Description of dynamic shared knowledge: An exploratory study during a competitive team sports interaction

Ergonomics

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 120-138

  Bourbousson, J ^a   Poizat, G ^b   Saury, J ^a   Seve, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

Author keywords

Course of action; Shared knowledge; Team cognition; Team sport; Teamwork

Indexed keywords

COURSE OF ACTION; SHARED KNOWLEDGE; TEAM COGNITION; TEAM SPORT; TEAMWORK;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BASKETBALL; BIOENGINEERING; COGNITION; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; COOPERATION; FRANCE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RECORDING; SPORT; VIDEORECORDING;

ADOLESCENT; BASKETBALL; COGNITION; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; FRANCE; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SPORTS; TAPE RECORDING; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 79551596193     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2010.544763     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Artman, H., 2000. Team situation assessment and information distribution. Ergonomics, 43, 1111-1128.
2. Bourbousson, J., Sève, C., and McGarry, T., 2010a. Spacetime coordination patterns in basketball: Part 1. Intraand inter-couplings among player dyads. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28, 339-347.
3. Bourbousson, J., Sève, C., and McGarry, T., 2010b. Spacetime coordination patterns in basketball: Part 2. The interaction between the two teams. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28, 349-358.
4. Bourbousson, J., et al., 2010c. Team coordination in basketball: description of the cognitive connections between teammates. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 22, 150-166.
5. Cannon-Bowers, J.A. and Bowers, C., 2006. Applying work team results to sports teams: Opportunities and cautions. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4, 363-369.
6. Cannon-Bowers, J.A., et al., 1995. Defining team competencies and establishing team training requirements. In: R. Guzzo and E. Salas, eds. Teams: Their training and performance. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 101-124.
7. Clark, H. and Brennan, S., 1991. Grounding in communication. In: L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine, and S.D. Teasley, eds. Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: APA.
8. Clark, H. and Marshall, C., 1998. Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In: A.K. Joshi, B.L.Webber, and I.A. Sag, eds. Elements of discourse understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press, 10-63.
9. Cohen, S.G. and Bailey, D.E., 1997. What makes teams work? Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239-290.
10. Cooke, N.J. and Gorman, J.C., 2006. Assessment of team cognition. In: P. Karwowski, ed. International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors, 2nd ed. London: Taylor and Francis Ltd, 270-275.
11. Cooke, N.J., Gorman, J.C., and Rowe, L.J., 2009. An ecological perspective on team cognition. In: E. Salas, G.F. Goodwin, and C.S. Burke, eds. Team effectiveness in complex organizations: Cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 157-182.
12. Cooke, N.J., Gorman, J.C., and Winner, J., 2007. Team cognition. In: F. Durso, R. Nickerson, S. Dumais, S. Lewandowsky, and T. Perfect, eds. Handbook of applied cognition. New York, NY: Wiley, 239-268.
13. Cooke, N.J., et al., 2004. Advances in measuring team cognition. In: E. Salas, ed. Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 83-106.
14. Daniellou, F., 2005. The French-speaking ergonomists' approach to work activity: cross-influences of field intervention and conceptual models. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 6, 409-427.
15. Durso, F.T. and Gronlund, S.D., 1999. Situation awareness. In: F.T. Durso, R.S. Nickerson, R.W. Schvaneveldt, S.T. Dumais, D.S. Lindsay, and M.T.H. Chi, eds. Handbook of applied cognition. New York: John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 283-314.
16. Eccles, D.W. and Johnson, M.B., 2009. Letting the social and cognitive merge: new concepts for an understanding of group functioning in sport. In: S.D. Mellalieu and S. Hanton, eds. Applied sport psychology advances: A review. London: Routledge, 281-316.
17. Eccles, D.W. and Tenenbaum, G., 2004. Why an expert team is more than a team of experts: a social-cognitive conceptualization of team coordination and communication in sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 26, 542-560.
18. Eccles, D.W. and Tenenbaum, G., 2007. A social cognitive perspective on team functioning in sport. In: G. Tenenbaum and R.C. Eklund, eds. Handbook of sport psychology. New York, NY: Wiley, 264-283.
19. Edwards, B.D., et al., 2006. Relationships among team ability composition, team mental models, and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 727-736.
20. Endsley, M.R., 1995. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32-64.
21. Endsley, M. and Pearce, C., 2001. Shared cognition in top management teams: implications for new venture performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 145-160.
22. Endsley, M.R. and Robertson, M.M., 2000. Situation awareness in aircraft maintenance teams. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 26, 301-325.
23. Ericsson, K.A. and Simon, H.A., 1980. Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87 (3), 215-251.
24. Fiore, S.M. and Salas, E., 2006. Team cognition and expert teams: developing insights from cross-disciplinary analysis of exceptional teams. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4, 369-375.
25. Fiore, S.M. and Salas, E., 2008. Cognition, competition, and coordination: the 'why' and the 'how' of the relevance of the sports sciences to learning and performance in the military. Military Psychology, 20, 1-9.
26. Fiore, S.M., et al., 2010. Towards an understanding of macrocognition in teams: developing and defining complex collaborative processes and products. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 11, 250-271.
27. Gilbert, W.D., Trudel, P., and Haughian, L.P., 1999. Interactive decision making factors considered by coaches of youth ice hockey during games. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 18, 290-311.
28. Goodwin, C., 1994. Recording human interaction in natural settings. Pragmatics, 3, 181-209.
29. Goodwin, C., 2000. Practices of seeing - visual analysis: an ethnomethodological approach. In: T. van Leeuwen and C. Jewitt, eds. Handbook of visual analysis. London: Sage, 157-182.
30. Goodwin, C., 2007. Environmentally coupled gestures. In: S.D. Duncan, J. Cassel, and E.T. Levy, eds. Gesture and the dynamic dimensions of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 195-212.
31. Goodwin, G.F., 2008. Psychology in sports and the military: building understanding and collaboration across disciplines. Military Psychology, 20, 147-153.
32. Gorman, J.C., Cooke, N.J., and Winner, J.L., 2006. Measuring team situation awareness in decentralized command and control environments. Ergonomics, 49, 1312-1325.
33. Gréhaigne, J.-F., Richard, J.-F., and Griffin, P.L.L., 2004. Teaching and learning team sports and games. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
34. Griffin, T.G.C., Young, M.S., and Stanton, N.A., 2010. Investigating accident causation through information network modelling. Ergonomics, 53, 198-210.
35. Grote, G., et al., 2010. Adaptive coordination and heedfulness make better cockpit crews. Ergonomics, 53, 211-228.
36. Hauw, D. and Durand, M., 2005. How do athletes interact with the environment in competition? A situated analysis of trampolinists' activity. European Review of Applied Psychology, 55, 207-215.
37. Heath, C. and Luff, P., 1992. Explicating face to face interaction. In: N. Gilbert, ed. Researching social life. London: Sage, 306-327.
38. Helsen, W., Gilis, B., and Weston, M., 2007. Helsen, Gilis, and Weston (2006) do not err in questioning the optical error hypothesis as the only major account for explaining offside decision-making errors. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25, 991-994.
39. Hoc, J.M., 2001. Towards a cognitive approach to humanmachine cooperation in dynamic situations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54, 509-540.
40. Hutchins, E., 1995. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. James, N. and Patrick, J., 2004. The role of situation awareness in sport. In: S. Banbury and S. Tremblay, eds. A cognitive approach to situation awareness: theory and application. Adershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
42. Janelle, C.M. and Hatfield, B., 2008. Visual attention and brain processes that underlie expert performance: implications for sport and military psychology. Military Psychology, 20, 39-69.
43. Jenkins, D.P., et al., 2010. A new approach for designing cognitive artefacts to support disaster management. Ergonomics, 53, 617-635.
44. Kennedy, D. and McComb, S., 2010. Merging internal and external processes: examining the mental model convergence process through team communication. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 11, 340-358.
45. Klein, G., Wiggins, S., and Dominguez, C.O., 2010. Team sensemaking. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 11, 304-320.
46. Koschman, T. and Lebaron, C., 2003. Reconsidering common ground: examining Clark contribution theory in the OR. In: K. Kuuti, E.H. Karsten, G. Fitzpatrick, P. Dourish, and K. Schmidt, eds. Proceedings of the eighth European conference on computer-supported cooperative work, Helsinki, Finland. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
47. Lim, B.C. and Klein, K.J., 2006. Team mental models and team performance: a field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 27, 403-418.
48. McCarthy, J., Miles, V., and Monk, A., 1991. An experimental study of common ground in text-based communication. In: Proceedings of the ACMconference on human factors in computing systems. New York: ACMPress, 209-215.
49. McComb, S., 2008. Shared mental models and their convergence. In: M.P. Letsky, N.W. Warner, S.M. Fiore, and C.A.P. Smith, eds. Macrocognition in teams: Theories and methodologies. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing, 35-50.
50. McComb, S., et al., 2010. Temporal patterns of mental model convergence: implications for distributed teams interacting in an electronic collaboration space. Human Factors, 52, 264-281.
51. McGrath, J.E., 1984. Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
52. Macquet, A.C. and Fleurance, P., 2007. Naturalistic decision-making in expert badminton players. Ergonomics, 50, 1433-1450.
53. Mathieu, J.E., et al., 2000. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273-283.
54. Mathieu, J.E., et al., 2005. Scaling the quality of teammates' mental models: Equifinality and normative comparisons. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 37-56.
55. Nyssen, A.S., 2007. Coordination in hospitals: organized or emergent process? Cognition, Technology & Work, 9, 149-154.
56. Pedersen, H.K. and Cooke, N., 2006. Applying work team results to sports teams: opportunities and cautions. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4, 363-369.
57. Poizat, G., et al., 2009. Analysis of contextual information sharing during table tennis matches: an empirical study on coordination in sports. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 7, 465-487.
58. Reimer, T., Park, E.S., and Hinsz, V.B., 2006. Shared and coordinated cognition in competitive and dynamic task environments: an information-processing perspective for team sports. International Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 4, 376-400.
59. Saavedra, R., Earley, P.C., and van Dyne, L., 1993. Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 61-72.
60. Salas, E., Cooke, N.J., and Rosen, M.A., 2008a. On teams, teamwork, and team performance: discoveries and developments. Human Factors, 50, 540-547.
61. Salas, E., Goodwin, G.F., and Burke, C.S., 2008b. Team effectiveness in complex organizations: Cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. Salmon, P., Stanton, N.A., and Gibbon, A., 2010. Human factors methods and sports science: A practical guide. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
63. Salmon, P.M., et al., 2008a. Representing situation awareness in collaborative systems: a case study in the energy distribution domain. Ergonomics, 51, 367-384.
64. Salmon, P.M., et al., 2008b. What really is going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 9, 297-323.
65. Salmon, P.M., et al., 2009. Distributed situation awareness: Theory, measurement and application to teamwork. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
66. Sarter, N.B. and Woods, D.D., 1991. Situation awareness: a critical but ill-defined phenomenon. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1, 45-57.
67. Sève, C., et al., 2002. La construction des connaissances chez les sportifs lors d'une interaction compé titive [Knowledge construction by athletes during competitive interaction]. Le Travail Humain, 65, 159-190.
68. Sève, C., et al., 2003. Structure of expert players' activity during competitive interaction in table tennis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 71-83.
69. Sève, C., et al., 2005. Course of action in table tennis: a qualitative analysis of knowledge used by three elite players during matches. European Review of Applied Psychology, 55, 145-155.
70. Sève, C., et al., 2006. A grounded theory of elite male table tennis players' activity during matches. The Sport Psychologist, 20, 58-73.
71. Sève, C., et al., 2007. Performance-induced emotions experienced during high-stakes table tennis matches. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 8, 25-46.
72. Sieck, W.R., et al., 2007. Focus: A model of sensemaking. Fairborn, OH: Klein Associates.
73. Smith, E.R. and Semin, G.R., 2007. Situated social cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 132.
74. Stagl, K.C., et al., 2006. Team adaptation: Realizing team synergy. Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering Research, 6, 117-141.
75. Stanton, N.A., et al., 2006. Distributed situation awareness in dynamic systems: theoretical development and application of an ergonomics methodology. Ergonomics, 49, 1288-1311.
76. Stanton, N.A., et al., 2009. Is situation awareness all in the mind? Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 11, 1-12.
77. Stout, R., Cannon-Bowers, J.A., and Salas, E., 1996. The role of shared mental models in developing team situation awareness: implications for training. Training Research Journal, 2, 85-116.
78. Strauss, A.L. and Corbin, J.M., 1990. Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
79. Tenenbaum, G., Edmonds, W.A., and Eccles, D.W., 2008. Emotions, coping strategies, and performance: a conceptual framework for defining affect-related performance zones. Military Psychology, 20, 11-37.
80. Theureau, J., 2002. Dynamic, living, social and cultural complex systems: principles of design-oriented analysis. Revue d'Intelligence Artificielle, 16, 485-516.
81. Theureau, J., 2003. Course-of-action analysis and course-ofaction centered design. In: E. Hollnagel, ed. Handbook of cognitive task design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 55-81.
82. Theureau, J., 2006. Cours d'action: Méthode développée [Course of action: Developments in methods]. Toulouse, FR: Octarè s.
83. Theureau, J. and Filippi, G., 2000. Analysing cooperative work in an urban traffic control room for the design of a coordination support system. In: P. Luff, J. Hindmarsh, and C. Heath, eds. Workplace studies: Recovering work practice and informing system design. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 68-91.
84. Theureau, J., et al., 2001. Development of a methodology for analysing the dynamic collective organisation of the reactor operator's and supervisor's courses of experience while controlling a nuclear reactor in accidental situations in full scope simulated control rooms. CSAPC'01, 23-26.
85. Theureau, J., et al., 2002. Cultural issues of nuclear power plant collective control in accidental situations and their impact upon design issues. In: Proceedings of the eleventh European conference on cognitive ergonomics-ECCE (11), 8-11 September, Catania, Italy, 8-11.
86. Uitdewilligen, S., Waller, M.J., and Zijlstra, F.R., 2010. Team cognition and adaptability in dynamic settings: a review of pertinent work. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 25, 293-345.
87. Wageman, R., 1995. Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145-180.
88. Walker, G.H., et al., 2010. From ethnography to the EAST method: a tractable approach for representing distributed cognition in Air Traffic Control. Ergonomics, 53, 184-197.
89. Ward, P. and Eccles, D.W., 2006. A commentary on 'team cognition and expert teams: emerging insights into learning and performance for exceptional teams'. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4, 463-483.
90. Wittenbaum, G.M., Stasser, G., and Merry, C.J., 1996. Tacit coordination in anticipation of small group task completion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 129-152.