A grounded theory of elite male table tennis players' activity during matches

Sport Psychologist

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 58-73

  Sève, Carole ^a   Poizat, Germain ^a   Saury, Jacques ^b   Durand, Marc ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE ROUEN   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE NANTES   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645763403     PISSN: 08884781     EISSN: 15432793     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/tsp.20.1.58     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Arripe-Longueville, F. (d'), Saury, J., Fournier, J., Durand, M. (2001). Coach-athlete interaction during elite archery competitions: An application of methodological frameworks used in ergonomics research to sport psychology. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13, 275-299.
2. Bawden, M.A.K., Chell, B.J., & Maynard, I.W. (2004). The sources of stress for junior table tennis players who attend the English National Training Academy. In A. Lees, J.-F. Kahn & I.W. Maynard (Eds.), Science and racket sports 111 (pp. 235-240). London: Routledge.
3. Bodin, D. (1995). Tennis de table. Entraînement et planification [Table tennis: Training and planning]. Margaux: Edisport.
4. Eccles, D.W., Walsh, S.E., & Ingledew, D.K. (2002). A grounded theory of expert cognition in orienteering. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24, 68-88.
5. Gadal, M. (1996). Tennis de table. La route du succès [Table tennis. The road to success]. Margaux: Edi sport.
6. Gilbert, W., & Trudel, P. (2001). Learning to coach through experience: Reflection in model youth sport coaches. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21, 16-34.
7. Gilbert, W.D., Trudel, P., & Haughian, L. (1999). Interactive decision making factors considered by coaches of youth ice hockey during games. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 18, 290-311.
8. Gould, D., Giannini, J., Krane, V., & Hodge, K. (1990). Educational needs of elite U.S. national team, pan-American, and Olympic coaches. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 9, 332-344.
9. Hauw, D, Berthelot, C., & Durand, M (2003). Enhancing performance in elite athlete through situated-cognition analysis: Trampolinists' course of action during competition. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 34, 299-321.
10. Hauw, D., & Durand, M. (2005). How do athletes interact with the environment in competition? A situated analysis of trampolinists' activity. European Review of Applied Psychology, 55, 207-215.
11. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14. Norman, D.A. (1993). Things that make us smart. Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. New York: Addison-Wesley.
15. Omodei, M. M., McLennan, J., & Whitford, P. (1998). Using a head-mounted video camera and two-stage replay to enhance orienteering performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 29, 115-131.
16. Poizat, G., Sève, C., & Rossard, C. (in press). Influencer les jugements de l'adversaire au cours des interactions sportives compétitives: un exemple en tennis de table [Influencing opponent's judgments during interactions in sports competition: The example of table tennis]. European Review of Applied Psychology.
17. Saury, J., & Sève, C. (Eds.) (2004). L'entraînement. Les entraîneurs et leurs pratiques [Training. Coaches and their practices]. Paris: Editions Revue EPS.
18. Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
19. Sève, C. (2000). Tennis de table: entraînement et compétition [Table tennis: Training and competition]. Montrouge: FFTT.
20. Sève, C. (2004). Impact of the new scoring system on expert table tennis player's activity. In A. Lees, J.-F. Kahn & I. W. Maynard (Eds.), Science and racket sports III (pp. 271-276). London: Routledge.
21. Sève, C., Saury, J., Leblanc, S., & Durand, M. (2005). Course of action in table tennis: A qualitative analysis of knowledge used by three elite players during matches. European Review of Applied Psychology, 55, 145-155.
22. Sève, C., Saury, J., Ria, L., & Durand, M. (2003). Structure of expert players' activity during competitive interaction in table tennis. Research Quarterly for Sport and Exercise, 74, 71-83.
23. Sève, C., Saury, J., Theureau, J., & Durand, M. (2002a). Activity organization and knowledge construction during competitive interaction in table tennis. Cognitive Systems Research, 3, 501-522.
24. Sève, C., Saury, J., Theureau, J., & Durand, M. (2002b). La construction des connaissances chez les sportifs lors d'une interaction compétitive [Knowledge construction by athletes during competitive interaction]. Le Travail Humain, 65, 159-190.
25. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26. Theureau, J. (1992). Le cours d'action: Analyse sémio-logique. Essai d'une anthropologie cognitive située [The course of action: Semiological analysis. Essay on situated cognitive anthropology]. Berne: Peter Lang.
27. Theureau, J., & Jeffroy., F. (1994). Ergonomie des situations informatisées [Ergonomy in situations of computer use]. Toulouse: Octarès.
28. Trudel, P., Gilbert, W., & Tochon, F. (2001). The use of video in the construction of knowledge and meaning in sport pedagogy research. International Journal of Applied Semiotics, 2, 89-112.
29. Trudel, P., Haughian, L., & Gilbert, W. (1996). L'utilisation de la technique du rappel stimulé pour mieux comprendre le processus d'intervention de l'entraîneur en sport [Use of the stimulated recall technique to better understand the intervention process in sport coaching]. Revue des Sciences de l'Education, 22, 503-522.
30. Turcotte, C. (1973). La fiabilité des systèmes d'analyse d'enseignement [The reliability of teaching systems]. In G. Dussault, M. Leclerc, J. Brunelle, & C. Turcotte (Eds.), L'analyse de l'enseignement [Teaching analysis] (pp. 189-230). Montreal: PUQ.
31. Varela, F. (1980). Principles of biological autonomy. New York: Elsevier North Holland.
32. Varela, F.J., & Shear, J. (1999). The view from within. First-person approaches to the study of consciousness. Paris: Seuil.
33. von Cranach, M. & Harré, R. (Eds.). (1982). The analysis of action. Recent theoretical and empirical advances. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
34. West, R.L., & Lebiere, C. (2001). Simples games as dynamic,coupled systems: Randomness and other emergent properties. Cognitive Systems Research, 1, 221-239.
35. Woodman, L. (1993). Coaching: A science, an art, an emerging profession. Sport Science Review, 2, 1-13.