Experimental study of creep response of viscoelastic contact interface under force control

IEEE/RSJ 2010 International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS 2010 - Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 4275-4280

  Tsai, Chia Hung Dylan ^a   Kao, Imin ^a   Shibata, Akihide ^b   Yoshimoto, Kayo ^b   Higashimori, Mitsuru ^b   Kaneko, Makoto ^b  

^a Stony Brook University   (United States)

^b OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTACT INTERFACE; CONTACT SURFACE; CREEP RESPONSE; ELASTIC RESPONSE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES; EXTERNAL FORCE; LOADING RATE; ROBOTIC FINGER; ROBOTIC FOOT; ROBOTIC GRASPING; TEMPORAL RESPONSE; VISCO-ELASTIC MATERIAL; VISCOELASTIC CONTACT;

CREEP; FORCE CONTROL; INTELLIGENT ROBOTS; POSITION CONTROL; ROBOTIC ARMS; VISCOELASTICITY;

ROBOTICS;

EID: 78651513834     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IROS.2010.5650888     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. D. B. Adolf, R. S. Chambers, and J. Flemming. Potential energy clock model: Justification and challenging predictions. Journal of Rheology, 51(3):517-540, 2007.
2. F. Barbagli, A. Frisoli, K. Salisbury, and M. Bergamasco. Simulating human fingers: a soft finger proxy model and algorithm. In Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. on Haptic Interface, HAPTICS'04, 2004.
3. W. N. Findley and J. S. Y. Lay. A modified superposition principle applied to creep of non-linear viscoelastic material under abrupt changes in state of combined stress. Trans. of the Society of Rheology, vol. 11(3):361-380, 1967.
4. W. Flugge. Viscoelasticity. Blaisdell Publishing Company, 1967.
5. Y. C. Fung. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues. Springer-Verlag, 1993.
6. A. Z. Golik and Y. F. Zabashta. a molecular model of creep and stress relaxation in crystalline polymers. Mekhanika Polimerov, pages 969-975, 1971.
7. R. D. Howe, N. Popp, I. Kao, P. Akella, and M. R. Cutkosky. Grasping, manipulation, and control with tactile sensing. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, ICRA, Cincinnati, OH, 1990.
8. T. Inoue and S. Hirai. Elastic model of deformable fingertip for soft- fingered manipulation. IEEE Trans. in Robotics, 22:1273-1279, 2006.
9. T. Inoue and S. Hirai. Quasi-static manipulation using hemispherical soft fingertips by means of minimum d.o.f. two-fingered robotic hand. J. of the Robotics Society of Japan, 24:945-953, 2006.
10. J. W. Jameson. Analytic Techniques for Automated Grasp. PhD thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, June 1985.
11. I. Kao and F. Yang. Stiffness and contact mechanics for soft fingers in grasping and manipulation. the IEEE Trans. of Robotics and Automation, 20(1):132-135, February 2004.
12. M. Kimura, Y. Sugiyama, S. Tomokuni, and S. Hirai. Constructing rheologically deformable virtual objects. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, ICRA, pages 3737-3743, 2003.
13. Y. Li and I. Kao. A review of modeling of soft-contact fingers and stiffness control for dextrous manipulation in robotics. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, ICRA, pages 3055-3060, Seoul, Korea, 2001.
14. D. T. V. Pawluk and R. D. Howe. Dynamic contact of the human fingerpad against a flat surface. ASME Jour. of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 121(6):605-611, 1999.
15. N. Sakamoto, M. Higashimori, T. Tsuji, and M. Kaneko. An optimum design of robotic hand for handling a visco-elastic object based on maxwell model. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2007, pages 1219-1225, Roma, Italy, April 10-14 2007.
16. K. B. Shimoga and A. A. Goldenberg. Soft robotic fingertips - part I and II: A comparison of construction materials. Int. Jour. of Robotic Research, 15(4), 1996.
17. H. Takagi, M. Takahashi, R. Maeda, Y. Onishi, Y. Iriye, T. Iwasaki, and Y. Hirai. Analysis of time dependent polymer deformation based on a viscoelastic model in thermal imprint process. Microelectronic Engineering, 85:902-906, 2008.
18. P. Tiezzi and I. Kao. Characteristics of contact and limit surface for viscoelastic fingers. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2006, pages 1365-1370, Orlando, Florida, May 15-19 2006.
19. P. Tiezzi and I. Kao. Modeling of viscoelastic contacts and evolution of limit surface for robotic contact interface. IEEE Transaction on Robotics, 23(2):206-217, April 2007.
20. P. Tiezzi, I. Kao, and G. Vassura. Effect of layer compliance on frictional behavior of soft robotic fingers. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2006), pages 4012-4017, Beijing, China, October 2006.
21. P. Tiezzi, I. Kao, and G. Vassura. Effect of layer compliance on frictional behavior of soft robotic fingers. Advanced Robotics, 21(14):1653-1670, 2007.
22. C. D. Tsai and I. Kao. The latency model for viscoelastic contact interface in robotics: Theory and experiments. In Proc. 2009 IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2009), pages 1291-1296, Kobe, Japan, May 2009.
23. C. D. Tsai, I. Kao, N. Sakamoto, M. Higashimori, and M. Kaneko. Applying viscoelastic contact modeling to grasping task: an experimental case study. In International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS, pages 3737-3743, 2008.
24. C. D. Tsai, I. Kao, K. Yoshimoto, M. Higashimori, and M. Kaneko. An experimental study and modeling of loading and unloading of nonlinear viscoelastic contacts. In International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS, pages 3737-3743, October 2009.
25. N. Xydas and I. Kao. Modeling of contacts and force/moment for anthropomorphic soft fingers. In Proc. of Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS, pages 488-493, Victoria, Canada, 1998.
26. N. Xydas and I. Kao. Modeling of contact mechanics and friction limit surface for soft fingers in robotics, with experimental results. Int. J. of Robotic Research, 18(8):941-950, 1999.