Structure of expert players’ activity during competitive interaction in tabie tennis

Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 71-83

  Sève, Carole ^a   Saury, Jacques ^b   Ria, Luc ^c   Durand, Marc ^d  

^a French Table Tennis Association   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ CLERMONT AUVERGNE   (France)

^d University Institute of Teacher Education   (France)

Author keywords

Course of action; Situated action; Sport expertise

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; MALE; SPORT; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; MALE; SPORTS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 0037968223     PISSN: 02701367     EISSN: 21683824     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2003.10609066     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abernethy B. (1988). The effects of age and expertise upon perceptual skill development in a racquet sport. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 59 210–221.
2. Alain C. & Sarrazin C. (1985). L’activite des sujets. Prise de decision et traitement de l’information en squash [The subject’s activity: Decision making and information processing in squash]. Sciences et Techniques des Activités Physiques et Sportives 12 49–59.
3. Alain C. & Sarrazin C. (1990). Sportskill analysis: A simulation study of a decision making model of squash competition. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences 15(3) 193–200.
4. Anderson J. R., Reder L. & Simon H. T. A (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher 25(4) 5–11.
5. Anderson J. R., Reder L. & Simon H. T. A. (1997). Situative and cognitive perspectives: Form versus substance. Educational Researcher 26(1) 18–21.
6. Bootsma R., J Houbiers M. H. J., Van-Wieringen P. C. W & Whiting H. T. A. (1991). Acquiring an attacking forehand drive: The effects of static and dynamic environmental conditions. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 62 276–284.
7. Clancey W. J. (1997). Situated cognition. On human knowledge and computer representations. Cambridge United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
8. D’Arripe-Longueville F., Saury J., Fournier J. & Durand M. (2001). Coach-athlete interaction during elite archery competitions: An application of methodological frameworks used in ergonomics research to sport psychology. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 13 275–299.
9. Eco U. (1988). Lesigne [The sign] Brussels Belgium: Labor.
10. Ericsson K. A., Krampe R. T. & Tesch-Römer C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review 100 363–406.
11. Ericsson K. A. & Simon H. A. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. London: MIT Press.
12. Farrow D., Chivers P., Hardingham C. & Sachse S. (1998). The effect of video-based perceptual training on the tennis return of serve. International foumal of Sport Psychology 29 231–242.
13. French K. E. & McPherson S. L. (1999). Adaptations in response selection processes used during sport competition with increasing age and expertise. International Journal of Sport Psychology 30 173–193.
14. French K. E., Werner P. H., Rink J. E., Taylor K. & Hussey K. (1996). The effects of a 3-week unit of tactical skill or combined tactical and skill instruction on badminton performance of ninth-grade students. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 15 418–438.
15. Goulet C., Bard C. & Fleury M. (1989). Expertise differences in preparing to return a tennis serye. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 11 382–398.
16. Greeno J. G. (1989). Situations mental models and generative knowledge. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.) Complex information processing (pp. 285–328). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Greeno J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing learning and research. American Psychologist 53(1) 5–26.
18. Hauw D., Berthelot C. & Durand M. (in press). Enhancing performance in elite athletes through situated-cognition analysis: Trampolinists’ course of action during competition activity. International Journal of Sport Psychology.
19. Hutchins E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
20. Kirshner D. & Whitson J. A. (Eds.) (1997). Situated cognition. Social semiotic and psychological perspectives. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Lave J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Mind mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
22. Leblanc S., Saury J., Séve C., Durand M. & Theureau J. (2001). An analysis of a user’s exploration and learning of a multimedia instruction system. Computers åf Education 36 59–82.
23. Lincoln Y. S. & Guba E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills CA: Sage.
24. Martens R. (1997). Successful coaching. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics.
25. McPherson S. L. (1999a). Expert-novice differences in performance skills and problem representations of youth and adults during tennis competition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 70 233–251.
26. McPherson S. L. (1999b). Tactical differences in problem representations and solutions in collegiate varsity and beginner female tennis players. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 70 369–384.
27. McPherson S. L. & Thomas J. R. (1989). Relation of knowledge and performance in boy’s tennis: Age and expertise. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 48 190–211.
28. Norman D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart. Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. New York: Addison-Wesley.
29. Ria L., Saury J., Séve C. & Durand M. (2001). Les dilemmes des enseignants debutants: Etudes lors des premieres experiences de classe en Education Physique [Beginning teachers’ dilemmas: Studies of first experiences in physical education classes]. Sciences et Motricité 42 47–58.
30. Ripoll H. (1989). Uncertainty and visual strategies in table tennis. Perceptual and Motor Skill 68 507–512.
31. Salmela J. H. (Ed.) (1996). Great job coach. Ottawa Ontario Canada: Potentium.
32. Saury J., Durand M. & Theureau J. (1997). L’action d’un entraineur expert en competition: étude de cas. Contribution å une analyse ergonomique de l’entrainement [Case study: Action of an expert competition coach. Contribution to an ergonomic analysis of training]. Science et Motricité 21 21–35.
33. Scribner S. (1984). Studying working intelligence. In B. Rogoff &J. Lave (Eds.) Everyday cognition (pp. 9–40). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Séve C. (2000a). Analysesémiobgiquede Vactivitédepongistes de haut niveau lors de matchs intemationaux. Contribution ä une anthropologic cognitive de l ‘activité des sportifs finalisée par la conception d’aides å l’entrainement [Semiological analysis of the activity of top-level table tennis players during international matches. Contribution to a cognitive anthropology of athletes’ activity for the purposes of train-ing-aid design]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Montpellier Montpellier France.
35. Séve C. (2000b). Tennis de table: Entrainement et competition [Table tennis: Training and competition] Montrouge France: FFTT.
36. Séve C. (2001). Dynamique et signification de 1’activité des pongistes en match [Dynamics and meaning of table tennis players’ activity during a match]. In E. Louis (Ed.) Sports de raquette. Entre théorie et pratiques (pp. 89–99). Dossier EPS No. 53. Paris: Editions Revue EPS.
37. Séve C. & Durand M. (1999). L’action de l’entraineur de tennis de table comme action située [Action of the table tennis coach as situated action]. Avante 5 69–86.
38. Séve C., Saury J., Theureau J. & Durand M. (2002a). La construction de connaissances chez les sportifs au cours d’une interaction competitive [Knowledge construction by athletes during competitive interaction]. Le Travail Humain 65 159–190.
39. Séve C., Saury J., Theureau J. & Durand M. (2002b). Activity organization and knowledge construction during competitive interaction in table tennis. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research 3 501–522.
40. Simon H. A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
41. Singer R. N., Cauraugh J. H., Chen D., Steinberg G. M. & Frehlich S. G. (1996). Visual search anticipation and reactive comparisons between highly skilled and beginning tennis players. Journal of Applied Sports Psychology 8 9–26.
42. Suchman L. (1987). Plans and situated action. Cambridge United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press
43. Theureau J. (1992). Le cours d’action: Analyse sémiobgique. Essai d’une anthropologie cognitive située [The course of action: semiological analysis. Essay on situated cognitive anthropology] Berne Switzerland: Peter Lang.
44. Theureau J. & Filippi G. (1994). Cours d’action et conception d’aide å la coordination du trafie du RER [Course of action and design of aids for metro traffic coordination]. Sociologie du Travail 4 547–562.
45. Theureau J. & Filippi G. (in press). Analyzing cooperative work in an urban traffic central room for the design of a coordination support system. In C. C. Heath P. Luff & J. Hindmarsh (Eds.) Workplace studies. Cambridge United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
46. Von Cranach M. & Harré R. (Eds.). (1982). The analysis of action. Recent theoretical and empirical advances. Cambridge United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
47. Weineck J. (1983). Manueld’entrainemenl [Trainingmanual]. Paris: Vigot.
48. Werchoschanski J. W. (1992). L’entrainement efficace. Pour une programmation efficace de l’entrainement [Effective training. Towards effective programming of training]. Paris: PUF.
49. Whitson J. A. (1997). Cognition as a semiosic process: From situated mediation to critical reflective transcendence. In D. Kirshner &J. A. Whitson (Eds.) Situated cognition. Social semiotic and psychological perspectives (pp. 97–149). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.