Comparative analysis of algorithms for identifying amplifications and deletions in array CGH data

Bioinformatics

Volumn 21, Issue 19, 2005, Pages 3763-3770

  Lai, Weil R ^a   Johnson, Mark D ^b   Kucherlapati, Raju ^a   Park, Peter J ^a,c  

^a LABORATORY FOR MOLECULAR MEDICINE   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENOMIC DNA;

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CARCINOGENESIS; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; DATA ANALYSIS; DNA MICROARRAY; GENETIC ALGORITHM; GLIOBLASTOMA; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 27544483495     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti611     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Autio,R. et al. (2003) CGH-Plotter: MATLAB toolbox for CGH-data analysis. Bioinformatics, 19, 1714-1715.
2. Beheshti,B. et al. (2003) Chromosomal localization of DNA amplifications in neuroblastoma tumors using cDNA microarray comparative genomic hybridization. Neoplasia, 5, 53-62.
3. Bredel,M. et al. (2005) High-resolution genome-wide mapping of genetic alterations in human glial brain tumors. Cancer Res., 65, 4088-4096.
4. Brennan,C. et al. (2004) High-resolution global profiling of genomic alterations with long oligonucleotide microarray. Cancer Res., 64, 4744-4748.
5. Cleveland,W.S. (1979) Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 74, 829-836.
6. Daruwala,R.-S. et al. (2004) A versatile statistical analysis algorithm to detect genome copy number variation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 16292-16297.
7. Eilers,P.H.C. and de Menezes,R.X. (2005) Quantile smoothing of array CGH data. Bioinformatics, 21, 1146-1153.
8. Fridlyand,J. et al. (2004) Hidden Markov models approach to the analysis of array CGH data. J. Multivariate Anal., 90, 132-153.
9. Hodgson,G. et al. (2001) Genome scanning with array CGH delineates regional alterations in mouse islet carcinomas. Nat. Genet., 29, 459-464.
10. Hsu,L. et al. (2005) Denoising array-based comparative genomic hybridization data using wavelets. Biostatistics, 6, 211-226.
11. Hupe,P. et al. (2004) Analysis of array CGH data: From signal ratio to gain and loss of DNA regions. Bioinformatics, 20, 3413-3422.
12. Ishkanian,A.S. et al. (2004) A tiling resolution DNA microarray with complete coverage of the human genome. Nat. Genet., 36, 299-303.
13. Jong,K., Marchiori,E., van der Vaart,A., Ylstra,B., Meijer,G. and Weiss,M. (2003) Chromosomal breakpoint detection in human cancer. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Vol. 2611, pp. 54-65.
14. Jong,K. et al. (2004) Breakpoint identification and smoothing of array comparative genomic hybridization data. Bioinformatics, 20, 3636-3637.
15. Koschny,R. et al. (2002) Comparative genomic hybridization in glioma: A meta-analysis of 509 cases. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet., 135, 147-159.
16. Kraus,J.A. et al. (2002) Molecular genetic analysis of the TP53, PTEN, CDKN2A, EGFR, CDK4 and MDM2 tumour-associated genes in supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumours and glioblastomas of childhood. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol., 28, 325-333.
17. Lingjaerde,O.C. et al. (2005) CGH-Explorer: A program for analysis of array-CGH data. Bioinformatics, 21, 821-822.
18. Lucito,R. et al. (2003) Representational oligonucleotide microarray analysis: A high-resolution method to detect genome copy number variation. Genome Res., 13, 2291-2305.
19. Myers,C.L. et al. (2004) Accurate detection of aneuploidies in array CGH and gene expression microarray data. Bioinformatics, 20, 3533-3543.
20. Olshen,A.B. and Venkatraman,E.S. (2002) Change-point analysis of array-based comparative genomic hybridization data. American Statistical Association Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, American Statistical Association, Alexandria, VA, pp. 2530-2535.
21. Olshen,A.B. et al. (2004) Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data. Biostatistics, 5, 557-572.
22. Picard,F. et al. (2005) A statistical approach for array CGH data analysis. BMC Bioinformatics, 6, 27.
23. Pinkel,D. and Albertson,D.G. (2005) Array comparative genomic hybridization and its applications in cancer. Nat. Genet., 37, Suppl 11-17.
24. Pinkel,D. et al. (1998) High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat. Genet., 20, 207-211.
25. Pollack,J.R. et al. (1999) Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays. Nat. Genet., 23, 41-46.
26. Pollack,J.R. et al. (2002) Microarray analysis reveals a major direct role of DNA copy number alteration in the transcriptional program of human breast tumors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 12963-12968.
27. Polzehl,J. and Spokoiny,V (2000) Adaptive weights smoothing with applications to image restoration. J. R. Statist. Soc. B., 62, Part 2, 335-354.
28. Development Core Team (2004) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
29. Sebat,J. et al. (2004) Large-scale copy number polymorphism in the human genome. Science, 305, 525-528.
30. Sen,A. and Srivastava,M. (1975) On tests for detecting a change in mean. Ann. Stat., 3, 98-108.
31. Smyth,G.K. (2004) Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol., 3, Article 3.
32. Snijders,A.M. et al. (2003) Shaping of tumor and drug-resistant genomes by instability and selection. Oncogene, 22, 4370-4379.
33. Solinas-Toldo,S. et al. (1997) Matrix-based comparative genomic hybridization: Biochips to screen for genomic imbalances. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 20, 399-407.
34. Wang,P. et al. (2005) A method for calling gains and losses in array CGH data. Biostatistics, 6, 45-58.