Situated social cognition

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 132-135

  Smith, Eliot R ^a   Semin, Gün R ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Automatic processes; Context; Situated; Social cognition; Stereotypes

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250326283     PISSN: 09637214     EISSN: 14678721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00490.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Blair, I.V. (2002). (See ss5References)
2. Chiu, C., Krauss, R.M., & Lau, I.Y.-M. (1998). Some cognitive consequences of communication. In S.R. Fussell & R.J. Kreuz (Eds.), Social and cognitive approaches to interpersonal communication (pp. 259-279). New Jersey: Erlbaum.
3. Clark, A. (1997). (See ss5References)
4. Smith, E.R. & Semin, G.R. (2004). (See ss5References)
5. Barsalou, L.W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577 660.
6. Blair, I.V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 242 261.
7. Bodenhausen, G.V., Schwarz, N., Bless, H. Waenke, M. (1995). Effects of atypical exemplars on racial beliefs: Enlightened racism or generalized appraisals? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 48 63.
8. Clark, A. (1997). Being there. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
9. DeSteno, D., Dasgupta, N., Bartlett, M.Y. Cajdric, A. (2004). Prejudice from thin air: The effect of emotion on automatic intergroup attitudes. Psychological Science, 15, 319 324.
10. Fazio, R.H. Olson, M.A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and uses. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297 327.
11. Higgins, E.T. Rholes, W.S. (1978). "Saying is believing": Effects of message modification on memory and liking for the person perceived. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 363 378.
12. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
13. Maass, A. (1999). Linguistic intergroup bias: Stereotype perpetuation through language. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 79 121). San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
14. Norenzayan, A. Schwarz, N. (1999). Telling what they want to know: Participants tailor causal attributions to researchers' interests. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 1011 1020.
15. Semin, G.R. (2007). Grounding communication: Synchrony. In A. Kruglanski E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (2nd ed., pp. 630 644). New York : Guilford Publications.
16. Semin, G.R., de Montes, G.L. Valencia, J.F. (2003). Communication constraints on the linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 142 148.
17. Sinclair, L. Kunda, Z. (1999). Reactions to a Black professional: Motivated inhibition and activation of conflicting stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 885 904.
18. Smith, E.R. Semin, G.R. (2004). Socially situated cognition: Cognition in its social context. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 53 117.
19. Yeh, W. Barsalou, L.W. (2006). The situated nature of concepts. American Journal of Psychology, 119, 349 384.