
29. Staaf,J. et al. (2007) Normalization of array-CGH data: Influence of copy number imbalances. BMC Genomics, 8, 382.
30. van de Wiel,M.A. et al. (2007) CGHcall: Calling aberrations for array CGH tumor profiles. Bioinformatics, 23, 892-894.
31. Venkatraman,E.S. and Olshen,A.B. (2007) A faster circular binary segmentation algorithm for the analysis of array CGH data. Bioinformatics, 23, 657-663.
32. Wand,M.P. and Jones,M.C. (1995) Kernel Smoothing, Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.
33. Willenbrock,H. and Fridlyand,J. (2005) A comparison study: Applying segmentation to array CGH data for downstream analyses. Bioinformatics, 21, 4084-4091.
34. Zien,A. et al. (2001) Centralization: A new method for the normalization of gene. expression data. Bioinformatics, 17, 323-331.