Application of ICT and rubrics to the assessment process where professional judgement is involved: The features of an e-marking tool

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 529-537

  Campbell, Alistair ^a  

^a EDITH COWAN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 59849128851     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930500187055     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998) Assessment and classroom learning, Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74.
2. Boud, D. J. (1995) Enhancing learning through self assessment (London, Kogan Page).
3. Boud, D. J. (1995a) Assessment and learning: contradictory or complementary?, in: P. Knight (Ed.) Assessment for learning in higher education (London, Kogan Page), 35-48.
4. Brown, S. & Knight, P. (1994) Assessing learners in higher education (London, Kogan Page).
5. Bull, J. & Sharp, D. (2000) Developments in computer-assisted assessment in UK higher education, paper presented at the Learning to Choose: Choosing to Learn Conference, Queensland, Australia.
6. Coffin, D. G. (2002) Saving time with a rubric buffet, Strategies, 16, 5-8.
7. Freeman, R. & Lewis, R. (1998) Planning and implementing assessment (London, Kogan Page).
8. Fry, H., Ketteridge, S. & Marshall, S. (1999) A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: enhancing academic practice. (London, Kogan Page).
9. Knight, P. T. (2002) The value of a programme-wide approach to assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(3), 237-251.
10. McCollister, S. (2002) Developing criteria rubrics in the art classroom, Art Education, 55, 46-52.
11. Miller, A. H., Cox, K. & Imrie, B. W. (1998) Student assessment in higher education: a handbook for assessing performance (London, Kogan Page).
12. Montgomery, K. (2000) Classroom rubrics: systematizing what teachers do naturally, The Clearing House, 73, 324-328.
13. Montgomery, K. (2002) Authentic tasks and rubrics: going beyond traditional assessments in college teaching, College Teaching, 50, 34-39.
14. Preston, J. & Shackelford, R. (1999) Improving on-line assessment: an investigation of existing marking methodologies, paper presented at the ITICSE. Available online at: http://portal.acm.org/citation. cfm?id=305840.
15. Wenzlaff, T. L., Fager, J. J. & Coleman, M. J. (1999) What is a rubric? Do practitioners and the literature agree?, Contemporary Education, 70, 41-46.
16. Yorke, M. (1998) The management of assessment in higher education, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), 101-116.