Computational methods for identification of recurrent copy number alteration patterns by array CGH

Cytogenetic and Genome Research

Volumn 123, Issue 1-4, 2009, Pages 343-351

  Shah, S P ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b BRITISH COLUMBIA CANCER AGENCY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CANCER RESEARCH; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; GENE DOSAGE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; COMPUTERS; GENE DOSAGE; HUMANS; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE;

EID: 62549158266     PISSN: 14248581     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000184726     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Aguirre AJ, Brennan C, Bailey G, Sinha R, Feng B, et al: High-resolution characterization of the pancreatic adenocarcinoma genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:9067-9072 (2004).
2. Andersson R, Bruder CE, Piotrowski A, Menzel U, Nord H, et al: A segmental maximum a posteriori approach to genome-wide copy number profiling. Bioinformatics 24:751-758 (2008).
3. Balmain A, Gray J, Ponder B: The genetics and genomics of cancer. Nat Genet 33:238-244 (2003).
4. Bejjani BA, Shaffer LG: Application of array-based comparative genomic hybridization to clinical diagnostics. J Mol Diagn 8:528-533 (2006).
5. Ben-Dor A, Lipson D, Tsalenko A, Reimers M, Baumbusch LO, et al: Framework for identifying common aberrations in DNA copy number data, in Research in Computational Molecular Biology, Volume 4453 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp 122-136 (Springer, Berlin 2007).
6. Berger JA, Hautaniemi S, Mitra SK, Astola J: Jointly analyzing gene expression and copy number data in breast cancer using data reduction models. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform 3:2-16 (2006).
7. Beroukhim R, Getz G, Nghiemphu L, Barretina J, Hsueh T, et al: Assessing the significance of chromosomal aberrations in cancer: methodology and application to glioma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:20007-20012 (2007).
8. Broet P, Richardson S: Detection of gene copy number changes in CGH microarrays using a spatially correlated mixture model. Bioinformatics 22:911-918 (2006).
9. Campbell PJ, Stephens PJ, Pleasance ED, O'Meara S, Li H, et al: Identification of somatically acquired rearrangements in cancer using genome-wide massively parallel paired-end sequencing. Nat Genet 40:722-729 (2008).
10. Chin L, Gray J: Translating insights from the cancer genome into clinical practice. Nature 242:553-563 (2008).
11. Chin SF, Teschendorff AE, Marioni JC, Wang Y, Barbosa-Morais NL, et al: High resolution aCGH and expression profiling identifies a novel genomic subtype of ER negative breast cancer. Genome Biol 8:R215 (2007).
12. Coe BP, Lockwood WW, Girard L, Chari R, Macaulay C, et al: Differential disruption of cell cycle pathways in small cell and non-small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 94:1927-1935 (2006).
13. Colella S, Yau C, Taylor JM, Mirza G, Butler H, et al: QuantiSNP: an Objective Bayes Hidden-Markov Model to detect and accurately map copy number variation using SNP genotyping data. Nucleic Acids Res 35:2013-2025 (2007).
14. Collins FS, Barker AD: Mapping the cancer genome. Pinpointing the genes involved in cancer will help chart a new course across the complex landscape of human malignancies. Sci Am 296:50-57 (2007).
15. de Leeuw RJ, Davies JJ, Rosenwald A, Bebb G, Gascoyne RD, et al: Comprehensive whole genome array CGH profiling of mantle cell lymphoma model genomes. Hum Mol Genet 13:1827-1837 (2004).
16. Diskin SJ, Eck T, Greshock J, Mosse YP, Naylor T, et al: STAC: A method for testing the significance of DNA copy number aberrations across multiple array-CGH experiments. Genome Res 16:1149-1158 (2006).
17. Engler DA, Mohapatra G, Louis DN, Betensky RA: A pseudolikelihood approach for simultaneous analysis of array comparative genomic hybridizations (aCGH). Biostatistics 7:399-421 (2006).
18. Esteller M: Cancer epigenomics: DNA methylomes and histone-modification maps. Nat Rev Genet 8:286-298 (2007).
19. Fridlyand J, Snijders A, Pinkel D, Albertson D, Jain A: Hidden Markov Models approach to the analysis of array CGH data. J Multivariate Anal 90:132-153 (2004).
20. Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, et al: Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol 5:R80 (2004).
21. Guan Y, Kuo WL, Stilwell JL, Takano H, Lapuk AV, et al: Amplification of PVT1 contributes to the pathophysiology of ovarian and breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 13:5745-5755 (2007).
22. Guha S, Li Y, Neuberg D: Bayesian hidden Markov modeling of array CGH data. J Am Stat Assoc 103:485-497 (2008).
23. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA: The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100:57-70 (2000).
24. Heidenblad M, Lindgren D, Veltman JA, Jonson T, Mahlamaki EH, et al: Microarray analyses reveal strong influence of DNA copy number alterations on the transcriptional patterns in pancreatic cancer: implications for the interpretation of genomic amplifications. Oncogene 24:1794-1801 (2005).
25. Hirsch FR, Varella-Garcia M, Bunn PA, Di Maria MV, Veve R, et al: Epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small-cell lung carcinomas: correlation between gene copy number and protein expression and impact on prognosis. J Clin Oncol 21:3798-3807 (2003).
26. Hoglund M, Sehn L, Connors JM, Gascoyne RD, Siebert R, et al: Identification of cytogenetic subgroups and karyotypic pathways of clonal evolution in follicular lymphomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 39:195-204 (2004).
27. Hosoya N, Sanada M, Nannya Y, Nakazaki K, Wang L, et al: Genomewide screening of DNA copy number changes in chronic myelogenous leukemia with the use of high resolution array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 45:482-494 (2006).
28. Hupe P, Stransky N, Thiery J, Radvanyi F, Barillot E: Analysis of array CGH data: from signal ratio to gain and loss of DNA regions. Bioinformatics 20:3413-3422 (2004).
29. Iafrate AJ, Feuk L, Rivera MN, Listewnik ML, Donahoe PK, et al: Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome. Nat Genet 36:949-951 (2004).
30. Idbaih A, Marie Y, Lucchesi C, Pierron G, Manie E, et al: BAC array CGH distinguishes mutually exclusive alterations that define clinicogenetic subtypes of gliomas. Int J Cancer 122:1778-1786 (2008).
31. Iehara T, Hosoi H, Akazawa K, Matsumoto Y, Yamamoto K, et al: MYCN gene amplification is a powerful prognostic factor even in infantile neuroblastoma detected by mass screening. Br J Cancer 94:1510-1515 (2006).
32. Ishkanian A, Malloff C, Watson S, DeLeeuw R, Chi B, et al: A tiling resolution DNA microarray with complete coverage of the human genome. Nat Genet 36:299-303 (2004).
33. Khojasteh M, Lam WL, Ward RK, MacAulay C: A stepwise framework for the normalization of array CGH data. BMC Bioinformatics 6:274 (2005).
34. Klijn C, Holstege H, de Ridder J, Liu X, Reinders M, et al: Identification of cancer genes using a statistical framework for multiexperiment analysis of nondiscretized array CGH data. Nucleic Acids Res 36:e13 (2008).
35. Krishnapuram B, Carin L, Figueiredo MA, Hartemink AJ: Sparse multinomial logistic regression: fast algorithms and generalization bounds. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 27:957-968 (2005).
36. Lai W, Johnson M, Kucherlapati R, Park P: Comparative analysis of algorithms for identifying amplifications and deletions in array CGH data. Bioinformatics 21:3763-3770 (2005).
37. Lee H, Kong SW, Park PJ: Integrative analysis reveals the direct and indirect interactions between DNA copy number aberrations and gene expression changes. Bioinformatics 24:889-896 (2008).
38. Lipson D, Ben-Dor A, Dehan E, Yakhini Z: Joint analysis of DNA copy numbers and gene expression levels, in WABI, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), pp 135 (Springer, Berlin 2004).
39. Lipson D, Aumann Y, Ben-Dor A, Linial N, Yakhini Z: Efficient calculation of interval scores for DNA copy number data analysis. J Comput Biol 13:215-228 (2006).
40. Marioni JC, Thorne NP, Tavare S: BioHMM: a heterogeneous hidden Markov model for segmenting array CGH data. Bioinformatics 22:1144-1146 (2006).
41. Marioni JC, Thorne NP, Valsesia A, Fitzgerald T, Redon R, et al: Breaking the waves: improved detection of copy number variation from microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization. Genome Biol 8:R228 (2007).
42. Neuvial P, Hupe P, Brito I, Liva S, Manie E, et al: Spatial normalization of array-CGH data. BMC Bioinformatics 7:264 (2006).
43. Olshen A, Venkatraman E, Lucito R, Wigler M: Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data. Biostatistics 5:557-572 (2004).
44. Pinkel D, Albertson D: Array comparative genomic hybridization and its applications in cancer. Nat Genet 37 Suppl:11-17 (2005).
45. Pique-Regi R, Monso-Varona J, Ortega A, Seeger RC, Triche TJ, Asgharzadeh S: Sparse representation and Bayesian detection of genome copy number alterations from microarray data. Bioinformatics 24:309-318 (2008).
46. Pollack JR, Sorlie T, Perou CM, Rees CA, Jeffrey SS, et al: Microarray analysis reveals a major direct role of DNA copy number alteration in the transcriptional program of human breast tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:12963-12968 (2002).
47. Rapaport F, Barillot E, Vert JP: Classification of array CGH data using a fused SVM. Bioinformatics 24:i375-i382 (2008).
48. Redon R, Ishikawa S, Fitch KR, Feuk L, Perry GH, et al: Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature 444:444-454 (2006).
49. Rouveirol C, Stransky N, Hupe P, Rosa PL, Viara E, et al: Computation of recurrent minimal genomic alterations from array-CGH data. Bioinformatics 22:849-856 (2006).
50. Rueda OM, Diaz-Uriarte R: Flexible and accurate detection of genomic copy-number changes from aCGH. PLoS Comput Biol 3:e122 (2007).
51. Schwaenen C, Nessling M, Wessendorf S, Salvi T, Wrobel G, et al: Automated array-based genomic profiling in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: development of a clinical tool and discovery of recurrent genomic alterations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:1039-1044 (2004).
52. Shah SP, Xuan X, DeLeeuw RJ, Khojasteh M, Lam WL, et al: Integrating copy number polymorphisms into array CGH analysis using a robust HMM. Bioinformatics 22:431-439 (2006).
53. Shah SP, Lam WL, Ng RT, Murphy KP: Modeling recurrent DNA copy number alterations in array CGH data. Bioinformatics 23:450-458 (2007).
54. Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, McGuire WL: Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science 235:177-182 (1987).
55. Stjernqvist S, Ryden T, Skold M, Staaf J: Continuous-index hidden Markov modeling of array CGH copy number data. Bioinformatics 23:1006-1014 (2007).
56. Tomlins SA, Rhodes DR, Perner S, Dhanasekaran SM, Mehra R, et al: Recurrent fusion of TMPRSS2 and ETS transcription factor genes in prostate cancer. Science 310:644-648 (2005).
57. van de Wiel MA, Kim KI, Vosse SJ, van Wieringen WN, Wilting SM, Ylstra B: CGHcall: calling aberrations for array CGH tumor profiles. Bioinformatics 23:892-894 (2007).
58. van Wieringen WN, van de Wiel MA: Nonparametric testing for DNA copy number induced differential mRNA gene expression. Biometrics 64:1-25 (2008).
59. van Wieringen WN, Van De Wiel MA, Ylstra B: Weighted clustering of called array CGH data. Biostatistics 9:484-500 (2007).
60. Venkatraman ES, Olshen AB: A faster circular binary segmentation algorithm for the analysis of array CGH data. Bioinformatics 23:657-663 (2007).
61. Weinberg RA: The Biology of Cancer (Garland Science, Taylor and Francis Group, New York 2007).
62. Willenbrock H, Fridlyand J: A comparison study: applying segmentation to array CGH data for downstream analyses. Bioinformatics 21:4084-4091 (2005).
63. Wong KK, deLeeuw RJ, Dosanjh NS, Kimm LR, Cheng Z, et al: A comprehensive analysis of common copy-number variations in the human genome. Am J Hum Genet 80:91-104 (2007).
64. Yaziji H, Goldstein LC, Barry TS, Werling R, Hwang H, et al: HER-2 testing in breast cancer using parallel tissue-based methods. JAMA 291:1972-1977 (2004).