메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 25, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 991-994

Helsen, Gilis, and Weston (2006) do not err in questioning the optical error hypothesis as the only major account for explaining offside decision-making errors

Author keywords

Assistant referees; Decision making skills; Offside

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DECISION MAKING; ERROR; FOOTBALL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PERFORMANCE; SPORTS PSYCHOLOGY; VISUAL INFORMATION; ADULT; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NETHERLANDS; NOTE; SPORT; VISION; VISUAL ILLUSION;

EID: 34447509597     PISSN: 02640414     EISSN: 1466447X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02640410601150488     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (10)

References (6)
  • 3
    • 33645888712 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Errors in judging "offside" in football: Test of the optical error versus the perceptual flash-lag hypothesis
    • Helsen, W. F., Gilis, B. and Weston, M. (2006) Errors in judging "offside" in football: Test of the optical error versus the perceptual flash-lag hypothesis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24, pp. 521-528.
    • (2006) Journal of Sports Sciences , vol.24 , pp. 521-528
    • Helsen, W.F.1    Gilis, B.2    Weston, M.3
  • 4
    • 34447527454 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Helsen, Gillis and Weston (2006) err in testing the optical error hypothesis
    • Oudejans, R. R. D., Bakker, F. C. and Beek, P. J. (2007) Helsen, Gillis and Weston (2006) err in testing the optical error hypothesis. Journal of Sports Sciences
    • (2007) Journal of Sports Sciences
    • Oudejans, R.R.D.1    Bakker, F.C.2    Beek, P.J.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.