|
Volumn 25, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 991-994
|
Helsen, Gilis, and Weston (2006) do not err in questioning the optical error hypothesis as the only major account for explaining offside decision-making errors
|
Author keywords
Assistant referees; Decision making skills; Offside
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
COMPUTER GRAPHICS;
DECISION MAKING;
ERROR;
FOOTBALL;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
NORMAL HUMAN;
PERFORMANCE;
SPORTS PSYCHOLOGY;
VISUAL INFORMATION;
ADULT;
MOVEMENT PERCEPTION;
NETHERLANDS;
NOTE;
SPORT;
VISION;
VISUAL ILLUSION;
ADULT;
HUMANS;
JUDGMENT;
MOTION PERCEPTION;
NETHERLANDS;
OPTICAL ILLUSIONS;
SOCCER;
VISUAL PERCEPTION;
|
EID: 34447509597
PISSN: 02640414
EISSN: 1466447X
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1080/02640410601150488 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (10)
|
References (6)
|