No guts, no glory: Courage, harassment and minority influence

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 101-124

  Baron, Robert S ^a,b   Bellman, S Beth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b E11 SSH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846337534     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.341     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Alvaro, E. M., & Crano, W. D. (1997). Indirect minority influence: Evidence for leniency in source evaluation and counter-argumentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 949-964.
2. Baker, S. M., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Majority and minority influence: Source-position imbalance as a determinant of message scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 5-19.
3. Baron, R. M, & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4. Baron, R. S., & Kerr, N. (2003). Group process, group decision, group action (2nd ed.). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
5. Bohner, G., Frank, E., & Erb, H. (1998). Heuristic processing of distinctiveness information in minority and majority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 855-860.
6. Crano, W. D., & Alvaro, E. M. (1998). The context/comparison model of social influence: Mechanisms, structure, and linkages that underlie indirect attitude change. In W. Stroebe, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 175-202). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
7. Crano, W. D., & Chen, X. (1998). The leniency contract and persistence of majority and minority influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1437-1450.
8. David, B., & Turner, J. C. (1996). Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: Is being a member of the out-group an advantage? British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 179-199.
9. De Dreu, C. K. W., & De Vries, N. K. (1996). Differential processing and attitude change following majority versus minority arguments. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 77-90.
10. Hays, W. L. (1963). Statistics. New York: Holt Rinehart & Wintson.
11. Kerr, N. L. (2002). When is a minority a minority? Active versus passive minority advocacy and social influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 471-483.
12. Kruglanski, A. W., & Mackie, D. (1990). Majority and minority influence: A judgmental process analysis. In W. Stroebe, &M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 229- 261). London: Wiley.
13. Maass, A., & Clark, R. D., III. (1983). Internalization versus compliance: Differential processes underlying minority influence and conformity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 197-215.
14. Mackie, D. M. (1987). Systematic and nonsystematic processing of majority and minority persuasive communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 41-52.
15. Maheswaren, D., & Chaiken, S. (1991). Promoting systematic processing in low motivation settings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 13-25.
16. Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2001a). Conformity and independence in groups: Majorities and minorities. In M. A. Hogg, & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 210-234). Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
17. Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2001b). Determinants and consequences of cognitive processes in majority and minority influence. In J. P. Forgas, & K. D. Williams (Eds.), Social influence (pp. 315-330). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
18. Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2003). Majority versus minority influence: When, not whether, source status instigates heuristic or systematic processing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 313-330.
19. McLeod, P., Baron, R. S., Marti, M. W., & Yoon, K. (1997). The eyes have it: Minority influence in face to face and computer mediated group discussion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 706-718.
20. Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 209-239). New York: Academic Press.
21. Moscovici, S. (1985). Social influence and conformity. In G. Lindzey, & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 347-412). New York: Random House.
22. Mucchi-Faina, A., & Cicoletti, G. (2006). Divergence vs. ambivalence: Effects of personal relevance on minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 91-104.
23. Mugny, G., Butera, F., Sanchez-Mazas, M., & Perez, J. A. (1995). Judgments in conflict: The conflict elaboration theory of social influence. In B. Boothe, R. Hirsig, A. Helminger, B. Meier, & R. Volkart (Eds.), Perception, evaluation, interpretation (Swiss Monographs in Psychology, Vol. 3, pp. 160-168). Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
24. Mugny, G., & Perez, J. A. (1991). The social psychology of minority influence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Nemeth, C. J., & Chiles, C. (1988). Modeling courage: The role of dissent in fostering independence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 275-280.
26. Perez, J. A., Mugny, G., & Moscovici, S. (1986). Les effets paradoxaux du déni dans l'influence sociale. Cahiers de Psychologie Sociale, 32, 1-14.
27. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) Communication & persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer Verlag.
28. Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, M. S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytical review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323-345.
29. Worchel, S., Arnold, S., & Baker, M. (1975). The effects of censorship on attitude change: The influence of censor and communication characteristics. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5, 227-239.