Teaching With Rubrics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

College Teaching

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 27-31

  Andrade, Heidi Goodrich ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

assessment; grading; rubrics

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044220799     PISSN: 87567555     EISSN: 19308299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/CTCH.53.1.27-31     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Andrade, H. G. 2001. The effects of instructional rubrics on learning to write. Current Issues in Education 4 (4), http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume4/number4.
2. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation Moskal, B., and J. Leydens. 2000. Scoring rubric development: Validity and reliability. 7 (10), http://ericae.net/pare/getvn.asp?v=7& n;=10.
3. Payne, D. A. 2003. Applied educational assessment. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
4. Popham, J. W. 1997. What's wrong—and what's right—with rubrics. Educational Leadership 55 (2): 72–75.
5. Shepard, L. 2000. The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher 29 (7): 4–14.
6. Black, P., and Wiliam, D. 1998. Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan 80 (2): 139–18.
7. Goodrich, H. 1997. Understanding rubrics. Educational Leadership 54 (4): 14–17.
8. Andrade, H. G. 2000. Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership 57 (5): 13–18.
9. Falchikov, N. 1986. Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative peer group and self assessments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 11 (2): 146–66.